Literature DB >> 27779761

Molecular recognition at cholinergic synapses: acetylcholine versus choline.

Iva Bruhova1, Anthony Auerbach1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Neuromuscular acetylcholine (ACh) receptors have a high affinity for the neurotransmitter ACh and a low affinity for its metabolic product choline. At each transmitter binding site three aromatic groups determine affinity, and together provide ∼50% more binding energy for ACh than for choline. Deprotonation of αY190 by a nearby lysine strengthens the interaction between this aromatic ring and both ACh and choline. H-bonds position ACh and choline differently in the aromatic cage to generate the different affinities. ABSTRACT: Acetylcholine (ACh) released at the vertebrate nerve-muscle synapse is hydrolysed rapidly to choline (Cho), so endplate receptors (AChRs) are exposed to high concentrations of both of these structurally related ligands. To understand how these receptors distinguish ACh and Cho, we used single-channel electrophysiology to measure resting affinities (binding free energies) of these and other agonists in adult-type mouse AChRs having a mutation(s) at the transmitter-binding sites. The aromatic rings of αY190, αW149 and αY198 each provide ∼50% less binding energy for Cho compared to ACh. At αY198 a phenylalanine substitution had no effect, but at αY190 this substitution caused a large, agonist-independent loss in binding energy that depended on the presence of αK145. The results suggest that (1) αY190 is deprotonated by αK145 to strengthen the interaction between this benzene ring and the agonist's quaternary ammonium (QA) and (2) AChRs respond strongly to ACh because an H-bond positions the QA to interact optimally with the rings, and weakly to Cho because a different H-bond tethers the ligand to misalign the QA and form weaker interactions with the aromatic groups. The results suggest that the difference in ACh versus Cho binding energies is determined by different ligand positions within a fixed protein structure.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agonist; cation-pi; ion channel; neuromuscular; receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27779761      PMCID: PMC5309369          DOI: 10.1113/JP273291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  41 in total

1.  Design and control of acetylcholine receptor conformational change.

Authors:  Snehal V Jadey; Prasad Purohit; Iva Bruhova; Timothy M Gregg; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating binding affinities of the nicotinic receptor for low-efficacy ligands using mixtures of agonists and two-dimensional concentration-response relationships.

Authors:  Yamini Purohit; Claudio Grosman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Dose-response relations for unnatural amino acids at the agonist binding site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: tests with novel side chains and with several agonists.

Authors:  P C Kearney; M W Nowak; W Zhong; S K Silverman; H A Lester; D A Dougherty
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Energetics of gating at the apo-acetylcholine receptor transmitter binding site.

Authors:  Prasad Purohit; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Energy for wild-type acetylcholine receptor channel gating from different choline derivatives.

Authors:  Iva Bruhova; Timothy Gregg; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Loop C and the mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-channel gating.

Authors:  Prasad Purohit; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  From ab initio quantum mechanics to molecular neurobiology: a cation-pi binding site in the nicotinic receptor.

Authors:  W Zhong; J P Gallivan; Y Zhang; L Li; H A Lester; D A Dougherty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  An integrated catch-and-hold mechanism activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Snehal Jadey; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Nicotine binding to brain receptors requires a strong cation-pi interaction.

Authors:  Xinan Xiu; Nyssa L Puskar; Jai A P Shanata; Henry A Lester; Dennis A Dougherty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Molecular dynamics studies of AChBP with nicotine and carbamylcholine: the role of water in the binding pocket.

Authors:  Shiva Amiri; Mark S P Sansom; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 1.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Choline and acetylcholine: what a difference an acetate makes!

Authors:  Alasdair J Gibb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cyclic activation of endplate acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Tapan K Nayak; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Agonist efficiency from concentration-response curves: Structural implications and applications.

Authors:  Dinesh C Indurthi; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A single molecular distance predicts agonist binding energy in nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  Sushree Tripathy; Wenjun Zheng; Anthony Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.086

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.