Literature DB >> 27782699

Whole-remnant and maximum-voxel SPECT/CT dosimetry in 131I-NaI treatments of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Pablo Mínguez1, Glenn Flux2, José Genollá3, Alejandro Delgado3, Emilia Rodeño3, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the possible differences between SPECT/CT based whole-remnant and maximum-voxel dosimetry in patients receiving radio-iodine ablation treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
METHODS: Eighteen DTC patients were administered 1.11 GBq of 131I-NaI after near-total thyroidectomy and rhTSH stimulation. Two patients had two remnants, so in total dosimetry was performed for 20 sites. Three SPECT/CT scans were performed for each patient at 1, 2, and 3-7 days after administration. The activity, the remnant mass, and the maximum-voxel activity were determined from these images and from a recovery-coefficient curve derived from experimental phantom measurements. The cumulated activity was estimated using trapezoidal-exponential integration. Finally, the absorbed dose was calculated using S-values for unit-density spheres in whole-remnant dosimetry and S-values for voxels in maximum-voxel dosimetry.
RESULTS: The mean absorbed dose obtained from whole-remnant dosimetry was 40 Gy (range 2-176 Gy) and from maximum-voxel dosimetry 34 Gy (range 2-145 Gy). For any given patient, the activity concentrations for each of the three time-points were approximately the same for the two methods. The effective half-lives varied (R = 0.865), mainly due to discrepancies in estimation of the longer effective half-lives. On average, absorbed doses obtained from whole-remnant dosimetry were 1.2 ± 0.2 (1 SD) higher than for maximum-voxel dosimetry, mainly due to differences in the S-values. The method-related differences were however small in comparison to the wide range of absorbed doses obtained in patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple and consistent procedures for SPECT/CT based whole-volume and maximum-voxel dosimetry have been described, both based on experimentally determined recovery coefficients. Generally the results from the two approaches are consistent, although there is a small, systematic difference in the absorbed dose due to differences in the S-values, and some variability due to differences in the estimated effective half-lives, especially when the effective half-life is long. Irrespective of the method used, the patient absorbed doses obtained span over two orders of magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782699     DOI: 10.1118/1.4961742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  2 in total

1.  From fixed activities to personalized treatments in radionuclide therapy: lost in translation?

Authors:  G D Flux; K Sjogreen Gleisner; C Chiesa; M Lassmann; N Chouin; J Gear; M Bardiès; S Walrand; K Bacher; U Eberlein; M Ljungberg; L Strigari; E Visser; M W Konijnenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Variations in the practice of molecular radiotherapy and implementation of dosimetry: results from a European survey.

Authors:  Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Emiliano Spezi; Pavel Solny; Pablo Minguez Gabina; Francesco Cicone; Caroline Stokke; Carlo Chiesa; Maria Paphiti; Boudewijn Brans; Mattias Sandström; Jill Tipping; Mark Konijnenberg; Glenn Flux
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-12-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.