| Literature DB >> 27782305 |
Yaron Hellman1, Adnan S Malik1, Kathleen A Lane2, Changyu Shen2, I-Wen Wang3, Thomas C Wozniak3, Zubair A Hashmi3, Sarah D Munson1, Jeanette Pickrell1, Marco A Caccamo1, Irmina Gradus-Pizlo1, Azam Hadi1.
Abstract
Currently, blood pressure (BP) measurement is obtained noninvasively in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) by placing a Doppler probe over the brachial or radial artery with inflation and deflation of a manual BP cuff. We hypothesized that replacing the Doppler probe with a finger-based pulse oximeter can yield BP measurements similar to the Doppler derived mean arterial pressure (MAP). We conducted a prospective study consisting of patients with contemporary continuous flow LVADs. In a small pilot phase I inpatient study, we compared direct arterial line measurements with an automated blood pressure (ABP) cuff, Doppler and pulse oximeter derived MAP. Our main phase II study included LVAD outpatients with a comparison between Doppler, ABP, and pulse oximeter derived MAP. A total of five phase I and 36 phase II patients were recruited during February-June 2014. In phase I, the average MAP measured by pulse oximeter was closer to arterial line MAP rather than Doppler (P = 0.06) or ABP (P < 0.01). In phase II, pulse oximeter MAP (96.6 mm Hg) was significantly closer to Doppler MAP (96.5 mm Hg) when compared to ABP (82.1 mm Hg) (P = 0.0001). Pulse oximeter derived blood pressure measurement may be as reliable as Doppler in patients with continuous flow LVADs.Entities:
Keywords: -Left ventricular assist device; -Pulse oximeter; Blood pressure
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27782305 DOI: 10.1111/aor.12790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Artif Organs ISSN: 0160-564X Impact factor: 3.094