Stacy Cooper Bailey1, Michael K Paasche-Orlow2, William G Adams3, Samantha A Brokenshire4, Laura A Hedlund, Ryan P Hickson4, Christine U Oramasionwu4, Amy L Moore, Danielle M McCarthy, Laura M Curtis5, Mary J Kwasny6, Michael S Wolf5. 1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. Electronic address: scbailey@unc.edu. 2. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Section of Pediatrics, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. 4. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. 5. Health Literacy and Learning Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States. 6. Deparment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Adverse drug events (ADEs) affect millions of patients annually and place a significant burden on the healthcare system. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed patient safety information for high-risk medications that pose serious public health concerns. However, there are currently few assurances that patients receive this information or are able to identify or respond correctly to ADEs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Electronic Medication Complete Communication (EMC2) Strategy to promote safe medication use and reporting of ADEs in comparison to usual care. METHODS: The automated EMC2 Strategy consists of: 1) provider alerts to counsel patients on medication risks, 2) the delivery of patient-friendly medication information via the electronic health record, and 3) an automated telephone assessment to identify potential medication concerns or ADEs. The study will take place in two community health centers in Chicago, IL. Adult, English or Spanish-speaking patients (N=1200) who have been prescribed a high-risk medication will be enrolled and randomized to the intervention arm or usual care based upon practice location. The primary outcomes of the study are medication knowledge, proper medication use, and reporting of ADEs; these will be measured at baseline, 4weeks, and three months. Intervention fidelity as well as barriers and costs of implementation will be evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The EMC2 Strategy automates a patient-friendly risk communication and surveillance process to promote safe medication use while minimizing clinic burden. This trial seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of this strategy in comparison to usual care.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) affect millions of patients annually and place a significant burden on the healthcare system. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed patient safety information for high-risk medications that pose serious public health concerns. However, there are currently few assurances that patients receive this information or are able to identify or respond correctly to ADEs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Electronic Medication Complete Communication (EMC2) Strategy to promote safe medication use and reporting of ADEs in comparison to usual care. METHODS: The automated EMC2 Strategy consists of: 1) provider alerts to counsel patients on medication risks, 2) the delivery of patient-friendly medication information via the electronic health record, and 3) an automated telephone assessment to identify potential medication concerns or ADEs. The study will take place in two community health centers in Chicago, IL. Adult, English or Spanish-speaking patients (N=1200) who have been prescribed a high-risk medication will be enrolled and randomized to the intervention arm or usual care based upon practice location. The primary outcomes of the study are medication knowledge, proper medication use, and reporting of ADEs; these will be measured at baseline, 4weeks, and three months. Intervention fidelity as well as barriers and costs of implementation will be evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The EMC2 Strategy automates a patient-friendly risk communication and surveillance process to promote safe medication use while minimizing clinic burden. This trial seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of this strategy in comparison to usual care.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Florence T Bourgeois; Michael W Shannon; Clarissa Valim; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Leslie R Harrold; Jeffrey Rothschild; Kristin Debellis; Andrew C Seger; Cynthia Cadoret; Leslie S Fish; Lawrence Garber; Michael Kelleher; David W Bates Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Stacy C Bailey; Marina Serper; Meredith Smith; Terry C Davis; Allison L Russell; Beenish S Manzoor; Lisa Belter; Ruth M Parker; Bruce Lambert Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Terry S Field; Kathleen M Mazor; Becky Briesacher; Kristin R Debellis; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Seth C Kalichman; Christina M Amaral; Heidi Stearns; Denise White; Jody Flanagan; Howard Pope; Chauncey Cherry; Demetria Cain; Lisa Eaton; Moira O Kalichman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William H Shrank; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Niteesh K Choudhry; Michael S Wolf; Aaron S Kesselheim; Jerry Avorn; Paul Shekelle Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-09-10
Authors: Carl May; Tracy Finch; Frances Mair; Luciana Ballini; Christopher Dowrick; Martin Eccles; Linda Gask; Anne MacFarlane; Elizabeth Murray; Tim Rapley; Anne Rogers; Shaun Treweek; Paul Wallace; George Anderson; Jo Burns; Ben Heaven Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 2.655