Paul S Page1, Alexander C Cambon2, Robert F James1. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Ky., USA. 2. Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, Ky., USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) for the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) has demonstrated variable results for improving visual acuity and remains controversial. Despite limited evidence, time from symptom onset to thrombolysis is believed to be an important factor in predicting visual improvement after IAT. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted and individual subject level data were extracted from relevant studies. From these, a secondary analysis was performed. Initial and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scores were either abstracted directly from relevant studies or converted from provided Snellen chart scores. Change in logMAR scores was used to determine overall treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Data on 118 patients undergoing IAT from five studies were evaluated. Median logMAR improvement in visual acuity was -0.400 (p < 0.001). There was no significant association between logMAR change and time to treatment when time (hours) was described as a continuous variable or described categorically [0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12+ h; or 0-6, 6-12, 12+ h]. CONCLUSION: The visual improvement observed in this series had no relationship to the time from symptom onset to treatment with IAT. This suggests that patients may have the possibility for improvement even with delayed presentation to the neurointerventionalist. Other factors, such as completeness of retinal occlusion, may be more important than time to treatment. Additional studies to determine optimal patient selection criteria for the endovascular treatment of acute CRAO are needed.
BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) for the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) has demonstrated variable results for improving visual acuity and remains controversial. Despite limited evidence, time from symptom onset to thrombolysis is believed to be an important factor in predicting visual improvement after IAT. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted and individual subject level data were extracted from relevant studies. From these, a secondary analysis was performed. Initial and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scores were either abstracted directly from relevant studies or converted from provided Snellen chart scores. Change in logMAR scores was used to determine overall treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Data on 118 patients undergoing IAT from five studies were evaluated. Median logMAR improvement in visual acuity was -0.400 (p < 0.001). There was no significant association between logMAR change and time to treatment when time (hours) was described as a continuous variable or described categorically [0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12+ h; or 0-6, 6-12, 12+ h]. CONCLUSION: The visual improvement observed in this series had no relationship to the time from symptom onset to treatment with IAT. This suggests that patients may have the possibility for improvement even with delayed presentation to the neurointerventionalist. Other factors, such as completeness of retinal occlusion, may be more important than time to treatment. Additional studies to determine optimal patient selection criteria for the endovascular treatment of acute CRAO are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Central retinal artery occlusion; Fibrinolysis; Infusions; Intra-arterial thrombolysis; Therapeutic thrombolysis; Time to treatment
Authors: J Weber; L Remonda; H P Mattle; U Koerner; R W Baumgartner; M Sturzenegger; C Ozdoba; F Koerner; G Schroth Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Paul S Page; Nicolas K Khattar; Andrew C White; Alexander C Cambon; Guy N Brock; Shesh N Rai; Robert F James Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 4.003