Literature DB >> 27782305

Pulse Oximeter Derived Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Yaron Hellman1, Adnan S Malik1, Kathleen A Lane2, Changyu Shen2, I-Wen Wang3, Thomas C Wozniak3, Zubair A Hashmi3, Sarah D Munson1, Jeanette Pickrell1, Marco A Caccamo1, Irmina Gradus-Pizlo1, Azam Hadi1.   

Abstract

Currently, blood pressure (BP) measurement is obtained noninvasively in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) by placing a Doppler probe over the brachial or radial artery with inflation and deflation of a manual BP cuff. We hypothesized that replacing the Doppler probe with a finger-based pulse oximeter can yield BP measurements similar to the Doppler derived mean arterial pressure (MAP). We conducted a prospective study consisting of patients with contemporary continuous flow LVADs. In a small pilot phase I inpatient study, we compared direct arterial line measurements with an automated blood pressure (ABP) cuff, Doppler and pulse oximeter derived MAP. Our main phase II study included LVAD outpatients with a comparison between Doppler, ABP, and pulse oximeter derived MAP. A total of five phase I and 36 phase II patients were recruited during February-June 2014. In phase I, the average MAP measured by pulse oximeter was closer to arterial line MAP rather than Doppler (P = 0.06) or ABP (P < 0.01). In phase II, pulse oximeter MAP (96.6 mm Hg) was significantly closer to Doppler MAP (96.5 mm Hg) when compared to ABP (82.1 mm Hg) (P = 0.0001). Pulse oximeter derived blood pressure measurement may be as reliable as Doppler in patients with continuous flow LVADs.
© 2016 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  -Left ventricular assist device; -Pulse oximeter; Blood pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782305     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].

Authors:  Kevin Pilarczyk; Udo Boeken; Andreas Beckmann; Andreas Markewitz; P Christian Schulze; Martin Pin; Ingo Gräff; Sebastian Schmidt; Birk Runge; Hans-Jörg Busch; Michael R Preusch; Nils Haake; Gereon Schälte; Jan Gummert; Guido Michels
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Impact and Measurement of Blood Pressure During Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: The Pressure Is On!

Authors:  Omar Saeed; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.