Adria Perez-Rovira1, Wieying Kuo2, Jens Petersen3, Harm A W M Tiddens2, Marleen de Bruijne4. 1. Departments of Medical Informatics, Radiology, and Paediatric Pulmonology, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark. 4. Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands and Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bronchiectasis and airway wall thickening are commonly assessed in computed tomography (CT) by comparing the airway size with the size of the accompanying artery. Thus, in order to automate the quantification of bronchiectasis and wall thickening following a similar principle, there is a need for methods that automatically segment the airway and vascular trees, measure their size, and pair each airway branch with its accompanying artery. METHODS: This paper combines and extends existing techniques to present a fully automated pipeline that, given a thoracic chest CT, segments, measures, and pairs airway branches with the accompanying artery, then quantifies airway wall thickening and bronchiectasis by measuring the wall-artery ratio (WAR) and lumen and outer wall airway-artery ratio (AAR). Measurements that do not use the artery size for normalization are also extracted, including wall area percentage (WAP), wall thickness ratio (WTR), and airway diameters. RESULTS: The method was thoroughly evaluated using 8000 manual annotations of airway-artery pairs from 24 full-inspiration pediatric CT scans (12 diseased and 12 controls). Limits of agreement between the automatically and manually measured diameters were comparable to interobserver limits of agreement. Differences in automatically obtained WAR, AAR, WAP, and WTR between bronchiectatic subjects and controls were similar as when manual annotations were used: WAR and outer AAR were significantly higher in the bronchiectatic subjects (p < 0.05), but lumen AAR, WAP, and WTR were not. Only measurements that use artery size for normalization led to significant differences between groups, highlighting the importance of airway-artery pairing. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automatic method presented in this paper could replace time-consuming manual annotations and visual scoring methods to quantify abnormal widening and thickening of airways.
PURPOSE: Bronchiectasis and airway wall thickening are commonly assessed in computed tomography (CT) by comparing the airway size with the size of the accompanying artery. Thus, in order to automate the quantification of bronchiectasis and wall thickening following a similar principle, there is a need for methods that automatically segment the airway and vascular trees, measure their size, and pair each airway branch with its accompanying artery. METHODS: This paper combines and extends existing techniques to present a fully automated pipeline that, given a thoracic chest CT, segments, measures, and pairs airway branches with the accompanying artery, then quantifies airway wall thickening and bronchiectasis by measuring the wall-artery ratio (WAR) and lumen and outer wall airway-artery ratio (AAR). Measurements that do not use the artery size for normalization are also extracted, including wall area percentage (WAP), wall thickness ratio (WTR), and airway diameters. RESULTS: The method was thoroughly evaluated using 8000 manual annotations of airway-artery pairs from 24 full-inspiration pediatric CT scans (12 diseased and 12 controls). Limits of agreement between the automatically and manually measured diameters were comparable to interobserver limits of agreement. Differences in automatically obtained WAR, AAR, WAP, and WTR between bronchiectatic subjects and controls were similar as when manual annotations were used: WAR and outer AAR were significantly higher in the bronchiectatic subjects (p < 0.05), but lumen AAR, WAP, and WTR were not. Only measurements that use artery size for normalization led to significant differences between groups, highlighting the importance of airway-artery pairing. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automatic method presented in this paper could replace time-consuming manual annotations and visual scoring methods to quantify abnormal widening and thickening of airways.
Authors: Jason C Woods; Jim M Wild; Mark O Wielpütz; John P Clancy; Hiroto Hatabu; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Edwin J R van Beek; Talissa A Altes Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Luciano Folador; Felipe S Torres; Juliana F Zampieri; Betina C Machado; Marli M Knorst; Marcelo B Gazzana Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Harm A W M Tiddens; Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou; Joe McIntosh; J Stuart Elborn; Eitan Kerem; Nynke Bouma; Jochem Bosch; Mariette Kemner-van de Corput Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240