Literature DB >> 27779160

Relationship between Inflammatory Response and Estimated Complication Rate after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Xu-Xu Chen1, Tao Wang1, Jian Li1, Hui Kang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is a noteworthy inflammatory response. The inflammatory response is associated with postoperative recovery and complications. However, there had been few reports on the relationship between inflammatory response and postoperative complication rate. The aim of the present study was to investigate early inflammatory response in the first 3 days after THA, and to identify the relationship between inflammatory response and estimated complication rate after surgery.
METHODS: It was a prospective, nonrandomized cohort study. There were 148 patients who underwent unilateral THA in our hospital enrolled. Blood samples were collected preoperatively in the morning of the surgery and at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in peripheral blood were measured. The modified physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity (POSSUM) was recorded pre- and intra-operatively. Based on the score, estimated complication rate was calculated. Harris score was used to assess hip function before and after surgery.
RESULTS: IL-6 levels reached the peak at 24 h after surgery and CRP at 48 h. After that, both of the levels decreased. The mean Harris scores significantly increased from 41.62 ± 23.47 before surgery to 72.75 ± 9.13 at 3 days after surgery. The Harris scores after surgery did not have a significant relation with either IL-6 or CRP peak levels (P = 0.165, P = 0.341, respectively). Both CRP and IL-6 peak levels significantly and positively correlated with estimated complication rate after surgery. The estimated complication rate calculated using the POSSUM system was 43 cases of 148 patients. Actually, there were only 28 cases that were observed to get postoperative complications during hospitalization. However, there was no significant difference between estimated and observed complication rates (P = 0.078). In the group with complications, the CRP and IL-6 peak levels were significantly higher than those in the group without complications (both P< 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There were significantly positive relationships between both peak levels of CRP and IL-6 and estimated complication rate after THA. Inflammatory response could predict the incidence of complications after THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27779160      PMCID: PMC5125332          DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.192772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly used to recover joint structure and function. As a kind of surgical intervention and a form of programmed trauma, it can cause a variety of physiological changes, including increased stress hormones, various humoral mediators, and acute-phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein (CRP).[1] Especially, the pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6),[23] tumor necrosis factor-α,[4] and IL-1β,[5] are considered important mediators of the pathological changes associated with surgery. They play an important role in controlling the immune system in inflammatory response. In many studies, IL-6 has been recognized as a major mediator of the acute-phase protein response and a marker of postoperative tissue trauma.[12] THA is associated with a noteworthy inflammatory response. As reported by Larsson et al.,[6] this response might last more than 6 weeks after surgery. Some researchers suggested that the inflammatory response might determine postoperative recovery and complications.[78] However, to our knowledge, there have been few reports on the relationship between inflammatory response and postoperative complication rate. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the early inflammatory response in the first few days after THA and to identify the relationship between inflammatory response and complication rate. Just like what had been done in previous studies, IL-6 and CRP were adopted as the markers of the inflammatory response because they elevated markedly and were easy to be detected in systemic circulation even after mild inflammation.[2]

Methods

Subjects

The investigation was designed as a prospective, nonrandomized cohort study, with the approval of the clinical research committee of our hospital. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients needing THA; no history of THA; be able to tolerate anesthetics and surgery; no taking nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs or immunosuppressive drug within 4 weeks before surgery; no history of tumor; and no previous surgery in 3 months before surgery. On admission, all patients that met inclusion criteria were informed about the clinical study. They decided to be enrolled or not and signed the consent forms. Finally, 148 patients scheduled for unilateral THA were enrolled from August 2009 to March 2013. All patients underwent the unilateral THA. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon through the posterolateral approach to reduce the difference in surgical trauma. Each case received epidural anesthesia and a patient controlled epidural analgesia pump at the end of the operation.

Clinical assessment

Harris score was used to assess hip function before surgery and at 3 days after surgery. The Numeric Rating Scale was used to help patients communicate how much pain they were experiencing at moving the operated limb. The measuring was conducted at the admission and at 3 days postoperatively. On the basis of scores, there were four grades: none (0), mild (1–3), moderate (4–6), and severe (7–10). Data, including age, gender, weight, and height, were collected upon admission. The surgery duration and the total blood loss and transfusion were also recorded. The incision length was measured with an aseptic paper ruler after suture.

Measurement of serum CRP and IL-6 levels

Blood samples were obtained preoperatively in the morning of the surgery and at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperatively. The CRP concentrations were determined using the latex particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay on the BN ProSpec analyzer (Dade Behring, Germany) and were expressed in mg/L. IL-6 was measured in serum samples by a sandwich quantitative enzyme immunoassay technique (R&D Systems, Camarillo, CA, USA). The assay had a sensitivity of 2–500 pg/ml for IL-6.

Calculation of estimated complication rates

The modified physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity (POSSUM) was recorded pre- and intra-operatively[9] [Tables 1 and 2]. Based on the score, estimated complication rate was calculated according to the morbidity formula depicted by Mohamed et al.[9] The morbidity (R) formula is as follows.
Table 1

The physiological assessment in the orthopedic POSSUM system

ItemsPhysiological score

1248
Age (years)<6060–70>70-
Cardiac signsNormalOn cardiac drugs or steroidEdema, warfarin, borderline cardiomegalyRaised JVP Cardiomegaly
Respiration signsNormalSOB exertionSOB stairsSOB rest
Chest radiographNormalMild COADModel COADAny other chang (Fibrosis or consolidation)
Systolic BP (mmHg)110–130130–170≥171≤89
100–10990–99
Pulse (beats/min)50–8081–100100–120≥121
40–49≤39
Coma score1512–149–11≤8
Blood urea (mmol/L)≤7.57.6–10.010.1–15.0≥15.1
Blood Na (mmol/L)≥136131–135126–130≥125
Blood K (mmol/L)3.5–5.03.2–3.42.9–3.1≥2.8
5.1–5.35.4–5.9≥6
Hb (g/dl)13–1611.5–12.910.0–11.4≤9.9
16.1–17.017.1–18.0≥18.1
White cell count (×1012/L)4–1010.1–20.0≥20.1-
3.1–3.9≤3
ECGNormalAtrial fibrillation (rate 60–90)Any other abnormal rhythm or ≥5 ectopics/min Q waves or ST/T wave changes

1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa. POSSUM: Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity; BP: Blood pressure; Hb: Hemoglobin; ECG: Electrocardiograph; JVP: Jugular venous pressure; SOB: Shortness of breath; COAD: Chronic obstructive airway disease. - : Not applicable.

Table 2

The operative severity assessment in the orthopedic POSSUM system

ItemsOperative severity score

1248
MagnitudeFasciotomy, ganglion/bursa, tenotomy/tendon repair, arthroscopic surgery, carpal tunnel/nerve release, removal of metal, closed reduction of fractureExcision/osteotomy small bone, minor joint replacement, amputation digit/digits, closed reduction with external fixation, open reduction of fracture of small boneOsteotomy long bone, Ligamentous reconstruction + prosthesis, arthrodesis large joint, major joint replacement, amputation limb, disc surgery, open reduction of fracture of a long boneRadical tumorectomy, major spinal reconstruction, revision prosthetic replacement, major joint, hindquarter/forequarter amputation
Number of operative variables within 30 days1-2>2
Blood loss (ml)≤100101–500501–999≥1000
ContaminationNoneIncised woundMinor contamination or necrosis tissueGross contamination or necrosis tissue
Presence of malignancyNonePrimary lesionNode metastasesDistant metastases
Timing of operationElective-Emergency, resuscitation possible ≤48 hEmergency, immediate ≤6 h

-: Not applicable; POSSUM: Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity.

The physiological assessment in the orthopedic POSSUM system 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa. POSSUM: Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity; BP: Blood pressure; Hb: Hemoglobin; ECG: Electrocardiograph; JVP: Jugular venous pressure; SOB: Shortness of breath; COAD: Chronic obstructive airway disease. - : Not applicable. The operative severity assessment in the orthopedic POSSUM system -: Not applicable; POSSUM: Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of the morbidity. ln R/(1 − R) = −5.91 + (0.16 × physiological score) + (0.19 × operative severity score).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 15.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as a percentage of patients. The changes of variables before and after surgery were compared using analysis of variance or t-tests. Correlation analysis was used to analyze relationships between variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Totally, 148 patients enrolled and no one dropped out during hospitalization. The average time of hospital stay after surgery was 6.7 days. There were nine cases (6.08%) of intracapsular femoral neck fracture, 17 cases (11.49%) of intertrochanteric fracture, 11 cases (7.43%) of old femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture, 72 cases (48.65%) of femoral head necrosis, 18 cases (12.16%) of hip dysplasia, 15 cases (10.14%) of hip osteoarthritis, three cases (2.03%) of hip rheumatoid arthritis, and three cases (2.03%) of ankylosing spondylitis. Before surgery, both CRP and IL-6 levels in patients of intracapsular neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture were significantly higher than other group patients [Figure 1]. Table 3 summarizes the main population characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgery duration, incision length, blood loss, and transfusion. Neither of these background variables had a significant correlation with CRP nor IL-6 peak levels after surgery.
Figure 1

Preoperative serum CRP and IL-6 levels for different diseases. Both CRP and IL-6 levels in NF and IF groups are significantly higher than those in OF, HN, HD, and Ar groups (all P < 0.05). CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6; NF: Intracapsular femoral neck fracture; IF: Intertrochanteric fracture; OF: Old fracture; HN: Femoral head necrosis; HD: Hip dysplasia; Ar: Arthritis including hip osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

Table 3

Demographic characteristics, operative parameters, and their correlations with CRP and IL-6 levels (n = 148)

ParametersValuesCRPIL-6


rPrP
Age (years)61.62 ± 15.350.1400.640.1650.85
Male*84 (56.76%)−0.1680.94−0.2730.82
BMI (kg/m2)25.31 ± 3.720.0770.460.1320.13
Surgery duration (min)91.66 ± 15.130.2000.900.3140.90
Incision length (cm)12.26 ± 2.390.0660940.0890.73
Blood loss (ml)612.34 ± 220.640.1930.760.1990.94
Blood transfusion (IU)2.17 ± 1.390.0970.840.1120.97

All data are shown as mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. *Spearman correlation coefficient test was used in correlation analysis. The others used Pearson correlation coefficient test. CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6; BMI: Body mass index; SD: Standard deviation.

Preoperative serum CRP and IL-6 levels for different diseases. Both CRP and IL-6 levels in NF and IF groups are significantly higher than those in OF, HN, HD, and Ar groups (all P < 0.05). CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6; NF: Intracapsular femoral neck fracture; IF: Intertrochanteric fracture; OF: Old fracture; HN: Femoral head necrosis; HD: Hip dysplasia; Ar: Arthritis including hip osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Demographic characteristics, operative parameters, and their correlations with CRP and IL-6 levels (n = 148) All data are shown as mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. *Spearman correlation coefficient test was used in correlation analysis. The others used Pearson correlation coefficient test. CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6; BMI: Body mass index; SD: Standard deviation. Before surgery, both IL-6 and CRP levels were lower. After surgery, both IL-6 and CRP levels rose immediately and reached the peak at 24 and 48 h, respectively. After that, both levels decreased. Both IL-6 and CRP levels at each time point after surgery were significantly higher than that before surgery (all P < 0.05) [Figure 2].
Figure 2

Pre- and post-operative serum CRP and IL-6 levels. CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6.

Pre- and post-operative serum CRP and IL-6 levels. CRP: C-reaction protein; IL-6: Interleukin-6. The mean Harris score was 41.62 ± 23.47 before surgery and 72.75 ± 9.13 at 3 days after surgery. There was a significant increase of Harris scores after surgery (P < 0.001). The mean pain scores decreased significantly after surgery (5.46 ± 1.61), compared with that before surgery (6.90 ± 3.11, P = 0.012). The Harris scores after surgery did not have a significant relation with either IL-6 or CRP peak levels (P = 0.165, P = 0.341, respectively). The average physiological score was 18.79 ± 4.93. The average operative severity score was 14.01 ± 2.86. The estimated complication rate was 43 cases of 148 patients. Actually, there were only 28 cases who were observed to get postoperative complications during hospitalization, including eight cases of pulmonary infection, five cases of wound infection, and 17 cases of digestive system diseases (five cases of diarrhea, five cases of abdominal distention, and seven cases of constipation). There were 2 cases with both pulmonary infection and digestive system diseases. Moreover, there was one case that got prosthesis-related infection and underwent debridement and two-stage revision surgery. There was no significant difference between estimated and observed complication rates (P = 0.078). In the group with complications, the CRP and IL-6 peak levels were significantly higher than those in the group without complications (both P < 0.001) [Figure 3]. The estimated complication rates for patients of intracapsular neck and intertrochanteric fracture were consistent with observed rates. As for patients of other diseases, the estimated rates were higher than the observed rates [Table 4].
Figure 3

Comparisons of CRP and IL-6 peak levels after surgery between the group with complications and the group without complications. In the group with complications, the IL-6 (*) and CRP (†) peak levels were significantly higher than those in the group without complications (both P < 0.001). IL-6: Interleukin-6; CRP: C-reaction protein.

Table 4

Physiological and operative severity scores, estimated and observed complication rates for different diseases (n = 148)

DiseasesPhysiological scoreOperative severity scoreComplication rates

EstimatedObserved
Intracapsular neck fracture19.01 ± 4.9014.88 ± 3.0144
Intertrochanteric fracture19.90 ± 4.9614.60 ± 2.8478
Old fracture18.92 ± 4.2813.69 ± 2.6732
Head necrosis18.71 ± 4.9614.00 ± 2.971610
Hip dysplasia16.94 ± 3.5113.03 ± 2.1462
Arthritis17.95 ± 4.0413.67 ± 2.8872

All data are shown as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. SD: Standard deviation.

Comparisons of CRP and IL-6 peak levels after surgery between the group with complications and the group without complications. In the group with complications, the IL-6 (*) and CRP (†) peak levels were significantly higher than those in the group without complications (both P < 0.001). IL-6: Interleukin-6; CRP: C-reaction protein. Physiological and operative severity scores, estimated and observed complication rates for different diseases (n = 148) All data are shown as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. SD: Standard deviation. The scatter diagrams of the correlations between both IL-6 and CRP peak levels and estimated complication rates showed linear trends [Figure 4]. The Pearson correlation analysis resulted that there was a significant positive relationship between IL-6 peak levels and estimated complication rates (r = 0.558, P < 0.001). A similar relationship could also be observed between CRP peak levels and estimated complication rates (r = 0.577, P < 0.001). After multivariate linear regression analysis, the IL-6 variable was rejected out and a regression equation could be got as follows: Estimated complication rate = −4.037 + 0.064 × CRP (mg/L) (P < 0.001).
Figure 4

The scatter diagrams of the correlations between both IL-6 (a) and CRP (b) peak levels and estimated complication rates (n = 148). IL-6: Interleukin-6; CRP: C-reaction protein.

The scatter diagrams of the correlations between both IL-6 (a) and CRP (b) peak levels and estimated complication rates (n = 148). IL-6: Interleukin-6; CRP: C-reaction protein.

Discussion

In the present study, we estimated all patients’ complication rates by the POSSUM scores before surgery and investigated the early inflammatory response in the first 3 days after THA. Results showed that there was a significantly positive relationship between the level of inflammatory response and estimated complication rate. There was no significant difference between estimated and observed complication rates. The CRP and IL-6 peak levels in the group with complications were significantly higher than those in the group without complications. After THA, previous reports describe that circulating concentration of IL-6 significantly increases, which concurs with our findings. Moreover, IL-6 can regulate the generation of the acute-phase response, including CRP. Consistent with the present study, many studies show that the increase in IL-6 is followed by a rise in CRP in patients who undergo THA. Moreover, there is usually a significant relationship between both markers.[2] Besides, the releases of IL-6 and CRP correlate with the severity of tissue trauma. Therefore, in many studies, IL-6 or CRP is detected as the marker of surgery magnitude.[10] Many previous studies have been performed to evaluate the postoperative inflammatory response, adopting IL-6 and CRP as the markers.[11] Hall et al.[11] studied the relationship between hip functional recovery and inflammatory response after hip arthroplasty and suggested that the inflammatory response was correlative with postoperative pain and early functional recovery. In the study of Feng et al.,[12] patients undergoing elective total knee replacement were investigated and it was found that peripheral IL-6 level significantly correlated with pain score at 48 h after surgery. Besides, Ugras et al.[13] found that early functional recovery after total knee replacement was affected by the local inflammatory response. However, in this study, the early functional recovery did not significantly correlate with either IL-6 or CRP levels. This might be because our study has a small sample and the functional scores at 3 days after surgery are too early to be distinguished. Furthermore, many researchers have observed that IL-6 and CRP are useful risk factors and indicators of infectious complications. Scherer et al.[14] studied 330 patients who had operative fracture treatment and suggested that a cutoff CRP level of 140 mg/L on the 4th day after surgery was recorded for patients with deep wound infection. This evidence suggested that inflammatory response more or less gave a prediction for the incidence of complications. However, these results did not clearly prove the relationship between inflammatory response and the morbidity of complications after THA. In this study, we correlated the level of inflammatory response with estimated complication rate by POSSUM and found there was a significantly positive relationship between them, which was in accordance with previous results. Moreover, the CRP and IL-6 peak levels in the group with complications were significantly higher than those in the group without complications, which additionally noted the predictive role of inflammatory response. The POSSUM system was first depicted by Copeland as a measurable method of assessing outcomes of surgical intervention based on symptoms and signs, physiological parameters, and operative severity parameters.[15] Mohamed et al.[9] modified the score system and made it applicable in orthopedic surgeries. They applied the modified POSSUM in a study of 2336 cases who underwent orthopedic surgeries and found that the estimated morbidity and mortality were nearly the same with the observed rates.[9] In our study, we calculated the estimated complication rate by POSSUM and analyzed its correlation with the level of inflammatory response. Our results showed that the estimated complication rates were consistent with the observed rates, indicating the applicability of the modified POSSUM in orthopedic surgeries. Some previous studies observed that the levels of CRP and IL-6 were relative with age,[16] gender,[17] BMI,[18] the total blood loss[1920] or transfusion,[21] or postoperative pain.[12] However, in this study, there were no significant relationships between these background variables and CRP or IL-6 levels. This might be because the relationship is so weak that it is not significant in a small-sample study. Several other limitations of the study should also be acknowledged. First, the main limitation of the present study is a small size and heterogeneous character of patient population. There are some confounding factors that might have an influence on levels of CRP and IL-6 after surgery. However, the inclusion criteria are so strict that the investigation is too time consuming to find a lager enough patient population. Second, it would be better if the drained fluid samples were collected to detect local inflammatory factors. As reported in a previous study,[2223] there was a 1000-fold increase of IL-6 levels in drained fluid, comparing to the systemic concentrations in arterial blood of patients operated in thoracic scoliosis. Furthermore, what period of complications after surgery the CRP and IL-6 levels could predict is still unclear. The answer cannot be gotten in this study, either. More attention should be given on this problem in further studies. In conclusion, we concluded that the early inflammatory response significantly correlated with the estimated complication rate and it could give predictions for complications after THA.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Neuroendocrine and inflammatory aspects of surgery: do they affect outcome?

Authors:  B C Kennedy; G M Hall
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1999

2.  An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  K Mohamed; G P Copeland; D A Boot; H C Casserley; I M Shackleford; P G Sherry; G J Stewart
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07

Review 3.  Inflammatory mediators in the elderly.

Authors:  Karen Suárez Krabbe; Maria Pedersen; Helle Bruunsgaard
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.032

4.  Sex differences in glucocorticoid sensitivity of proinflammatory cytokine production after psychosocial stress.

Authors:  N Rohleder; N C Schommer; D H Hellhammer; R Engel; C Kirschbaum
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Characterizing the Acute Phase Response in Healthy Patients Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: Predictable and Consistent.

Authors:  William K Oelsner; Stephen M Engstrom; Michael A Benvenuti; Thomas J An; Richard A Jacobson; Gregory G Polkowski; Jonathan G Schoenecker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Which is more important after total knee arthroplasty: Local inflammatory response or systemic inflammatory response?

Authors:  Ali Akın Ugraş; Cemal Kural; Alev Kural; Fatma Demirez; Macit Koldaş; Ercan Cetinus
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The effect of unmodified or prestorage white cell-reduced allogeneic red cell transfusions on the immune responsiveness in orthopedic surgery patients.

Authors:  J O Bordin; A K Chiba; K I Carvalho; E T Takata; R P Falcão; A B Garcia; I A Bordin; M M Maciel; S Andreoni; J Kerbauy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Elevation of circulating interleukin 6 after surgery: factors influencing the serum level.

Authors:  K Sakamoto; H Arakawa; S Mita; T Ishiko; S Ikei; H Egami; S Hisano; M Ogawa
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.861

9.  C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  S Larsson; U Thelander; S Friberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Predictors of perioperative blood loss in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jai Hyung Park; Mohammad R Rasouli; S M Javad Mortazavi; Anthony T Tokarski; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patients Who Undergo Early Aseptic Revision TKA Within 90 Days of Surgery Have a High Risk of Re-revision and Infection at 2 Years: A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Alex Gu; Patawut Bovonratwet; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Peter K Sculco; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Anesthetic Effect of the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with Different Approaches on Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammation.

Authors:  Tengchen Feng; Jibo Zhao; Jiayi Wang; Xiaojia Sun; Tong Jia; Fulong Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Precision multiparameter tracking of inflammation on timescales of hours to years using serial dried blood spots.

Authors:  Leigh Anderson; Morteza Razavi; Matthew E Pope; Richard Yip; L C Cameron; Adriana Bassini-Cameron; Terry W Pearson
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Zaiyang Liu; Jun Zhang; Kaiqi He; Yumei Zhang; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2019-08-08

5.  Blood Pressure and Early Mobilization After Total Hip and Knee Replacements: A Pilot Study on the Impact of Midodrine Hydrochloride.

Authors:  Michael Smits; Sandra Lin; Jessica Rahme; Michael Bailey; Rinaldo Bellomo; Andrew Hardidge
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-05-14

6.  Comparison of General and Spinal Anaesthesia on Systemic Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ha-Jung Kim; Priodarshi Roychoudhury; Stuti Lohia; Jin-Sun Kim; Hyung-Tae Kim; Young-Jin Ro; Won-Uk Koh
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  [Preoperative C-reactive protein level has a dose-response relationship with postoperative complications in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture].

Authors:  Changsheng Zhao; Junfeng Wang; Heng Zhang; Xiaohua Wang; Bin Sun; Ke Zhang; Bin Yang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.