Literature DB >> 27779781

EPA-Registered Repellents for Mosquitoes Transmitting Emerging Viral Disease.

Radha V Patel1,2, Kristy M Shaeer1,2, Pooja Patel1,3, Aleksey Garmaza1, Kornwalee Wiangkham1, Rachel B Franks1,2, Olivia Pane1,3, Nicholas W Carris1,3.   

Abstract

In many parts of the United States, mosquitoes were previously nuisance pests. However, they now represent a potential threat in the spread of viral diseases. The Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex species mosquitoes are endemic to the United States and together may transmit a variety of viral diseases of growing concern, including West Nile virus, chikungunya, dengue fever, and Zika virus. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommend N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) as a first-line mosquito repellent, but for patients refusing to use DEET or other conventional repellents, guidance is limited to any EPA-registered product. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify which EPA-registered personal mosquito repellent provides the best protection from A. aegypti, A. albopictus, and Culex spp. mosquitoes. We abstracted data from 62 published reports of EPA-registered mosquito repellents. The conventional repellent picaridin has the strongest data to support its use as a second-line agent, while IR3535 and oil of lemon eucalyptus are reasonably effective natural products. Citronella, catnip, and 2-undecanone offer limited protection or have limited data. These results can be used by pharmacists and other health care professionals to advise patients on the selection of an EPA-registered mosquito repellent. Regardless of the repellent chosen, it is vital for patients to follow all instructions/precautions in the product labeling to ensure safe and effective use.
© 2016 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Aedes aegyptizzm321990; zzm321990Aedes albopictuszzm321990; Culex species; West Nile virus; Zika; chikungunya; dengue; mosquito; repellent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27779781     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Infections and Pertinent Infections Related to Travel for Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Kathleen E Sullivan; Hamid Bassiri; Ahmed A Bousfiha; Beatriz T Costa-Carvalho; Alexandra F Freeman; David Hagin; Yu L Lau; Michail S Lionakis; Ileana Moreira; Jorge A Pinto; M Isabel de Moraes-Pinto; Amit Rawat; Shereen M Reda; Saul Oswaldo Lugo Reyes; Mikko Seppänen; Mimi L K Tang
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 8.317

2.  Does Zika virus infection affect mosquito response to repellents?

Authors:  Walter S Leal; Rosângela M R Barbosa; Fangfang Zeng; Gabriel B Faierstein; Kaiming Tan; Marcelo H S Paiva; Duschinka R D Guedes; Mônica M Crespo; Constância F J Ayres
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Methyl dihydrojasmonate and lilial are the constituents with an "off-label" insect repellence in perfumes.

Authors:  Fangfang Zeng; Pingxi Xu; Kaiming Tan; Paulo H G Zarbin; Walter S Leal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Human-Mosquito Contact: A Missing Link in Our Understanding of Mosquito-Borne Disease Transmission Dynamics.

Authors:  Panpim Thongsripong; James M Hyman; Durrell D Kapan; Shannon N Bennett
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Support for the Transmission-Clearance Trade-Off Hypothesis from a Study of Zika Virus Delivered by Mosquito Bite to Mice.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hanley; Sasha R Azar; Rafael K Campos; Nikos Vasilakis; Shannan L Rossi
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.