Lisa J Neilson1, Lesley A Macaskill1, Jonathan M H Luk1, Navreeti Sharma1, Steve M Killip2, Marina I Salvadori3, Jamie A Seabrook1,3,4,5, Paula D N Dworatzek1,6. 1. a Division of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College at Western University, London, ON. 2. b Thames Valley District School Board, London, ON. 3. c Department of Paediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON. 4. d Children's Health Research Institute, London, ON. 5. e Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON. 6. f Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the type and quantity of foods children brought and consumed at school in the balanced school day (BSD), with two 20-minute eating periods, versus the traditional schedule (TS), with one 20-minute lunch. METHODS: Direct observation identified food items and amounts in BSD and TS lunches of grade 3 and 4 students (n = 321). RESULTS: The mean (SD) servings of foods packed in BSD lunches were significantly higher than the TS lunches for milk and alternatives (0.69 (0.70) vs 0.47 (0.49), P = 0.02), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs; 0.91 (1.24) vs 0.57 (0.99), P = 0.01), and snacks (2.74 (1.55) vs 2.24 (1.48), P < 0.01). Regardless of schedule, only 40.8% of students had vegetables packed in their lunch, whereas 92.8% had snacks. When comparing foods eaten, SSBs and snacks remained significantly higher in the BSD (0.75 (1.02) vs 0.48 (0.83), P = 0.03; 2.37 (1.44) vs 1.93 (1.36), P = 0.01, respectively). The proportion of children (%) whose consumption met one-third of Canada's Food Guide recommendations for vegetables and fruit was low (27.5% BSD, 31.0% TS). CONCLUSIONS: The BSD may have unintended negative consequences on the type and amount of foods packed in school lunches. Support for families should focus on encouraging more vegetables and fruit and fewer SSBs and snacks in packed lunches.
PURPOSE: To assess the type and quantity of foods children brought and consumed at school in the balanced school day (BSD), with two 20-minute eating periods, versus the traditional schedule (TS), with one 20-minute lunch. METHODS: Direct observation identified food items and amounts in BSD and TS lunches of grade 3 and 4 students (n = 321). RESULTS: The mean (SD) servings of foods packed in BSD lunches were significantly higher than the TS lunches for milk and alternatives (0.69 (0.70) vs 0.47 (0.49), P = 0.02), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs; 0.91 (1.24) vs 0.57 (0.99), P = 0.01), and snacks (2.74 (1.55) vs 2.24 (1.48), P < 0.01). Regardless of schedule, only 40.8% of students had vegetables packed in their lunch, whereas 92.8% had snacks. When comparing foods eaten, SSBs and snacks remained significantly higher in the BSD (0.75 (1.02) vs 0.48 (0.83), P = 0.03; 2.37 (1.44) vs 1.93 (1.36), P = 0.01, respectively). The proportion of children (%) whose consumption met one-third of Canada's Food Guide recommendations for vegetables and fruit was low (27.5% BSD, 31.0% TS). CONCLUSIONS: The BSD may have unintended negative consequences on the type and amount of foods packed in school lunches. Support for families should focus on encouraging more vegetables and fruit and fewer SSBs and snacks in packed lunches.
Authors: Lisa J Neilson; Lesley A Macaskill; Jonathan M H Luk; Navreeti Sharma; Marina I Salvadori; Jamie A Seabrook; Paula D N Dworatzek Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-05-08 Impact factor: 6.706