Literature DB >> 27783108

[PEEK cage fusion after anterior cervical corpectomy : Clinical and radiological results in patients with spondylotic myelopathy].

C Schulz1, U M Mauer2, R Mathieu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) has become a standard procedure for patients with spondylotic myelopathy due to multisegmental stenosis of the cervical canal. In addition to the fusion technique using autogenous bone grafts and titanium implants, synthetic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been used increasingly during the last years. However, limited evidence on the clinical and radiological results of PEEK cages for ACCF exists in the literature. The study presented here is the largest series to date reporting clinical and radiological outcome as well as complication rates after one to three-level ACCF using PEEK cages augmented by an anterior plate-screw osteosynthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on 101 patients after stand-alone PEEK cage-ACCF with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The number of hardware failures and implant-related surgical revisions were determined. The rate of subsidence and fusion and the course of lordotic alignment were analysed. The neck disability index (NDI) and the European myelopathy score (EMS) were assessed.
RESULTS: Screw complications were detected in 8/101 cases and 3 cases of cage dislocation occurred, resulting in an overall implant related revision rate of 2.9 % (all revision cases showed cage dislocation). The rate of cage subsidence >3 mm was 12 % and solid fusion was achieved in 82 % of the patients. NDI, EMS and lordotic alignment improved significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: PEEK cages are a safe and effective alternative to titanium cages or autogenous bone graft for ACCF. Further randomized evaluation of different fusion techniques in ACCF is still necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Retrospective study; Spinal column; Spinal cord disorders; Spondylodesis; Stenosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27783108     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3345-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  30 in total

1.  Early reconstruction failures after multilevel cervical corpectomy.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Robert A Ruggiero; Thomas M Reilly; Peter V Hall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  "Statistically significant" does not necessarily mean 'clinically different' on pain/quality of life scales: opportune remarks on clinical outcomes measures in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Raj D Rao; Krishnaj Gourab; Kenny S David
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Clinical experience using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral structural cage for anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Manish K Kasliwal; John E O'Toole
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 5.  Role of corpectomy in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Iain H Kalfas
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 6.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sheng-Dan Jiang; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Distractable titanium cages versus PEEK cages versus iliac crest bone grafts for the replacement of cervical vertebrae.

Authors:  Stefan Alexander König; Uwe Spetzger
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.442

8.  Experience with a modular PEEK system for cervical vertebral body replacement.

Authors:  Stefan A König; Uwe Spetzger
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-03

9.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23

10.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cement Augmentation of Two-Level Lumbar Corpectomy Cage After Malposition: A Novel Salvage Procedure Technical Note.

Authors:  Mousa K Hamad; Jessica Ryvlin; Justin Langro; Aisha S Obeidallah; Jason Marin; Rafael De La Garza Ramos; Saikiran Murthy; Seon-Kyu Lee; Reza Yassari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.