Literature DB >> 27780680

Diseases affecting patients returning from abroad: Experience of a travel clinic in Japan from 2004 to 2014.

Yukihiro Yoshimura1, Nobuyuki Miyata2, Makiko Miyajima2, Yohei Sakamoto2, Yuichiro Amano2, Natsuo Tachikawa2.   

Abstract

The number of patients returning from or staying abroad is likely to increase in the future. We performed a retrospective study of patients returning from abroad in our travel clinic in Japan. All patients presenting within 6 months of traveling abroad between 2004 and 2014 were included in the present study. A total of 2374 (mean age, 35 years) patients were seen by doctors specializing in treating infectious diseases. Of these, 918 were females and 87 of them lived abroad. Diagnoses and exposure regions were recorded for all patients. The most frequent region visited before attending our clinic was Southeast Asia (n = 1050, 44%), with a median duration for staying abroad of 8 days. The major purposes for overseas travel were tourism (n = 1302, 55%) and business (n = 684, 29%). Of the 2399 individual diagnoses made, the most frequent were diseases of the gastrointestinal system (n = 1083, 45%), skin and soft tissue (n = 440, 18%), systemic febrile disease without specific systems (419, 18%), and the respiratory system (353, 15%). The relative incidences of specific diseases changed drastically due to significant disease outbreaks, such as pandemic influenza in 2009. Exposure regions remained relatively constant throughout the study period, except for Japan. Vaccine-preventable diseases accounted for 5.3% of all the diseases, and 402 (26%) patients received pre-travel consultation and prophylaxis with vaccines and/or anti-malarial drug. We should make an effort to make more people notice the risk of travel and properly perform prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2016 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infectious disease; Japan; Travel

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27780680      PMCID: PMC7128327          DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


Introduction

Each year, more than 16 million Japanese residents travel abroad and more than 19 million foreign people visit Japan according to Japan National Tourism Organization. The number of foreign tourists traveling to Japan has been increasing, with more patients visiting clinics in Japan after or during travel. There is a lack of published small case series regarding infectious and non-infectious diseases among patients visiting travel clinics in Japan [1], [2], [3]. Our clinic is a member of the global travel-associated disease surveillance network “GeoSentinel,” which has recently reported large-scale studies on ill travelers [4]. However, most of the data are provided by European and North American clinics, and the report does not reveal the patients and diseases in real settings, such as the travel clinics in Japan. Accordingly, we evaluated the characteristics of patients visiting our travel clinic following recent travel abroad to help improve the clinical practice of Japanese doctors and establish prevention strategies.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients attending our clinic between 2004 and 2014 who had a history of abroad travels within 6 months of their initial presentation. Our clinic is located in Yokohama, Japan's second most populated city (over 3 million residents), approximately 40 km south of Tokyo. Our hospital is a 650-bed community-based acute care teaching facility, and our clinic is run by 2–4 doctors for infectious disease, with inputs from other specialties, such as dermatology and pediatrics. We obtained data regarding patient demographics, travel histories, reasons for most recent overseas travel, and pre-travel vaccinations using a questionnaire for all patients (pre-travel information was added to the questionnaire in 2006). Regions were classified as East Asia (except Japan), Southeast Asia, South Asia, Oceania, Middle East, Europe, Africa, North America, and Latin America. Reasons for traveling abroad included tourism, business, study, missionary or volunteer work, visiting friends and relatives (VFR), and immigration or residence. VFR is defined as a condition when people visit a foreign country to see friends, family, or relatives; it does not depend on where they were born, how developed the foreign country is or which they migrated or not. In cases where there were multiple reasons, the most important reason was considered. Physicians determined exposure regions according to clinical course, travel history, and infection window periods. Therefore, potential exposure regions included Japan, airplanes, or none (disease not associated with any specific exposure). Diagnoses were made according to clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings, with every effort taken to determine the underlying etiologies. For example, in cases where acute bacterial colitis was suspected but no pathogen was detected, the final diagnosis was recorded as acute colitis of unknown etiology. Diseases were classified according to organ system as systemic febrile (no specific organ), respiratory, gastrointestinal, skin and soft tissue, hepatobiliary, genitourinary, and neurological diseases. When patients attended our clinic in the recovery phase, we used information from clinical correspondence to determine their underlying etiology. Real-time PCR was used to detect the pathogenic gene of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains. This study is performed independently of GeoSentinel, which collects information only on travel-associated diseases. This study was approved by our institutional review board.

Results

A total of 2374 patients were seen at our clinic during the study period (Table 1 ). The mean age of patients was 35 ± 14 years, with 918 people female (39%). Of the 2374 included patients, 2251 (95%) were Japanese, 120 (5.1%) were born in foreign countries (2 Japanese) and 87 (3.7%) lived abroad (57 Japanese). The most frequently traveled region before clinic visit was Southeast Asia (n = 1050, 44%), whilst 102 patients (4.3%) had traveled to multiple regions. The median duration of overseas travel was 8 days (0–27480 days). The predominant reasons for overseas travel were tourism (n = 1302, 55%), business (n = 684, 29%), and VFR (n = 209, 9%).
Table 1

Demographic data.

Number of patients2374
Age [years old]35 ± 14
Female918 (39%)
Born abroad120 (5.1%)
Living abroad87 (3.7%)
Staying regions
 Southeast Asia1050 (44%)
 South Asia367 (15%)
 Africa281 (12%)
 East Asia245 (10%)
 North America94 (4.0%)
 Europe84 (3.5%)
 Oceania72 (3.0%)
 Latin America68 (2.9%)
 Middle East8 (0.34%)
 Multiple104 (4.4%)
 Unknown2 (0.08%)
Median staying duration [days]8 (1–27480)
Staying purpose
 Tourism1302 (55%)
 Business684 (29%)
 Visiting friends and relatives209 (8.8%)
 Study66 (2.8%)
 Missionary/volunteer43 (1.8%)
 Residence39 (1.6%)
 Immigrant5 (0.21%)
 Unknown26 (1.1%)

±SD, a–b: minimum to maximum.

Demographic data. ±SD, a–b: minimum to maximum. The highest number of patients seen per year was in 2007, with the lowest number seen in 2010. The number of patients has increased since 2012 (Table 2 ). Of the 2399 diagnoses made in our clinic, the most frequently affected organ system was the gastrointestinal system, followed by skin and soft tissue, and systemic febrile diseases. Acute and chronic diarrhea were the most frequently observed gastrointestinal diseases, with fewer cases of enteric fever, esophagitis, and gastritis (Table 3 ). Causative agents identified in cases of gastrointestinal disease included Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and diarrheagenic E. coli, with Giardia intestinalis being the most frequently observed parasitic infection (Table 3). Three cases of irritable bowel syndrome and one case of drug-induced (atovaquone/proguanil) diarrhea were also observed. The majority of skin/soft tissue diseases were caused by animal exposure with or without post-exposure prophylaxis against rabies, insects bite, and lymphadenitis (Table 4 ). The predominant sources of animal exposure were dogs, monkeys, and cats, with squirrels, sheep, lions, donkeys, bats, and boars identified as less frequent sources. Systemic febrile diseases are shown in Table 5 . A total of 81 cases of dengue fever, 76 cases of malaria, 4 cases of measles, 4 cases of chikungunya fever, 4 cases of leptospirosis, and 1 case of murine typhus were diagnosed. Respiratory diseases were predominantly unspecified upper respiratory infections or influenza (Table 6 ). Bronchitis and pneumonia were observed in 34 and 26 cases respectively. Frequent causative agents identified in cases of pneumonia included Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Cases of genitourinary diseases included 10 cases of urinary tract infection and 2 cases of prostatitis (Table 7 ). There was one case of a foreign doctor developing acute pseudomonas prostatitis. Hepatobiliary diseases included hepatitis and biliary infection (Table 8 ). Hepatitis A virus was the most frequent cause of hepatitis. The predominant neurological disease was aseptic meningitis (Table 9 ). The case of rabies developed right shoulder pain, cough, anxiety, and confusion 3 months after a dog bite in the Philippines. He was diagnosed with rabies and provided with intensive care, although eventually died. Data pertaining to infrequent diseases, such as endocrine, bone/joint, ophthalmological, otological, and other diseases, are shown in Table 10 . There were 2 cases of newly diagnosed HIV infection. Diseases rarely diagnosed in Japan but observed in the present study included rabies, cutaneous leishmaniasis, melioidosis, and murine typhus. The most frequent regions of exposure were Southeast Asia (n = 1014, 43%), South Asia (n = 377, 16%), Africa (n = 259, 11%), East Asia (n = 225, 9.4%), and “unspecified” (n = 106, 4.5%; Table 11 ). Outcomes were generally good in the present study, with only one fatal case of rabies and 220 (9.5%) patients admitted to hospital. Pre-travel vaccination or anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis was performed in 394 (25%) and 13 (0.8%) patients, respectively. Vaccine-preventable diseases were diagnosed in 127 cases, including influenza (81), typhoid fever (17), hepatitis A (7), rubella (6), varicella (5), measles (4), pneumococcal pneumonia (3), tuberculosis (2), mumps (1) and rabies (1).
Table 2

Organ-system syndrome by year.

Systems20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014Total
Gastrointestinal118131145145786859907688851083 (45%)
Skin/soft tissue1324387852333844432849440 (18%)
Systemic febrile3637324139252934355061419 (18%)
Respiratory3017352938771818232345353 (15%)
Genitourinary1152100213218 (0.75%)
Hepatobiliary2232422000017 (0.71%)
Neurological0120201202313 (0.54%)
Other2203222312221 (0.88%)
Healthy2520444622435 (1.5%)



Total2042202623002202111531991811982512399
Table 3

Gastrointestinal diseases.

Syndromic diagnosis
Esophagitis1
Gastritis4
Enterocolitis1043
Enteric fever33
Others2
Subtotal1083
Causative agents
BacteriaCampylobacter spp.
 C. jejuni113
 C. coli5
 C. sp. unknown4
Salmonella spp.
 Non Typhi Salmonella spp.26
 S. enterica serotype Typhi17
 S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A16
Shigella spp.
 S. sonnei45
 S. flexneri8
 S. dysenteriae1
Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli
 Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)39
 Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAggEC)3
 Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC)2
 Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC)2
 Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)1
Plesiomonas shigelloides26
Vibrio spp.
 V. parahaemolyticus10
 V. cholerae O1 (cholera toxin+)7
 V. cholerae non O1 & O1392
 V. sp. unknown1
Aeromonas spp.
 A. hydrophila6
 A. sobria2
 A. sp. unknown1
ProtozoaGiardia intestinalis24
Entamoeba histolytica22
Blastocystis hominis2
Endolimax nana2
Cryptosporidium parvum1
HelminthAscaris lumbricoides4
Taenia saginata3
Trichuris trichiura2
Heterophyes heterophyes1
Enterobius vermicularis1
Schistosoma sp.1
Tape worm1
Metagonimus yokogawai1
Drug-inducedAtovaquone/proguanil1
Table 4

Skin/soft tissue diseases.

Animal bite/scratch388
 Dog304
 Monkey39
 Cat38
 Others7
Insect bite10
Lymphadenitis6
Toxicoderma4
Subcutaneous abscess4
 Streptococcus pyogenes2
 Bacteroides sp.1
 Staphylococcus aureus1
Cutaneous larva migrans3
Cutaneous injury3
Urticaria3
Tick bite2
Cellulitis2
Sun burn2
Cutaneous leishmaniasis1
Others8
Table 5

Systemic febrile disease.

Viral infection284
Bacterial infection11
Parasitic infection76
Others7
Unknown41



Etiologic diagnosis
Dengue fever81
Epstein-Bar virus infection11
Rubella6
Varicella5
Measles4
Chikungunya fever4
Cytomegalovirus infection2
Hand foot mouth disease2
Bacteremia4
 Salmonella spp.2
 Enterobacter cloacae1
 Escherichia coli1
Leptospirosis4
Melioidosis1
Lyme disease1
Rickettsial diseases4
 Rickettsia typhi1
 Rickettsia rickettsii1
 Unknown2
Malaria76
 Plasmodium falciparum41
 P. vivax26
 P. ovale7
 Unknown6
 Multiple species4
Malignant lymphoma1
Adult-onset Still's disease1
Polymyalgia rheumatica1
Table 6

Respiratory diseases.

Pneumonia26
 Haemophilus influenzae6
 Streptococcus pneumoniae4
 Mycoplasma pneumoniae3
 Chlamydophila pneumoniae1
 Staphylococcus aureus1
 Pneumocystis jirovecii1
 Mycobacterium tuberculosis2
Bronchitis34
 Haemophilus influenzae1
Upper respiratory infection205
 Streptococcus pyogenes8
 Group C streptococcus1
Influenza81
 Type A influenza60
 Type B influenza19
Sinusitis5
Bronchial asthma1
Atopic cough1
Table 7

Genitourinary diseases.

Urinary tract infection10
 Escherichia coli4
 Streptpcoccus agalactiae1
Prostatitis2
 E. coli1
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa1
Phallitis1
Pelvic inflammatory disease1
Genital herpes1
Epididymitis1
Genital warts1
Pyosalpinx1
 Streptococcus pyogenes1
Table 8

Hepatobiliary diseases.

Biliary infection2
Hepatitis15
 Hepatitis A virus7
 Hepatitis E virus2
 Hepatitis B virus1
 Epstein-Bar virus1
 Mefloquine-induced1
 Unknown3
Table 9

Neurological disease.

Aseptic meningitis8
 Coxsackievirus B51
Toxoplasma encephalitis1
Rabies1
Tension headache1
Migraine1
Drug-induced headache1
Table 10

Infrequent diseases.

Endocrine diseases
Adrenal dysfunction2
Hyperthyroidism2
Hypothyroidism1
Subacute thyroiditis1



Otological disease
Otitis media3



Bone/joint diseases
Bacterial spondylitis1
Reactive arthritis1



Eye diseases
Corneal ulcer1
Conjunctivitis1



Others
HIV infection2
Fatigue2
Dehydration1
Insomnia1
Vaccine adverse reaction1
Vertigo1
Table 11

Exposure region.

RegionNumberRatio %
Southeast Asia101442.7
South Asia37715.9
Africa25910.9
East Asia2259.5
Unspecified1064.5
Japan783.3
Europe773.2
North America743.1
Latin America692.9
Oceania652.7
None190.8
Middle East90.4
Airplane20.1
Organ-system syndrome by year. Gastrointestinal diseases. Skin/soft tissue diseases. Systemic febrile disease. Respiratory diseases. Genitourinary diseases. Hepatobiliary diseases. Neurological disease. Infrequent diseases. Exposure region.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest study of patients presenting at a Japanese travel clinic with a history of traveling abroad. A 12-year study of infectious diseases in travelers presenting to a Japanese clinic was published although this study was not comprehensive [2]. The majority of studies evaluating travel-associated diseases were conducted in the United States or Europe, with few reports of diseases specific to Japan or non-travel-associated diseases [4], [5], [6]. The present report provides a comprehensive and longitudinal study of diseases presenting at a Japanese clinic for patients with a history of overseas travel. Although the total number of patients visiting our clinic changed year by year, no correlation was observed between the number of patients leaving and coming to Japan over the years. The highest number of patients was seen in 2007, which may have been influenced by 2 deaths due to rabies in Japan in 2006. The lowest number of patients was seen in 2010, and this may be attributed to the H1N1 influenza pandemic in 2009. Many factors likely underlie the changes in the numbers of patients presenting to our clinic, with public awareness of disease pandemic likely being a major contributor. We included patients living in foreign countries, with their median duration of staying abroad influenced by this. The most frequently involved organ system was the gastrointestinal system over the entire study period, with the majority of cases diagnosed as enterocolitis. The ratio is much more than that of GeoSentinel's report (34%) [4]. The variety and frequency of causative agents identified in the present study were comparable to previous reports, except for strongyloides [4], [7], [8]. Regarding Vibrio cholerae serotype O1/non-O1 infections, no cases were observed after 2007. This finding may be attributable to infectious disease law revision in 2007, by which quarantine stations have not tested Vibrio cholera since then. With regard to parasites, giardia species and Entamoeba histolytica were the most common causative agents, with other helminths, such as, strongyloides, rarely identified. Cases of helminthic infection may be rare due to a relatively short duration of stay and low-risk behavior in foreign countries. Skin and soft tissue diseases are commonly associated with animal exposure. The large number of patients with animal exposure in the present study may be attributed to poor knowledge of the risk of animal bites among the Japanese population. The number of cases with animal exposure was the greatest in 2007 and declined thereafter. This number was likely considerably influenced by 2 cases of Japanese individuals who contracted rabies abroad and died in Japan in 2006. These 2 deaths increased awareness and education regarding rabies among the Japanese population; however, this awareness may have subsequently declined as no cases have since been observed in Japan. Therefore, when people were injured during contact with animals abroad, only a small fraction of them might have attended clinics. Among all sources of animal exposure, monkeys were the second most prominent. The high number of individuals injured by monkeys may be attributed to individuals being less wary of monkey attacks than of dog attacks, particularly in wildlife parks. These findings indicate Japanese travelers should be more cautious when dealing with animals likely to carry rabies. The underlying etiology in cases of systemic febrile disease was not determined in more than half of cases. For example, chikungunya fever outbreaks had been identified in countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, America, and the Indian and Pacific Oceans [9]; however, there were only 4 cases of chikungunya fever in the present study. We do not routinely test for chikungunya virus in patients with mild symptoms as diagnostic tests are unavailable in Japanese clinics. The major exposure region for malaria was Africa, with one case from East Asia (South Korea). It should be noted that South Korea, North Korea, and China, the nearest countries to Japan, had endemic malaria outbreaks in 2013 [10]. The number of malaria cases was the lowest in 2013, which is in agreement with the national surveillance data [11]; however, the reasons for this low number remain unclear. Upper respiratory infection was the most frequent respiratory diagnosis, followed by influenza. The H1N1 influenza pandemic occurred in 2009, and our clinic also experienced a large number of suspected cases. Although 23 of the 81 cases of influenza observed in the present study were diagnosed in 2009, influenza A/B was diagnosed in every year of the study period. As previous studies have reported year-round circulation of influenza viruses in tropical countries [12], influenza should be included as a differential diagnosis in all seasons in patients with a history of travel to tropical areas. The causative agent was confirmed in 16 of 23 cases of pneumonia. Four of these 16 cases were atypical pneumonia (M. pneumoniae in 3 cases and Chlamydophila pneumoniae), which has a longer incubation period and predominantly affects younger people compared to the typical pneumonia. Two cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, with longer incubation periods, were also observed. These results corroborate those of a previous report [4], [13]. Regarding diseases that are rarely observed in Japan, we experienced cases of rabies, melioidosis, murine typhus, and cutaneous leishmaniasis. No cases of Ebola virus disease, yellow fever, Zika virus infection, Middle East respiratory syndrome, plague, or anthrax were encountered; however, appropriate preparations should be in place for such lethal and/or highly infectious diseases. Vaccine-preventable diseases, excluding tuberculosis, were observed in 127 (5.3%) cases [14]. The proportion of patients receiving pre-travel consultation with vaccination/anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis was similar to a previous report [3] and was relatively low compared with that in foreign countries, where 20–40% of travelers undergo prophylaxis [4], [15], [16], [17]. Therefore, greater awareness among Japanese travelers is required regarding travel-associated diseases and the importance of prophylaxis. The limitations of the present study were the inclusion of patients from a single center and uncertainty regarding some diagnoses. First, single-center studies are subject to selection bias. Second, diagnostic laboratory techniques were limited at our facility, with viral culture, PCR, and many serological tests unavailable at our hospital, with these techniques only performed in highly suspected or severe cases. Third, the quality of diagnosis may have varied according to physicians' skill and experience. In conclusion, we report the findings of a longitudinal study of diagnoses in a real-world travel clinic setting in Japan. Gastrointestinal and skin and soft tissue diseases were the most common among patients with a history of overseas travel. Further, the incidence of diseases changed year by year and may have been influenced by specific disease outbreaks. As a low proportion of patients had received vaccination or pre-travel consultation before travel, Japanese travelers should be better informed regarding travel-related health risks.

Conflict of interest

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Global etiology of travelers' diarrhea: systematic review from 1973 to the present.

Authors:  Nipam Shah; Herbert L DuPont; David J Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 2.  Enteropathogens and chronic illness in returning travelers.

Authors:  Allen G P Ross; G Richard Olds; Allan W Cripps; Jeremy J Farrar; Donald P McManus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Spectrum of disease and relation to place of exposure among ill returned travelers.

Authors:  David O Freedman; Leisa H Weld; Phyllis E Kozarsky; Tamara Fisk; Rachel Robins; Frank von Sonnenburg; Jay S Keystone; Prativa Pandey; Martin S Cetron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Travel-associated infection presenting in Europe (2008-12): an analysis of EuroTravNet longitudinal, surveillance data, and evaluation of the effect of the pre-travel consultation.

Authors:  Patricia Schlagenhauf; Leisa Weld; Abraham Goorhuis; Philippe Gautret; Rainer Weber; Frank von Sonnenburg; Rogelio Lopez-Vélez; Mogens Jensenius; Jakob P Cramer; Vanessa K Field; Silvia Odolini; Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas; Francois Chappuis; Denis Malvy; Perry J J van Genderen; Frank Mockenhaupt; Stéphane Jauréguiberry; Catherine Smith; Nicholas J Beeching; Johan Ursing; Christophe Rapp; Philippe Parola; Martin P Grobusch
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Perception and knowledge about some infectious diseases among travelers from Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Sylvie Provost; Julio C Soto
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.490

6.  Post-Travel Consultations in a Regional Hub City Hospital, Japan.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yaita; Yoshiro Sakai; Jun Iwahashi; Kenji Masunaga; Nobuyuki Hamada; Hiroshi Watanabe
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.271

7.  Multicenter EuroTravNet/GeoSentinel study of travel-related infectious diseases in Europe.

Authors:  Philippe Gautret; Patricia Schlagenhauf; Jean Gaudart; Francesco Castelli; Philippe Brouqui; Frank von Sonnenburg; Louis Loutan; Philippe Parola
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Influenza seasonality and vaccination timing in tropical and subtropical areas of southern and south-eastern Asia.

Authors:  Siddhartha Saha; Mandeep Chadha; Abdullah Al Mamun; Mahmudur Rahman; Katharine Sturm-Ramirez; Malinee Chittaganpitch; Sirima Pattamadilok; Sonja J Olsen; Ondri Dwi Sampurno; Vivi Setiawaty; Krisna Nur Andriana Pangesti; Gina Samaan; Sibounhom Archkhawongs; Phengta Vongphrachanh; Darouny Phonekeo; Andrew Corwin; Sok Touch; Philippe Buchy; Nora Chea; Paul Kitsutani; Le Quynh Mai; Vu Dinh Thiem; Raymond Lin; Constance Low; Chong Chee Kheong; Norizah Ismail; Mohd Apandi Yusof; Amado Tandoc; Vito Roque; Akhilesh Mishra; Ann C Moen; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Jeffrey Partridge; Renu B Lal
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Pneumonia among travelers returning from abroad.

Authors:  Séverine Ansart; Olivier Pajot; Jean-Philippe Grivois; Valérie Zeller; Elise Klement; Lucia Perez; Philippe Bossi; François Bricaire; Eric Caumes
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.490

10.  GeoSentinel surveillance of illness in returned travelers, 2007-2011.

Authors:  Karin Leder; Joseph Torresi; Michael D Libman; Jakob P Cramer; Francesco Castelli; Patricia Schlagenhauf; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Mary E Wilson; Jay S Keystone; Eli Schwartz; Elizabeth D Barnett; Frank von Sonnenburg; John S Brownstein; Allen C Cheng; Mark J Sotir; Douglas H Esposito; David O Freedman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.