| Literature DB >> 27779963 |
Bradley Genovese1, Steven Yin, Sohail Sareh, Michael DeVirgilio, Laith Mukdad, Jessica Davis, Veronica J Santos, Peyman Benharash.
Abstract
With changes in work hour limitations, there is an increasing need for objective determination of technical proficiency. Electromagnetic hand-motion analysis has previously shown only time to completion and number of movements to correlation with expertise. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of hand-motion-tracking analysis in determining surgical skill proficiency. A nine-degree-of-freedom sensor was used and mounted on the superior aspect of a needle driver. A one-way analysis of variance and Welch's t test were performed to evaluate significance between subjects. Four Novices, four Trainees, and three Experts performed a large vessel patch anastomosis on a phantom tissue. Path length, total number of movements, absolute velocity, and total time were analyzed between groups. Compared to the Novices, Expert subjects exhibited significantly decreased total number of movements, decreased instrument path length, and decreased total time to complete tasks. There were no significant differences found in absolute velocity between groups. In this pilot study, we have identified significant differences in patterns of motion between Novice and Expert subjects. These data warrant further analysis for its predictive value in larger cohorts at different levels of training and may be a useful tool in competence-based training paradigms in the future.Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27779963 DOI: 10.1177/000313481608201002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Surg ISSN: 0003-1348 Impact factor: 0.688