Literature DB >> 27778511

Reversible G Protein βγ9 Distribution-Based Assay Reveals Molecular Underpinnings in Subcellular, Single-Cell, and Multicellular GPCR and G Protein Activity.

Kanishka Senarath1, Kasun Ratnayake1, Praneeth Siripurapu1, John L Payton1, Ajith Karunarathne1.   

Abstract

Current assays to measure the activation of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins are time-consuming, indirect, and expensive. Therefore, an efficient method which directly measures the ability of a ligand to govern GPCR-G protein interactions can help to understand the molecular underpinnings of the associated signaling. A live cell imaging-based approach is presented here to directly measure ligand-induced GPCR and G protein activity in real time. The number of active GPCRs governs G protein heterotrimer (αβγ) dissociation, thereby controlling the concentration of free βγ subunits. The described γ9 assay measures the GPCR activation-induced extent of the reversible βγ9 subunit exchange between the plasma membrane (PM) and internal membranes (IMs). Confocal microscopy-based γ9 assay quantitatively determines the concentration dependency of ligands on GPCR activation. Demonstrating the high-throughput screening (HTS) adaptability, the γ9 assay performed using an imaging plate reader measures the ligand-induced GPCR activation. This suggests that the γ9 assay can be employed to screen libraries of compounds for their ability to activate GPCRs. Together with subcellular optogenetics, the spatiotemporal sensitivity of the γ9 assay permits experimental determination of the limits of spatially restricted activation of GPCRs and G proteins in subcellular regions of single cells. This assay works effectively for GPCRs coupled to αi/o and αs heterotrimers, including light-sensitive GPCRs. In addition, computational modeling of experimental data from the assay is used to decipher intricate molecular details of the GPCR-G protein activation process. Overall, the γ9 assay provides a robust strategy for quantitative as well as qualitative determination of GPCR and G protein function on a single-cell, multicell, and subcellular level. This assay not only provides information about the inner workings of the signaling pathway, but it also strengthens GPCR deorphanization as well as drug discovery efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27778511     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  10 in total

1.  Blue light-triggered photochemistry and cytotoxicity of retinal.

Authors:  Kasun Ratnayake; John L Payton; Mitchell E Meger; Nipunika H Godage; Emanuela Gionfriddo; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 2.  Optical approaches for single-cell and subcellular analysis of GPCR-G protein signaling.

Authors:  Dinesh Kankanamge; Kasun Ratnayake; Kanishka Senarath; Mithila Tennakoon; Elise Harmon; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Statins Perturb Gβγ Signaling and Cell Behavior in a Gγ Subtype Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Mithila Tennakoon; Dinesh Kankanamge; Kanishka Senarath; Zehra Fasih; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Two independent but synchronized Gβγ subunit-controlled pathways are essential for trailing-edge retraction during macrophage migration.

Authors:  Praneeth Siripurapu; Dinesh Kankanamge; Kasun Ratnayake; Kanishka Senarath; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Gγ identity dictates efficacy of Gβγ signaling and macrophage migration.

Authors:  Kanishka Senarath; John L Payton; Dinesh Kankanamge; Praneeth Siripurapu; Mithila Tennakoon; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  G protein αq exerts expression level-dependent distinct signaling paradigms.

Authors:  Dinesh Kankanamge; Mithila Tennakoon; Amila Weerasinghe; Luis Cedeno-Rosario; Deborah N Chadee; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.315

7.  Dissociation of the G protein βγ from the Gq-PLCβ complex partially attenuates PIP2 hydrolysis.

Authors:  Dinesh Kankanamge; Sithurandi Ubeysinghe; Mithila Tennakoon; Priyanka Devi Pantula; Kishalay Mitra; Lopamudra Giri; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling.

Authors:  Mithila Tennakoon; Kanishka Senarath; Dinesh Kankanamge; Kasun Ratnayake; Dhanushan Wijayaratna; Koshala Olupothage; Sithurandi Ubeysinghe; Kimberly Martins-Cannavino; Terence E Hébert; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.850

9.  Blue light excited retinal intercepts cellular signaling.

Authors:  Kasun Ratnayake; John L Payton; O Harshana Lakmal; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A short C-terminal peptide in Gγ regulates Gβγ signaling efficacy.

Authors:  Mithila Tennakoon; Kanishka Senarath; Dinesh Kankanamge; Deborah N Chadee; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.138

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.