Literature DB >> 27783313

The status of the performance of medication reviews in German community pharmacies and assessment of the practical performance.

Claudia Greißing1,2,3, Katharina Kössler1,2,3, Johanna Freyer2,3, Lucie Hüter2,3, Peter Buchal1, Susanne Schiek2,3, Thilo Bertsche4,5.   

Abstract

Background Pharmacist-led medication reviews have shown to prevent drug-related problems (DRPs). So far, data is rare about the implementation in routine care, the conditions for intensifying this service and the practical skills of community pharmacists to perform medication reviews. Objective To assess the current status of medication review implementation in German community pharmacies and the performance of identifying DRPs in a ficticious patient example. Setting German community pharmacies. Method An online survey was conducted from July to September 2015 including questions about medication reviews currently performed in routine care of community pharmacies and hidden DRPs in a ficticious patient example. Pharmacists were invited via newsletters from three local chambers of pharmacists. Main outcome measure (i) Frequency, conditions for implementation, and criteria of medication reviews currently being performed in routine care, (ii) requested further information to perform medication reviews, and (iii) proportion of pharmacists who identify DRPs in the patient example. Results A total of 143 community pharmacists completed the questionnaire. (i) One hundred and twenty-seven respondents (89 %) reported reviewing the medication regularly in routine care, whereas 56 (39 %) stated that they performed medication reviews between one and five times monthly. For 124 pharmacists (87 %), remuneration would be a necessary condition for performing medication reviews more frequently. When reviewing the medication, 112 (78 %) of the pharmacists considered the criterion 'drug-drug interactions' and 107 (75 %) reviewed the criterion 'correct dosage'. One of the least reviewed criteria was 'effectiveness of medication' [22 (16 %)]. (ii) According to the participants, laboratory values should be available in the community pharmacy, since 87/143 (61 %) would appreciate the GFR and the HbA1c level. Twenty-two of 54 respondents (41 %) would appreciate further administration instructions and 5 of 54 (15 %) think they would benefit from information about the recommended duration of drug use. (iii) Depending on the category, 4 (3 %) to 49 (34 %) of all 143 pharmacists identified the hidden DRP in the patient example. Conclusion German community pharmacists reported reviewing the medication of their patients regularly; however, most of the respondents review the medication very rarely in routine care. Consequently, their practical performance needs to be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community pharmacists; Drug-related problems; Germany; Implementation; Medication review; Online questionnaire; Practical performance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27783313     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0381-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  35 in total

1.  Usually Available Clinical and Laboratory Data Are Insufficient for a Valid Medication Review: A Crossover Study.

Authors:  K P G M Hurkens; C Mestres-Gonzalvo; H A J M de Wit; P H M van der Kuy; R Janknegt; F Verhey; J M G A Schols; C D A Stehouwer; B Winkens; W Mulder
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  M I Geer; P A Koul; S A Tanki; M Y Shah
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services.

Authors:  Sherilyn K D Houle; Kelly A Grindrod; Trish Chatterley; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-07

4.  The impact of a structured pharmacist intervention on the appropriateness of prescribing in older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  David O'Sullivan; Denis O'Mahony; Marie N O'Connor; Paul Gallagher; Shane Cullinan; Richard O'Sullivan; James Gallagher; Joseph Eustace; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Harvey J Murff; Josh F Peterson; Tejal K Gandhi; David W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Improving the quality of pharmacotherapy in elderly primary care patients through medication reviews: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Veronica Milos; Eva Rekman; Åsa Bondesson; Tommy Eriksson; Ulf Jakobsson; Tommy Westerlund; Patrik Midlöv
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Drug-related admissions and hospital-acquired adverse drug events in Germany: a longitudinal analysis from 2003 to 2007 of ICD-10-coded routine data.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg; Joerg Hasford
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alemayehu B Mekonnen; Andrew J McLachlan; Jo-Anne E Brien
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Indication for pharmacological treatment is often lacking: a cross-sectional study on the quality of drug therapy among the elderly.

Authors:  Jessica Skoog; Patrik Midlöv; Anders Beckman; Jan Sundquist; Anders Halling
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Pharmacist-Led Medication Reviews to Identify and Collaboratively Resolve Drug-Related Problems in Psychiatry - A Controlled, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Carolin Wolf; Anne Pauly; Andreas Mayr; Teja Grömer; Bernd Lenz; Johannes Kornhuber; Kristina Friedland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Knowledge of and readiness for medication therapy management among community pharmacists in Lebanon.

Authors:  Souraya Domiati; Hala Sacre; Nathalie Lahoud; Georges Sili; Pascale Salameh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Kerstin Bitter; Christina Pehe; Manfred Krüger; Gabriela Heuer; Regine Quinke; Ulrich Jaehde
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Instruments to assess the role of the clinical pharmacist: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marina Oliveira Chagas; Tácio de Mendonça Lima; Flávio Rebustini; Matias Noll; Débora Penélope de Carvalho Queiroz; Janete Capel Hernandes; Neuma Chaveiro; Maria Alves Barbosa; Celmo Celeno Porto
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-22

4.  Prevalence and risk factors of drug-related problems identified in pharmacy-based medication reviews.

Authors:  Raphael Sell; Marion Schaefer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-02-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.