Literature DB >> 27783876

Insights from echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and microcomputed tomography relative to the mid-myocardial left ventricular echogenic zone.

Peter Agger1, Robert S Stephenson2,3, Halina Dobrzynski4, Andrew Atkinson4, Paul A Iaizzo5, Robert H Anderson6,7, Jonathan C Jarvis2, Sarah L Allan8, John B Partridge9, Jichao Zhao10, Henggui Zhang11, David H MacIver12,13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anatomical substrate for the mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone remains uncertain, but it may represent no more than ultrasound reflected from cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam. We sought to ascertain the relationship between the echogenic zone and the orientation of the cardiomyocytes.
METHODS: We used 3D echocardiography, diffusion tensor imaging, and microcomputed tomography to analyze the location and orientation of cardiomyocytes within the echogenic zone.
RESULTS: We demonstrated that visualization of the echogenic zone is dependent on the position of the transducer and is most clearly seen from the apical window. Diffusion tensor imaging and microcomputed tomography show that the echogenic zone seen from the apical window corresponds to the position of the circumferentially orientated cardiomyocytes. An oblique band seen in the parasternal view relates to cardiomyocytes orientated orthogonally to the ultrasonic beam.
CONCLUSIONS: The mid-mural ventricular hyperechogenic zone represents reflected ultrasound from cardiomyocytes aligned orthogonal to the ultrasonic beam. The echogenic zone does not represent a space, a connective tissue sheet, a boundary between ascending and descending limbs of a hypothetical helical ventricular myocardial band, nor an abrupt change in cardiomyocyte orientation.
© 2016, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyocyte orientation; computed tomography; diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging; echocardiography; helical ventricular myocardial band

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27783876     DOI: 10.1111/echo.13324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  7 in total

Review 1.  [The antagonistic function of the heart muscle sustains the autoregulation according to Frank and Starling : Part I: Structure and function of heart muscle].

Authors:  P P Lunkenheimer; P Niederer; J M Lunkenheimer; H Keller; K Redmann; M Smerup; R H Anderson
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Evolution of the vertebrate heart.

Authors:  Robert H Anderson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Will the real ventricular architecture please stand up?

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-09

Review 4.  Resolving the True Ventricular Mural Architecture.

Authors:  Robert S Stephenson; Peter Agger; Camilla Omann; Damian Sanchez-Quintana; Jonathan C Jarvis; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 5.  Assessing Myocardial Architecture: The Challenges and Controversies.

Authors:  Peter Agger; Robert S Stephenson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Impact of intraventricular septal fiber orientation on cardiac electromechanical function.

Authors:  Jairo Rodríguez-Padilla; Argyrios Petras; Julie Magat; Jason Bayer; Yann Bihan-Poudec; Dounia El Hamrani; Girish Ramlugun; Aurel Neic; Christoph M Augustin; Fanny Vaillant; Marion Constantin; David Benoist; Line Pourtau; Virginie Dubes; Julien Rogier; Louis Labrousse; Olivier Bernus; Bruno Quesson; Michel Haïssaguerre; Matthias Gsell; Gernot Plank; Valéry Ozenne; Edward Vigmond
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.125

Review 7.  What Is the Heart? Anatomy, Function, Pathophysiology, and Misconceptions.

Authors:  Gerald D Buckberg; Navin C Nanda; Christopher Nguyen; Mladen J Kocica
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2018-06-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.