| Literature DB >> 27782122 |
Xiang Zhang1, Hongchao He1, Guoliang Lu2, Tianyuan Xu1, Liang Qin1, Xianjin Wang1, Xingwei Jin1, Boke Liu1, Zhonghua Zhao3, Zhoujun Shen1,4, Yuan Shao1,2.
Abstract
The development and progression of bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is closely related to bladder inflammation. Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) is associated with bladder inflammation in BPS/IC. We investigated the effect of specific inhibition of ICAM-1 using an anti-ICAM-1 antibody (AIA) on bladder inflammation in a rat model of severe non-bacterial cystitis (NBC) resembling BPS/IC by evaluating the bladder inflammation grade, mast cell infiltration and related cytokines and receptors. We also compared the effects of AIA with the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib and the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) inhibitor aprepitant. Our NBC model was established by intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide combined with intravesical protamine/lipopolysaccharide, which resulted in severe bladder inflammation and increased mast cell infiltration, similar to the pathological changes of BPS/IC. Inhibition of ICAM-1 by AIA significantly decreased the bladder inflammation grade and mast cell counts, which was accompanied by a reduction of purinergic receptors (P2X2/P2X3), prostaglandin E2, EP1/EP2 receptors, TNF-α, NK1R, and ICAM-1. Moreover, AIA showed superior effects to those of celecoxib and aprepitant treatment in improving the bladder inflammatory response. Our results suggest that ICAM-1 may play a critical role in bladder inflammation in severe NBC and may be used as a novel therapeutic target in non-bacterial bladder inflammation such as BPS/IC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27782122 PMCID: PMC5080624 DOI: 10.1038/srep35672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Bladder inflammatory changes in rats.
HE stain, x100 magnification. (A) Normal control rats (group 1) had no edema or inflammation. (B) Cystitis model rats (group 2) had obvious inflammation, including extensive submucosa edema and marked microhemorrhage accompanied by a significantly thinner urothelium. (C) Model + celecoxib rats (group 3) had severe vascular proliferation, microhemorrhage, and errhysis with edema of the submucosa. (D) Model + aprepitant rats (group 4) showed slight congestion of the microangium and severe congestion of the submucosa. (E) Model + AIA rats (group 5) had no obvious changes except for slight edema.
Figure 2Distribution of mast cells (arrows).
Toluidine blue stain, x400 magnification. (A) Control group. No obvious mast cells were observed. (B) Cystitis model group. Several mast cells were observed in the mucosa of the bladder tissue. (C) Model + AIA group. Only one mast cell was detected. AIA: anti-ICAM-1 antibody.
Bladder Inflammation Grade and Mast Cell Counts.
| Bladder Inflammation Grade | Control (7) | Model (9) | Model + Clb (10) | Model + Apt (10) | Model + AIA (10) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | P vs Control | Grade | P vs Control | P vs Model | Grade | P vs Control | P vs Model | Grade | P vs Control | P vs Model | P vs Clb | P vs Apt | ||
| 1 | 7 | 0 | < 0.001 | 0 | <0.001 | 0.079 | 0 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 2 | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.123 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||
| 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Mast cell | 1 (0–1) | 5 (3–7) | <0.001 | 4 (3–5) | <0.001 | 0.028 | 3 (2–4) | <0.001 | 0.001 | 2 (1–3) | 0.007 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.019 |
The data are presented as the median with ranges in parentheses. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare nonparametric variables and pairwise differences. A value of P < 0.05 was considered a significant difference. The three intervention groups (Celecoxib, Aprepitant, and AIA) represent NBC rats that received each drug. Clb: Celecoxib; Apt: Aprepitant; AIA: Anti-ICAM-1 antibody Table 2. Cytokines and Receptors.
Cytokines and Receptors.
| Cytokine or Receptor | Control (7) | Model (9) | Model + Clb (10) | Model + Apt (10) | Model + AIA (10) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SE | M ± SE | P vs Control | M ± SE | P vs Control | P vs Model | M ± SE | P vs Control | P vs Model | M ± SE | P vs Control | P vs Model | P vs Clb | P vs Apt | |
| P2X3 (ng/ml) | 42.11 ± 7.21 | 280.87 ± 0.17 | <0.001 | 182.74 ± 21.32 | 0.001 | 0.011 | 238.57 ± 21.27 | <0.001 | 0.459 | 140.46 ± 18.09 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.745 | 0.024 |
| P2Y2 (ng/ml) | 93.47 ± 0.14 | 354.70 ± 20.75 | <0.001 | 169.40 ± 12.45 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 188.12 ± 0.15 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 122.33 ± 14.12 | 0.429 | <0.001 | 0.183 | 0.010 |
| PGE2 (ng/ml) | 15.06 ± 0.02 | 160.35 ± 19.78 | <0.001 | 51.29 ± 4.61 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 30.19 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 18.80 ± 0.79 | 0.009 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| EP1R (ng/ml) | 7.30 ± 0.17 | 79.75 ± 9.44 | <0.001 | 26.17 ± 2.66 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 16.28 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 11.59 ± 0.65 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| EP2R (ng/ml) | 5.04 ± 0.01 | 80.21 ± 9.99 | <0.001 | 30.58 ± 4.87 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 20.04 ± 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 8.54 ± 1.50 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
| TNF-α (ng/ml) | 10.83 ± 0.16 | 123.14 ± 15.99 | <0.001 | 51.30 ± 14.82 | <0.001 | 0.040 | 28.53 ± 2.78 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 21.82 ± 0.84 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.046 | 0.292 |
| NK1R (ng/ml) | 15.42 ± 0.10 | 77.36 ± 7.97 | <0.001 | 32.30 ± 1.85 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 32.97 ± 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 21.99 ± 1.43 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| ICAM-1 (pg/ml) | 40.28 ± 5.76 | 334.18 ± 41.78 | <0.001 | 201.37 ± 20.16 | <0.001 | 0.118 | 150.38 ± 16.30 | <0.001 | 0.017 | 125.06 ± 15.98 | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.076 | 0.942 |
The data are presented as the means ± standard error (M ± SE). Two-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s T multiple comparison test, was conducted to analyze parametric data. A value of P < 0.05 was considered a significant difference. The three intervention groups (Celecoxib, Aprepitant and AIA) represent NBC rats that received each drug. Clb: Celecoxib; Apt: Aprepitant; AIA: Anti-ICAM-1 antibody.