Literature DB >> 27777219

Prostate Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Tuomas P Kilpeläinen, Kirsi Talala, Jani Raitanen, Kimmo Taari, Paula Kujala, Teuvo L J Tammela, Anssi Auvinen.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) screening remains controversial. We investigated whether screening reduces the difference in prostate cancer risk by socioeconomic status (SES). In 1996-2011, a total of 72,139 men from the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer were analyzed. Outcome measures were PC incidence, mortality, and participation in screening. SES indicators were educational level, income, and home ownership status (data obtained from the Statistics Finland registry). The mean duration of follow-up was 12.7 years. Higher SES was associated with a higher incidence of low- to moderate-risk PC but with a lower risk of advanced PC. Higher education was associated with significantly lower PC mortality in both control and screening arms (risk ratio = 0.48-0.69; P < 0.05). Higher income was also associated with lower PC mortality but only in the control arm (risk ratio = 0.45-0.73; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in SES gradient by arm (Pinteraction = 0.33 and Pinteraction = 0.47 for primary vs. secondary education and primary vs. tertiary education, respectively; Pinteraction = 0.65 and Pinteraction = 0.09 for low vs. intermediate income and low vs. high income, respectively; and Pinteraction = 0.27 among home ownership status strata). Substantial gradients by SES in PC incidence and mortality were observed in the control arm. Higher SES was associated with overdiagnosis of low-risk PC and, conversely, lower risk of incurable PC and lower PC mortality. Special attention should be directed toward recruiting men with low SES to participate in population-based cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27777219     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  16 in total

1.  Usual adult occupation and risk of prostate cancer in West African men: the Ghana Prostate Study.

Authors:  Colin Adler; Melissa C Friesen; Edward D Yeboah; Yao Tettey; Richard B Biritwum; Andrew A Adjei; Evelyn Tay; Victoria Okyne; James E Mensah; Ann Truelove; Baiyu Yang; Scott P Kelly; Cindy Ke Zhou; Lauren E McCullough; Larissa Pardo; Robert N Hoover; Ann W Hsing; Michael B Cook; Stella Koutros
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Eighteen-year follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: effect of sociodemographic variables on participation, prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Sigrid V Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Anna Grenabo Bergdahl; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.612

3.  Socioeconomic Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Health Disparities in Children and Adolescents in a Mixed Rural-Urban Community-Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  Kara A Bjur; Chung-Il Wi; Euijung Ryu; Chris Derauf; Sheri S Crow; Katherine S King; Young J Juhn
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Geographical variations of socioeconomic status and prostate cancer mortality in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Yung Su
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Placing prostate cancer disparities within a psychosocial context: challenges and opportunities for future research.

Authors:  Adolfo G Cuevas; Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Leslie Cofie; Masayoshi Zaitsu; Jennifer Allen; David R Williams
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer.

Authors:  Amanda Bobridge; Kay Price; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Multi-disciplinary and shared decision-making approach in the management of organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Syed M Nazim; Mohamed Fawzy; Christian Bach; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence in Europe: a comprehensive review of population-based epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Ana Mihor; Sonja Tomsic; Tina Zagar; Katarina Lokar; Vesna Zadnik
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Mia Djulbegovic; Jae Hung Jung; Eu Chang Hwang; Qi Zhou; Anne Cleves; Thomas Agoritsas; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  The respective parts of incidence and lethality in socioeconomic differences in cancer mortality. An analysis of the French network Cancer registries (FRANCIM) data.

Authors:  Joséphine Bryere; Laure Tron; Gwenn Menvielle; Guy Launoy
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.