Literature DB >> 27782713

Fiber Bragg gratings-based sensing for real-time needle tracking during MR-guided brachytherapy.

Maxence Borot de Battisti1, Baudouin Denis de Senneville2, Metha Maenhout1, Jan J W Lagendijk1, Marco van Vulpen1, Gilion Hautvast3, Dirk Binnekamp3, Marinus A Moerland1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The development of MR-guided high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is under investigation due to the excellent tumor and organs at risk visualization of MRI. However, MR-based localization of needles (including catheters or tubes) has inherently a low update rate and the required image interpretation can be hampered by signal voids arising from blood vessels or calcifications limiting the precision of the needle guidance and reconstruction. In this paper, a new needle tracking prototype is investigated using fiber Bragg gratings (FBG)-based sensing: this prototype involves a MR-compatible stylet composed of three optic fibers with nine sets of embedded FBG sensors each. This stylet can be inserted into brachytherapy needles and allows a fast measurement of the needle deflection. This study aims to assess the potential of FBG-based sensing for real-time needle (including catheter or tube) tracking during MR-guided intervention.
METHODS: First, the MR compatibility of FBG-based sensing and its accuracy was evaluated. Different known needle deflections were measured using FBG-based sensing during simultaneous MR-imaging. Then, a needle tracking procedure using FBG-based sensing was proposed. This procedure involved a MR-based calibration of the FBG-based system performed prior to the interventional procedure. The needle tracking system was assessed in an experiment with a moving phantom during MR imaging. The FBG-based system was quantified by comparing the gold-standard shapes, the shape manually segmented on MRI and the FBG-based measurements.
RESULTS: The evaluation of the MR compatibility of FBG-based sensing and its accuracy shows that the needle deflection could be measured with an accuracy of 0.27 mm on average. Besides, the FBG-based measurements were comparable to the uncertainty of MR-based measurements estimated at half the voxel size in the MR image. Finally, the mean(standard deviation) Euclidean distance between MR- and FBG-based needle position measurements was equal to 0.79 mm(0.37 mm). The update rate and latency of the FBG-based needle position measurement were 100 and 300 ms, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The FBG-based needle tracking procedure proposed in this paper is able to determine the position of the complete needle, under MR-imaging, with better accuracy and precision, higher update rate, and lower latency compared to current MR-based needle localization methods. This system would be eligible for MR-guided brachytherapy, in particular, for an improved needle guidance and reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782713     DOI: 10.1118/1.4961743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Shape accuracy of fiber optic sensing for medical devices characterized in bench experiments.

Authors:  Mischa Megens; Merel D Leistikow; Anneke van Dusschoten; Martin B van der Mark; Jeroen J L Horikx; Elbert G van Putten; Gert W 't Hooft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Navigation and visualisation with HoloLens in endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Verónica García-Vázquez; Felix von Haxthausen; Sonja Jäckle; Christian Schumann; Ivo Kuhlemann; Juljan Bouchagiar; Anna-Catharina Höfer; Florian Matysiak; Gereon Hüttmann; Jan Peter Goltz; Markus Kleemann; Floris Ernst; Marco Horn
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2018-10-04

3.  Design and analysis of a fiber-optic sensing system for shape reconstruction of a minimally invasive surgical needle.

Authors:  Aizhan Issatayeva; Aida Amantayeva; Wilfried Blanc; Daniele Tosi; Carlo Molardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Axially rigid steerable needle with compliant active tip control.

Authors:  M de Vries; J Sikorski; S Misra; J J van den Dobbelsteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.