Literature DB >> 27777648

MIxS-HCR: a MIxS extension defining a minimal information standard for sequence data from environments pertaining to hydrocarbon resources.

Nicolas Tsesmetzis1, Pelin Yilmaz2, Peter C Marks1, Nikos C Kyrpides3, Ian M Head4, Bart P Lomans5.   

Abstract

Here we introduce a MIxS extension to facilitate the recording and cataloguing of metadata from samples related to hydrocarbon resources. The proposed MIxS-HCR package incorporates the core features of the MIxS standard for marker gene (MIMARKS) and metagenomic (MIMS) sequences along with a hydrocarbon resources customized environmental package. Adoption of the MIxS-HCR standard will enable the comparison and better contextualization of investigations related to hydrocarbon rich environments. The insights from such standardized way of reporting could be highly beneficial for the successful development and optimization of hydrocarbon recovery processes and management of microbiological issues in petroleum production systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental package; Hydrocarbon resources; MIxS standards; Sequence data

Year:  2016        PMID: 27777648      PMCID: PMC5059931          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0203-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Background

Hydrocarbon Occurrences are defined as the natural and artificial environmental features that are rich in hydrocarbons (Fig. 1). Hydrocarbon Occurrences that can be exploited in a commercially viable manner are designated as Hydrocarbon Resources (dotted frame in Fig. 1). HCRs currently cover over 80 % of our global energy needs and they will continue to do so through 2040 [1]. Contrary to the public perception, these hydrocarbon-rich environments are often inhabited by microorganisms. In situ processes including oil degradation, methane generation, and hydrogen sulfide production are to a great extent driven or accelerated by the activity of microorganisms in these systems [2]. Moreover, microorganisms are also implicated in metal corrosion and fouling of the hydrocarbon production and transport infrastructure [2]. If left uncontrolled, such microbial (or microbially influenced) processes can lead to adverse environmental and operational consequences. On the other hand, novel applications where microbes can play a more positive role in petroleum systems are becoming increasingly evident. These include hydrocarbon exploration, reservoir souring prevention, hydrocarbon upgrading and enhanced hydrocarbon and energy recovery.
Fig. 1

Hydrocarbon Resources as part of the Hydrocarbon Occurrences environmental features. Schematic of the break-down of Hydrocarbon Occurrences (HCOs) based on location and commercial exploitation potential. The hydrocarbon resources (HCRs), shown in the dotted frame, are further subdivided into different groups based on their associated reservoir rock properties and hydrocarbon type

Hydrocarbon Resources as part of the Hydrocarbon Occurrences environmental features. Schematic of the break-down of Hydrocarbon Occurrences (HCOs) based on location and commercial exploitation potential. The hydrocarbon resources (HCRs), shown in the dotted frame, are further subdivided into different groups based on their associated reservoir rock properties and hydrocarbon type Restraining or harnessing the potential of these microbes requires a considerable understanding of their metabolisms and role in these environments. Tools and methodologies that allow the enumeration, taxonomic identification, and metabolic prediction of these microbes are therefore essential towards this goal. Such methodologies will enable us to address questions relating to microbial spatiotemporal variability and what drives them within an HCR. This will also help us determine whether particular microorganisms were present in the HCR at the time of deposition or whether they were introduced at a later stage through fluid migration (e.g. during the formation or recovery of the hydrocarbon resource). Other interesting questions pertain to hydrocarbon recovery processes, and especially the effect of water injection (aka “water flooding”) on the indigenous and introduced microbial communities associated with HCRs. One particular operational issue related to this is stimulation of biogenic H2S production, an undesirable process better known as reservoir “souring”. Moreover, in terms of microbial monitoring, such methodologies will help us determine to what extent the indigenous microbial community of an HCR is represented by the analysis of readily recoverable produced fluids, and if analysis of produced fluids can reduce the need to analyze material directly recovered from the hydrocarbon rich formation, such as reservoir cores which are much more difficult to obtain. It will also be practically important if the analysis of planktonic populations from produced fluids can provide an alert to potential MIC phenomena caused by sessile populations. A growing inventory of HCR systems will also allow us to determine if specific beneficial or detrimental microbially catalyzed processes in HCRs are the result of the same microbial populations in most instances, or whether a particular process is driven by different organisms in different HCR environments. In addition to environmental parameters, the outcome from microbiological surveys of HCRs can be strongly impacted by logistical and technical constraints. These include sample acquisition, transport and preservation; the choice of DNA amplification primers (i.e. coverage, specificity, target gene); enumeration methods (i.e. MPN vs. ATP vs. qPCR vs. Phylochip vs. Next-Gen sequencing, etc.); sequencing platform (Sanger, 454, IonTorrent, Illumina, etc.) and related downstream bioinformatics pipelines.

Need for standards

There is a growing list of studies on HCRs, but their collective retrieval (or their corresponding sequences from public repositories) is currently impossible even with complex keyword searches. Moreover, the majority of available datasets lack sufficient contextual data, which would facilitate more comprehensive comparative analysis [3-6]. In order to maximize the knowledge gained from these largely unexplored microbial ecosystems it is important to formalize and standardize environment descriptors for studies of these habitats. It is equally important to define a minimum set of contextual parameters, which should accompany the submission of sequence information from HCR studies to the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration [7]. The adoption of such standardization would drastically improve the quality, accessibility and value of the HCR-related information residing in INSDC. The need for standardization is not novel or unique to HCR studies. Since 2005, the Genomic Standards Consortium [3, 4] has made remarkable efforts in proposing standards for genomic (MIGS) and metagenomic (MIMS) sequences [8, 9] as well as for marker genes (MIMARKS) [10] and biosynthetic gene clusters (MIBiG) [11]. Moreover, a single entry point to all the minimum information specifications was also proposed (Minimum Information about any Sequence; MIxS) [10]. Equally important, the GSC proposed a wide range of environmental packages, which cover a broad range of the commonly encountered environments in research studies (i.e. human- associated, soil, water, sediments, built environments, etc.) [10, 12]. Around the same time a separate effort aimed at the development of ENVO, a standardized and semantically controlled representation of environment descriptors was undertaken [13]. ENVO quickly became a core component of the MIxS specification. Despite being extensively developed for other environmental features and habitats, ENVO currently has very limited content related to HCR. For example, in the MIxS specification under the ENVO term biome only the subclasses aquatic biome, polar biome, and terrestrial biome are currently present. The term subterranean biome (or subterrestrial biome), which would include biomes related to certain HCR (e.g. hydrocarbon reservoir) as well as other subterranean biomes [14-16] is currently missing. Similarly, in the case of ENVO’s environmental feature branch, additional HCR terms such as gas reservoir, oil sand, and coalbed will need to be included in addition to the existing oil reservoir term. Finally, in the environmental material section of ENVO, HCR terms like formation water, injection water, drilling fluid, tailing pond and many more would supplement the existing oil field production water term. It is therefore apparent that expansion of ENVO to include HCR-related terms will greatly benefit the standardization of a growing number of studies on these environments. An initiative to introduce such HCR-related terms in ENVO is currently underway.

Implementation of a Hydrocarbon Resource Environmental package

In an effort to assist with the standardization of data acquisition and observations derived from HCR-related environments we introduce the MIxS-HCR minimum information standard. This standard is tailored for HCR-related studies and aims at capturing key environmental parameters influencing microbial activity in these environments and standardizing their method of reporting. This is accomplished by the adoption of terms (such as temperature, pressure, porosity, etc.) from previously reported environmental packages (i.e. Water, Sediment, Wastewater/Sludge, etc.) as well as the introduction of new checklist items specific to these environments. A checklist consisting of 93 fields from several disciplines including geology, geochemistry, petrophysics, reservoir engineering, and production chemistry has been compiled (Table 1 and [MIxS HCR detailed table] in Additional file 1). Some of the included terms pertain to the HCR entity as a whole whereas others concern the sample(s) acquired from that entity. Moreover, the checklist is divided into 5 sections to facilitate the grouping of items derived from the same type of analysis or the same topic (Table 1). These sections include general information about the HCR, descriptors related to the HCR’s production history, the sample’s hydrocarbon and water chemistry, sampling procedures, sample transport and storage conditions.
Table 1

MIxS-HCR package items. More detailed description of the field names is provided in the Additional file 1 [see MIxS HCR detailed table]

MIxS-HCR package
HCR general properties
 Hydrocarbon resource type
 Hydrocarbon type produced
 Basin name
 Field name
 Reservoir name
 Hydrocarbon resource original temperature
 Depth (TVDSS) of hydrocarbon resource temperature
 Hydrocarbon resource original pressure
 Depth (TVDSS) of hydrocarbon resource pressure
 Permeability
 Porosity
 Lithology
 Depositional environment
 Hydrocarbon resource geologic age
 Oil water contact depth
 Formation water salinity
 Sulfate in formation water
 Vfa in formation water
 Source rock kerogen type
 Source rock lithology
 Source rock depositional environment
 Source rock geologic age
HCR production properties
 Production start date
 Production rate
 Water production rate
 Water cut
 Injection water fraction
 Secondary and tertiary recovery methods and start date
 Injection water breakthrough date of specific well
 Biocide administration
 Biocide administration method
 Chemical treatment
 Chemical treatment method
 Corrosion rate at sample location
HCR sampling properties
 Sample well name
 Well identification number
 Sample type
 Sample subtype
 Sample collection point
 Temperature
 Pressure
 Sample true vertical depth subsea
 Sample measured depth
 Elevation
 Oxygenation status of sample
 Preservative added to sample
 Sample transport conditions
 Sample storage temperature
 Sample storage duration
 Sample storage location
 Sample vol., weight, or area swabbed for DNA extraction
 Organism count
 Organism count qPCR information
HCR water chemistry
 pH
 Sample salinity
 Alkalinity
 Sulfate
 Sulfide
 Total sulfur
 Nitrate
 Nitrite
 Ammonium
 Total nitrogen
 Dissolved iron
 Sodium
 Chloride
 Potassium
 Magnesium
 Calcium
 Total iron
 Dissolved organic carbon
 Dissolved inorganic carbon
 Dissolved inorganic phosphorus
 Total phosphorus
 Suspended solids
 Density
 Dissolved carbon dioxide
 Dissolved oxygen
 Volatile fatty acids
 Benzene
 Toluene
 Ethylbenzene
 Xylene
HCR hydrocarbon chemistry
 API gravity
 Total Acid Number
 Viscosity
 Pour point
 Saturates wt%
 Aromatics wt%
 Resins wt%
 Asphaltenes wt%
Other properties
 Miscellaneous parameter
 Additional info
MIxS-HCR package items. More detailed description of the field names is provided in the Additional file 1 [see MIxS HCR detailed table] Amongst the different minimal information standards mentioned above, the MIMS and MIMARKS survey sequence specifications are probably the most relevant ones for HCR-related studies as the majority of these studies involve single gene (i.e. 16S rRNA, dsr, nar, etc.) or whole metagenome surveys. As such, in addition to the HCR environmental package, the MIxS-HCR extension also includes a subset of the MIxS checklist containing MIMS and/or MIMARKS survey fields (depending on the study) (Additional file 1). This newly proposed MIxS-HCR minimum information standard provides the foundation for consistent capture and reporting of valuable contextual (i.e. environmental, biological and technical) information derived from HCR-related studies. An example of a MIxS-HCR- compliant report from a Brunei oil field is included in Additional file 1 [see MIxS HCR detailed table].

Development process & research community

The need for standardization of HCR-related biological information has been the topic of several conference and workshops discussions where both academia and industry acknowledged the importance of adhering to standardized ways of sharing and reporting information. MIxS-HCR minimum information standard is the joint effort of a multidisciplinary community from academia and industry including the GSC MIxS developers, environmental microbiologists, bioinformaticians, geochemists, reservoir engineers, production chemists and computer scientists. During its development, the proposed HCR environmental package sought feedback and endorsement from researchers in academia and industry working in this scientific field. A web forum was set up to promote the development and refinement of the package as well as stimulate discussion around the topic and its content [17]. Changes to the package were subject to the consensus-based agreement amongst the researchers involved in this effort. The continuous contribution to the web forum and the adoption of this standard by the research community are key elements for the success of this initiative. Like its first release, which has already gained approval by the GSC board, yearly reviews of the MIxS-HCR standard performed by the MIxS-HCR web forum coordinators [18] will be incorporated in the next available MIxS public release following review and approval by the GSC board. As with all GSC projects, news and updates pertaining to this standard are managed via the corresponding project page on the GSC website [19] but also through the MIxS-HCR web forum [17]. The latest GSC-approved downloadable version of the MIxS-HCR extension is available under the GSC MIxS extensions webpage where additional information such as a list of terms, contact details and project information are also provided [20]. Each field in the supplied spreadsheet is accompanied by a definition, an expected value (including controlled vocabulary terms where applicable), the number of occurrences each field may be used, a value syntax, a preferred unit (if applicable) and other relevant recommendations (see also [MIxS HCR detailed table] in Additional file 1). Endorsement of this MIxS-HCR minimum information standard by the GSC, strengthens the case for its incorporation by the INSDC in the list of prerequisites at the time of sequence submission. The MIxS-HCR minimum set will be complemented with other minimum sets (currently under development) describing hydrocarbon-rich environments which are not covered under the HCR term. These include anthropogenic hydrocarbon occurrences (e.g. oil and gas production systems) as well as surface and seabed hydrocarbon occurrences (e.g. cold seeps, outcrops, gas hydrates, etc.) (Fig. 1). Many of the MIxS-HCR fields are going to be shared across the different hydrocarbon occurrence types whereas new ones, specific for each of the other types, will also be proposed. Of particular importance will be the development of minimal information standards for sequence data from oil and gas production systems as these systems are allegedly subject to failures frequently attributed to MIC [21] raising environmental, safety and operational concerns.

Conclusions

The newly proposed MIxS-HCR minimum information standard provides the foundation for consistent capture and reporting of valuable contextual information derived from studies pertained to hydrocarbon resources. Its first release has already gained approval by the GSC board and will be incorporated in INSDC’s sequence submission process. A web forum has also been set up to promote MIxS-HCR future improvements and extension to cover a wider range of hydrocarbon occurrences. Active involvement of the research community and adoption of the MIxS-HCR standard are key elements to the success of this initiative.
  15 in total

1.  Molecular phylogenetic diversity of the microbial community associated with a high-temperature petroleum reservoir at an offshore oilfield.

Authors:  Hui Li; Shi-Zhong Yang; Bo-Zhong Mu; Zhao-Feng Rong; Jie Zhang
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Phylogenetic Diversity of Archaea and Bacteria in a Deep Subsurface Paleosol

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Analysis of alkane-dependent methanogenic community derived from production water of a high-temperature petroleum reservoir.

Authors:  Serge Maurice Mbadinga; Kai-Ping Li; Lei Zhou; Li-Ying Wang; Shi-Zhong Yang; Jin-Feng Liu; Ji-Dong Gu; Bo-Zhong Mu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Phylogenetic analysis of the microbial community in hypersaline petroleum produced water from the Campos Basin.

Authors:  Francine Piubeli; Matthew J Grossman; Fabiana Fantinatti-Garboggini; Lucia R Durrant
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications.

Authors:  Pelin Yilmaz; Renzo Kottmann; Dawn Field; Rob Knight; James R Cole; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Jack A Gilbert; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Anjanette Johnston; Guy Cochrane; Robert Vaughan; Christopher Hunter; Joonhong Park; Norman Morrison; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Peter Sterk; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Mark Bailey; Laura Baumgartner; Bruce W Birren; Martin J Blaser; Vivien Bonazzi; Tim Booth; Peer Bork; Frederic D Bushman; Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Patrick S G Chain; Emily Charlson; Elizabeth K Costello; Heather Huot-Creasy; Peter Dawyndt; Todd DeSantis; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Rachel E Gallery; Dirk Gevers; Richard A Gibbs; Inigo San Gil; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey I Gordon; Robert Guralnick; Wolfgang Hankeln; Sarah Highlander; Philip Hugenholtz; Janet Jansson; Andrew L Kau; Scott T Kelley; Jerry Kennedy; Dan Knights; Omry Koren; Justin Kuczynski; Nikos Kyrpides; Robert Larsen; Christian L Lauber; Teresa Legg; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Wolfgang Ludwig; Donna Lyons; Eamonn Maguire; Barbara A Methé; Folker Meyer; Brian Muegge; Sara Nakielny; Karen E Nelson; Diana Nemergut; Josh D Neufeld; Lindsay K Newbold; Anna E Oliver; Norman R Pace; Giriprakash Palanisamy; Jörg Peplies; Joseph Petrosino; Lita Proctor; Elmar Pruesse; Christian Quast; Jeroen Raes; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jacques Ravel; David A Relman; Susanna Assunta-Sansone; Patrick D Schloss; Lynn Schriml; Rohini Sinha; Michelle I Smith; Erica Sodergren; Aymé Spo; Jesse Stombaugh; James M Tiedje; Doyle V Ward; George M Weinstock; Doug Wendel; Owen White; Andrew Whiteley; Andreas Wilke; Jennifer R Wortman; Tanya Yatsunenko; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Subsurface microbial diversity in deep-granitic-fracture water in Colorado.

Authors:  Jason W Sahl; Raleigh Schmidt; Elizabeth D Swanner; Kevin W Mandernack; Alexis S Templeton; Thomas L Kieft; Richard L Smith; William E Sanford; Robert L Callaghan; Jeffry B Mitton; John R Spear
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster.

Authors:  Marnix H Medema; Renzo Kottmann; Pelin Yilmaz; Matthew Cummings; John B Biggins; Kai Blin; Irene de Bruijn; Yit Heng Chooi; Jan Claesen; R Cameron Coates; Pablo Cruz-Morales; Srikanth Duddela; Stephanie Düsterhus; Daniel J Edwards; David P Fewer; Neha Garg; Christoph Geiger; Juan Pablo Gomez-Escribano; Anja Greule; Michalis Hadjithomas; Anthony S Haines; Eric J N Helfrich; Matthew L Hillwig; Keishi Ishida; Adam C Jones; Carla S Jones; Katrin Jungmann; Carsten Kegler; Hyun Uk Kim; Peter Kötter; Daniel Krug; Joleen Masschelein; Alexey V Melnik; Simone M Mantovani; Emily A Monroe; Marcus Moore; Nathan Moss; Hans-Wilhelm Nützmann; Guohui Pan; Amrita Pati; Daniel Petras; F Jerry Reen; Federico Rosconi; Zhe Rui; Zhenhua Tian; Nicholas J Tobias; Yuta Tsunematsu; Philipp Wiemann; Elizabeth Wyckoff; Xiaohui Yan; Grace Yim; Fengan Yu; Yunchang Xie; Bertrand Aigle; Alexander K Apel; Carl J Balibar; Emily P Balskus; Francisco Barona-Gómez; Andreas Bechthold; Helge B Bode; Rainer Borriss; Sean F Brady; Axel A Brakhage; Patrick Caffrey; Yi-Qiang Cheng; Jon Clardy; Russell J Cox; René De Mot; Stefano Donadio; Mohamed S Donia; Wilfred A van der Donk; Pieter C Dorrestein; Sean Doyle; Arnold J M Driessen; Monika Ehling-Schulz; Karl-Dieter Entian; Michael A Fischbach; Lena Gerwick; William H Gerwick; Harald Gross; Bertolt Gust; Christian Hertweck; Monica Höfte; Susan E Jensen; Jianhua Ju; Leonard Katz; Leonard Kaysser; Jonathan L Klassen; Nancy P Keller; Jan Kormanec; Oscar P Kuipers; Tomohisa Kuzuyama; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hyung-Jin Kwon; Sylvie Lautru; Rob Lavigne; Chia Y Lee; Bai Linquan; Xinyu Liu; Wen Liu; Andriy Luzhetskyy; Taifo Mahmud; Yvonne Mast; Carmen Méndez; Mikko Metsä-Ketelä; Jason Micklefield; Douglas A Mitchell; Bradley S Moore; Leonilde M Moreira; Rolf Müller; Brett A Neilan; Markus Nett; Jens Nielsen; Fergal O'Gara; Hideaki Oikawa; Anne Osbourn; Marcia S Osburne; Bohdan Ostash; Shelley M Payne; Jean-Luc Pernodet; Miroslav Petricek; Jörn Piel; Olivier Ploux; Jos M Raaijmakers; José A Salas; Esther K Schmitt; Barry Scott; Ryan F Seipke; Ben Shen; David H Sherman; Kaarina Sivonen; Michael J Smanski; Margherita Sosio; Evi Stegmann; Roderich D Süssmuth; Kapil Tahlan; Christopher M Thomas; Yi Tang; Andrew W Truman; Muriel Viaud; Jonathan D Walton; Christopher T Walsh; Tilmann Weber; Gilles P van Wezel; Barrie Wilkinson; Joanne M Willey; Wolfgang Wohlleben; Gerard D Wright; Nadine Ziemert; Changsheng Zhang; Sergey B Zotchev; Rainer Breitling; Eriko Takano; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Norman Morrison; Barry Smith; Christopher J Mungall; Suzanna E Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-12-11

10.  The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration.

Authors:  Yasukazu Nakamura; Guy Cochrane; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  MetaHCR: a web-enabled metagenome data management system for hydrocarbon resources.

Authors:  Peter C Marks; Marc Bigler; Eric B Alsop; Adrien Vigneron; Bart P Lomans; Renato De Paula; Brett Geissler; Nicolas Tsesmetzis
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Microbial Biotechnology 2020; microbiology of fossil fuel resources.

Authors:  Ian M Head; Neil D Gray
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 5.813

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.