OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of a telephone call reminder program provided by a campus-based medication therapy management call center on medication adherence in Medicare Advantage Part D (MAPD) beneficiaries with hypertension. METHODS: The reminder call services were offered to eligible MAPD beneficiaries, and they included a live interactive conversation with patients to assess the use of their medications. This study used a quasi-experimental design for comparing the change in medication adherence between the intervention and matched control groups. Adherence, defined by proportion of days covered (PDC), was measured using incurred medication claims 6 months before and after the adherence program was implemented. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score matching was used. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, paired samples included 563 patients in each of the intervention and control groups. The mean PDC (standard deviation) increased significantly during postintervention period by 17.3% (33.6; P <0.001) and 13.8% (32.3; P <0.001) for the intervention and the control groups, respectively; the greater difference-in-differences increase of 3.5% (36.3) in the intervention group over the control group was statistically significant (P = 0.022). A generalized estimating equation model adjusting for covariates further confirmed that the reminder call group had a significant increase in pre-post PDC (P = 0.021), as compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive medication adherence increased in both reminder call and control groups, but the increase was significantly higher in the intervention group. A telephonic outreach program was effective in improving antihypertensive medication adherence in MAPD beneficiaries.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of a telephone call reminder program provided by a campus-based medication therapy management call center on medication adherence in Medicare Advantage Part D (MAPD) beneficiaries with hypertension. METHODS: The reminder call services were offered to eligible MAPD beneficiaries, and they included a live interactive conversation with patients to assess the use of their medications. This study used a quasi-experimental design for comparing the change in medication adherence between the intervention and matched control groups. Adherence, defined by proportion of days covered (PDC), was measured using incurred medication claims 6 months before and after the adherence program was implemented. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score matching was used. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, paired samples included 563 patients in each of the intervention and control groups. The mean PDC (standard deviation) increased significantly during postintervention period by 17.3% (33.6; P <0.001) and 13.8% (32.3; P <0.001) for the intervention and the control groups, respectively; the greater difference-in-differences increase of 3.5% (36.3) in the intervention group over the control group was statistically significant (P = 0.022). A generalized estimating equation model adjusting for covariates further confirmed that the reminder call group had a significant increase in pre-post PDC (P = 0.021), as compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive medication adherence increased in both reminder call and control groups, but the increase was significantly higher in the intervention group. A telephonic outreach program was effective in improving antihypertensive medication adherence in MAPD beneficiaries.