Literature DB >> 27779605

Does Lordotic Angle of Cage Determine Lumbar Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Taek-Ho Hong1, Kyu-Jung Cho, Young-Tae Kim, Jae-Woo Park, Beom-Ho Seo, Nak-Chul Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective, radiological analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine that 15° lordotic angle cages create higher lumbar lordosis in open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) than 4° and 8° cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Restoration of lumbar lordosis is important to obtain good outcome after lumbar fusion surgery. Various shapes and angles of cages in interbody fusion have been used; however, it is not proved that lordotic angle of cages determine lumbar lordosis.
METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were evaluated after TLIF using 15° cages and screw instrumentation. For comparison, TLIF using 4° lordotic angle cages in 65 patients and 8° cages in 49 patients were analyzed. Lumbar lordosis angles, segmental lordosis angles, disc height, and bony union rate were measured on the radiographs.
RESULTS: The lumbar lordosis was 31.1° preoperatively, improved to 42.9° postoperatively, and decreased to 36.4° at the last follow-up in the 15° group. It was 35.8° before surgery, corrected to 41.5° after surgery, and changed to 33.6° at the last follow-up in the 4° group. In the 8° group, it was 32.7° preoperatively, improved to 39.1° postoperatively, and decreased to 34.5° at the last follow-up. These changes showed statistical significances (P < 0.001). The segmental lordosis at L4-5 was 6.6° before surgery, 13.1° after surgery, and 9.8° at the last follow-up in the 15° group. It was 6.9°, 9.5°, and 6.2° in the 4° group and 6.7°, 9.8°, and 8.1° in the 8° group, respectively (P < 0.001). The disc height restoration was better in the 15° group than in the 4° and 8° groups (P < 0.001). Bony union rate was not significant among the three groups (P = 0.087).
CONCLUSION: The lordotic angle of the cages determined restoration of lumbar lordosis after TLIF. Cages with sufficient lordotic angle showed better restoration of lumbar lordosis and prevention of loss of correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27779605     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Correction of kyphotic fixed lumbar segments and hypolordosis with the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; E Stettin; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Comparing hyperlordotic and standard lordotic cages for achieving segmental lumbar lordosis during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Justin Mathew; Meghan Cerpa; Nathan J Lee; Venkat Boddapati; Gerard Marciano; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

3.  What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Soo-Heon Kim; Bang Sang Hahn; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.052

4.  Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5.

Authors:  Myeong Jin Ko; Seung Won Park; Young Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-05-08

5.  Impact of lordotic cages in the restoration of spinopelvic parameters after dorsal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case control study.

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Vincent Heck; Sonja Bantle; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Christoph Hofstetter; Stefan Budde; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Do Radiographic Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Vary with Cage Position in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Diseases?

Authors:  Qing Ding; Xiangyu Tang; Ruizhuo Zhang; Hua Wu; Chaoxu Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Analysis of Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at Lumbosacral Spine.

Authors:  Shengtao Dong; Jie Li; Xiaomeng Jia; Jieyang Zhu; Yaoning Chen; Bo Yuan
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-21

8.  Global Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after 1-3 Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion in Degenerative Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Yung-Hun Youn; Kyu-Jung Cho; Yeop Na; Jeong-Seok Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-09-28

9.  Factors Affecting Incomplete L5/S Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Including Spinopelvic Sagittal Parameters.

Authors:  Shinichi Kato; Nobuki Terada; Osamu Niwa; Mitsuko Yamada
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-09-03

10.  Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Ke Gong; Yang Lin; Zhibin Wang; Feng Li; Wei Xiong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.