| Literature DB >> 27781156 |
Elena Maggi1, Mario Cappiello2, Antonella Del Corso2, Francesca Lenzarini2, Eleonora Peroni2, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organisms are facing increasing levels of environmental stress under climate change that may severely affect the functioning of biological systems at different levels of organization. Growing evidence suggests that reduction in body size is a universal response of organisms to global warming. However, a clear understanding of whether extreme climate events will impose selection directly on phenotypic plastic responses and how these responses affect ecological interactions has remained elusive.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant mechanisms; Ecological scaling; Extreme climatic events; Interaction strength; Phenotypic plasticity; Rocky intertidal gastropod
Year: 2016 PMID: 27781156 PMCID: PMC5075701 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Mixed-effect models on total glutathione, catalase and glutathione reductase concentrations, and growth rate of limpets from low-shore habitat.
Limpets from fences were compared to limpets marked and disturbed (PC, procedural control) in open plots. A total of three fences or open plots were deployed within each of three random areas.
| Total glutathione | Catalase | Glutathione reductase | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | Coefficient (SE) | ||||
| Intercept | 0.773 (0.111) | 33.849 (6.769) | 0.007 (0.001) | 17.86 (0.552) | |
| Fences | −0.142 (0.159) | −3.675 (9.975) | 0.001 (0.001) | −0.283 (0.810) | |
| Random effects | Variances (SD) | ||||
| Area | 0.000 (0.000) | 8.141 (2.853) | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.000 (0.000) | |
| Plot(Area) | 0.082 (0.287) | 282.609 (16.811) | 0.000 (0.001) | 0.000 (0.000) | |
| Residual | 0.065 (0.256) | 377.246 (19.423) | 0.000 (0.002) | 4.922 (2.218) | |
Notes.
p < 0.001.
Mixed-effect models on total glutathione, catalase and glutathione reductase concentrations, and growth rate of limpets at different heights on the shore (low-, mid- or high-shore).
For each height on the shore, three plots (=fences) were deployed within each of three random areas. For the low-shore habitat, limpets from three additional plots (=open plots, PC) within each of three random areas were included in the analyses.
| Total glutathione | Catalase | Glutathione reductase | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | Coefficient (SE) | ||||
| Intercept | 0.707 (0.066) | 29.623 (4.301) | 0.007 (0.001) | 17.363 (0.449) | |
| Height | −0.008 (0.004) | −0.043 (0.263) | −0.000 (0.000) | −0.015 (0.026) | |
| Random effects | Variances (SD) | ||||
| Area | 0.000 (0.000) | 49.09 (7.006) | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.470 (0.685) | |
| Plot(Area) | 0.058 (0.242) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.000 (0.001) | 0.383 (0.619) | |
| Residual | 0.047 (0.217) | 520.85 (22.822) | 0.000 (0.003) | 4.444 (2.108) | |
Notes.
<0.05.
p < 0.001.
Mixed-effect models on total glutathione, catalase and glutathione reductase concentrations, and growth rate of limpets at different heights on the shore (low-, mid- or high-shore).
To control for the effect of newly introduced limpets compensating for missing ones, duration to treatment conditions of individual limpets was included as a covariate (Permanence). For each height on the shore, three plots (=fences) were deployed within each of three random areas. For the low-shore habitat, limpets from three additional plots (=open plots, PC) within each of three random areas were included in the analyses. For each variable, the model was compared to the reduced model without the covariate (see Table 2), by means of a log-likelihood ratio test.
| Total glutathione | Catalase | Glutathione reductase | Growth rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effects | Coefficient (SE) | ||||
| Intercept | 0.384 (0.244) | 14.957 (17.447) | 0.009 (0.002) | 0.006 (0.053) | |
| Height | −0.008 (0.004) | −0.059 (0.293) | −0.000 (0.000) | −0.002 (0.001) | |
| Permanence | 0.005 (0.004) | 0.242 (0.278) | −0.000 (0.000) | 0.001 (0.001) | |
| Random effects | Variances (SD) | ||||
| Area | 0.000 (0.000) | 88.36 (9.40) | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.000 (0.000) | |
| Plot(Area) | 0.055 (0.235) | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.003 (0.053) | |
| Residual | 0.047 (0.218) | 502.69 (22.42) | 0.000 (0.003) | 0.006 (0.079) | |
| LogLik test | 1.182 | 0.607 | 0.739 | 1.138 | |
Notes.
<0.05.
p < 0.001.
Figure 1Physiological effects of desiccation stress scale-up to the population and assemblage levels in rocky intertidal limpets.
(A) Total glutathione concentration, (B) growth rate and (C) per capita interaction strength for limpets exposed to increasing levels of desiccation stress (the lower the interaction strength, the greater the impact of limpets within enclosures compared to the surrounding open rock surface). In (A) data are means and sample standard errors (sample size was 28 individuals for the low-shore and ranged between 11 and 14 for the mid- and high-shore). In (B) and (C) data are bootstrapped means ± 95% CIs, as well as mean values from observed data (+).