| Literature DB >> 27782857 |
Eugénie Riesenkampff1, Wietske Luining2, Mike Seed2,3, Paweena Chungsomprasong2, Cedric Manlhiot2, Bernadette Elders2, Brian W McCrindle2, Shi-Joon Yoo2,3, Lars Grosse-Wortmann2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unfavorable left ventricular (LV) remodelling may be associated with adverse outcomes after Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. We sought to assess T1 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) markers of diffuse LV myocardial fibrosis in children after TOF repair, and associated factors.Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse fibrosis; T1 mapping; Tetralogy of Fallot
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27782857 PMCID: PMC5080785 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0290-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Characteristics of patient and controls and surgical information of patients
| Patients ( | Controls ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at CMR [years] | 13.9 ± 2.4 | 13.4 ± 2.6 | 0.54 |
| Gender [male; n (%)] | 19 (61 %) | 7 (44 %) | 0.53 |
| BSA [m2] | 1.47 ± 0.27 | 1.55 ± 0.30 | 0.41 |
| Heart rate [bpm] | 73 ± 11 | 76 ± 11 | 0.31 |
| Hematocrit | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.16 |
| QRS-duration [ms]a | 123 ± 24 | 87 ± 8 | <0.001 |
| Surgical information | |||
| Patient age at repair [months] | 6.3 (3.0–10.7) | n.a. | n.a. |
| Time since repair at CMR [years] | 13.2 ± 2.2 | n.a. | n.a. |
| TOF type [n (%)] | n.a. | n.a. | |
| TOF | 25 (81 %) | ||
| Type of repair [n (%)]b | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Transannular patch | 13 (43 %) | ||
| Bypass time [minutes]c | 136 ± 48 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Cross clamp time [minutes]c | 67 ± 19 | n.a. | n.a. |
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation, median (and interquartile range), or frequencies, as appropriate
Abbreviations: BSA body surface area, CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance, n.a. not applicable, TOF Tetralogy of Fallot
aQRS-duration from ECG was available in 26 patients and 11 controls
bType of repair unknown in one patient. One patient had a palliation prior to corrective surgery
cCardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times from 23 patients
Results from CMR and echocardiography
| Patients ( | Controls ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMR | |||
| RV enddiastolic volume [ml/m2] | 148 ± 40 | 93 ± 13 | <0.001 |
| RV endsystolic volume [ml/m2] | 75 ± 23 | 43 ± 8 | <0.001 |
| RV muscle mass [g/m2] | 39.4 ± 9.4 | n.a. | n.a. |
| RV ejection fraction [%] | 50 ± 5 | 53 ± 3 | <0.05 |
| LV enddiastolic volume [ml/m2] | 91 ± 12 | 89 ± 11 | 0.50 |
| LV endsystolic volume [ml/m2] | 41 ± 8 | 36 ± 6 | <0.05 |
| LV muscle mass [g/m2] | 46 ± 7 | 49 ± 9 | 0.29 |
| LV ejection fraction [%] | 55 ± 6 | 59 ± 4 | <0.01 |
| Pulmonary regurgitation [%] | 33 ± 16 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Z-Scores | |||
| RV enddiastolic volume | 3.42 (1.52–5.29) | −0.11 (−1.17–0.68) | <0.001 |
| RV endsystolic volume | 3.65 (1.52–4.51) | −0.05 (−0.33–0.98) | <0.001 |
| RV ejection fraction | −1.52 (−2.23– −0.69) | −1.04 (−1.29– −0.39) | <0.05 |
| LV enddiastolic volume | 0.62 ( −0.10–1.36) | 0.41 (−0.55–1.59) | 0.60 |
| LV endsystolic volume | 1.57 (−0.75–2.30) | 1.08 (−0.31–1.65) | <0.05 |
| LV muscle mass | −1.89 (−2.90– −0.94) | −0.96 (−2.43–0.36) | 0.24 |
| LV ejection fraction | −1.29 (−2.51– −0.80) | −0.32 (−1.41–0.41) | <0.01 |
| Echocardiography | |||
| RVSP [mmHg], | 44 ± 15 | n.a. | n.a. |
| RVOT-gradient [mmHg], | 32 ± 18 | n.a. | n.a. |
| TAPSE [mm], | 16.5 ± 3.5 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Grade of tricuspid insufficiency [n (%)] | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Trivial | 17 (55 %) | ||
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation, median (and interquartile range), or frequencies, as appropriate
Abbreviations: LV left ventricle, PT pulmonary trunk, RV right ventricle, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
ECV and native T1 results
| Patients |
| Controls |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native T1 (ms) | ||||||
| Entire left ventricle | mid | 974 ± 37 | 29 | 986 ± 29 | 15 | 0.26 |
| base | 982 ± 37 | 31 | 998 ± 25 | 15 | 0.10 | |
| Interventricular septum | mid | 990 ± 49 | 31 | 1000 ± 39 | 15 | 0.44 |
| base | 989 ± 43 | 31 | 999 ± 28 | 15 | 0.34 | |
| Left ventricular free wall | mid | 970 ± 50 | 31 | 989 ± 46 | 15 | 0.20 |
| base | 963 ± 52 | 30 | 983 ± 30 | 15 | 0.11 | |
| Extracellular volume (%) | ||||||
| Entire left ventricle | mid | 23.6 ± 3.3 | 28 | 23.4 ± 3.0 | 14 | 0.84 |
| base | 24.0 ± 3.2 | 28 | 22.9 ± 2.6 | 13 | 0.25 | |
| Interventricular septum | mid | 24.3 ± 3.7 | 30 | 22.8 ± 2.7 | 14 | 0.13 |
| base | 23.7 ± 3.3 | 29 | 23.1 ± 2.8 | 13 | 0.57 | |
| Left ventricular free wall | mid | 22.3 ± 3.8 | 30 | 23.1 ± 2.7 | 14 | 0.43 |
| base | 22.3 ± 3.9 | 27 | 21.5 ± 2.4 | 13 | 0.45 | |
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. The varying numbers n of available values for the different measurements is attributed to image quality, i.e., image quality of some native or post contrast T1 maps was reduced in parts
Fig. 1Inter- and intraobserver variabilities of native T1 and ECV. Inter- and intraobserver variabilities of native T1 and ECV measured in the entire LV in mid short axis. Abbreviations: COV = coefficient of variation; ECV = extracellular volume; LV = left ventricle; SD = standard deviation