Literature DB >> 27782557

Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution.

John R Kirtley1, Lisa Paulius2, Aaron J Rosenberg1, Johanna C Palmstrom1, Connor M Holland1, Eric M Spanton3, Daniel Schiessl4, Colin L Jermain5, Jonathan Gibbons5, Y-K-K Fung6, Martin E Huber7, Daniel C Ralph5, Mark B Ketchen8, Gerald W Gibson6, Kathryn A Moler1.   

Abstract

Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) microscopy has excellent magnetic field sensitivity, but suffers from modest spatial resolution when compared with other scanning probes. This spatial resolution is determined by both the size of the field sensitive area and the spacing between this area and the sample surface. In this paper we describe scanning SQUID susceptometers that achieve sub-micron spatial resolution while retaining a white noise floor flux sensitivity of ≈2μΦ0/Hz1/2. This high spatial resolution is accomplished by deep sub-micron feature sizes, well shielded pickup loops fabricated using a planarized process, and a deep etch step that minimizes the spacing between the sample surface and the SQUID pickup loop. We describe the design, modeling, fabrication, and testing of these sensors. Although sub-micron spatial resolution has been achieved previously in scanning SQUID sensors, our sensors not only achieve high spatial resolution but also have integrated modulation coils for flux feedback, integrated field coils for susceptibility measurements, and batch processing. They are therefore a generally applicable tool for imaging sample magnetization, currents, and susceptibilities with higher spatial resolution than previous susceptometers.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782557     DOI: 10.1063/1.4961982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0034-6748            Impact factor:   1.523


  7 in total

1.  Superconducting Bio-Inspired Au-Nanowire-Based Neurons.

Authors:  Olga V Skryabina; Andrey E Schegolev; Nikolay V Klenov; Sergey V Bakurskiy; Andrey G Shishkin; Stepan V Sotnichuk; Kirill S Napolskii; Ivan A Nazhestkin; Igor I Soloviev; Mikhail Yu Kupriyanov; Vasily S Stolyarov
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 2.  Strain-Modulated Magnetism in MoS2.

Authors:  Hongtao Ren; Gang Xiang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Sensitive Readout for Microfluidic High-Throughput Applications using Scanning SQUID Microscopy.

Authors:  Shai Wissberg; Maria Ronen; Ziv Oren; Doron Gerber; Beena Kalisky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Magnetic field detection limits for ultraclean graphene Hall sensors.

Authors:  Brian T Schaefer; Lei Wang; Alexander Jarjour; Kenji Watanabe; Takashi Taniguchi; Paul L McEuen; Katja C Nowack
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Detection of Topological Spin Textures via Nonlinear Magnetic Responses.

Authors:  Mariia Stepanova; Jan Masell; Erik Lysne; Peggy Schoenherr; Laura Köhler; Michael Paulsen; Alireza Qaiumzadeh; Naoya Kanazawa; Achim Rosch; Yoshinori Tokura; Arne Brataas; Markus Garst; Dennis Meier
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Influence of Resonances on the Noise Performance of SQUID Susceptometers.

Authors:  Samantha I Davis; John R Kirtley; Kathryn A Moler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Fabrication Process for Deep Submicron SQUID Circuits with Three Independent Niobium Layers.

Authors:  Silke Wolter; Julian Linek; Josepha Altmann; Thomas Weimann; Sylke Bechstein; Reinhold Kleiner; Jörn Beyer; Dieter Koelle; Oliver Kieler
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.