| Literature DB >> 27778156 |
Andrea Calvo1, Cristina Moglia1, Christian Lunetta2,3, Kalliopi Marinou4, Nicola Ticozzi5,6, Gianluca Drago Ferrante7, Carlo Scialo8, Gianni Sorarù9, Francesca Trojsi10, Amelia Conte11, Yuri M Falzone12, Rosanna Tortelli13, Massimo Russo14, Adriano Chiò1, Valeria Ada Sansone2,15, Gabriele Mora4, Vincenzo Silani5,6, Paolo Volanti7, Claudia Caponnetto8, Giorgia Querin9, Maria Rosaria Monsurrò10, Mario Sabatelli11,16, Nilo Riva12, Giancarlo Logroscino13, Sonia Messina3,14, Nicola Fini17, Jessica Mandrioli18.
Abstract
The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study is to investigate the role of clinical characteristics and therapeutic intervention on ALS prognosis. The study included patients diagnosed from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 in 13 Italian referral centers for ALS located in 10 Italian regions. Caring neurologists collected a detailed phenotypic profile and follow-up data until death into an electronic database. One center collected also data from a population-based registry for ALS. 2648 incident cases were collected. The median survival time from onset to death/tracheostomy was 44 months (SE 1.18, CI 42-46). According to univariate analysis, factors related to survival from onset to death/tracheostomy were: age at onset, diagnostic delay, site of onset, phenotype, degree of certainty at diagnosis according to revised El Escorial criteria (R-EEC), presence/absence of dementia, BMI at diagnosis, patients' provenance. In the multivariate analysis, age at onset, diagnostic delay, phenotypes but not site of onset, presence/absence of dementia, BMI, riluzole use, R-EEC criteria were independent prognostic factors of survival in ALS. We compared patients from an ALS Registry with patients from tertiary centers; the latter ones were younger, less frequently bulbar, but more frequently familial and definite at diagnosis. Our large, multicenter study demonstrated the role of some clinical and demographic factors on ALS survival, and showed some interesting differences between referral centers' patients and the general ALS population. These results can be helpful for clinical practice, in clinical trial design and to validate new tools to predict disease progression.Entities:
Keywords: ALS; Population-based registries; Prognostic factors; Referral centers; Survival
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27778156 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8313-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol ISSN: 0340-5354 Impact factor: 4.849