Literature DB >> 27777059

Metabolic Mechanisms of Vocal Fatigue.

Chayadevie Nanjundeswaran1, Jessie VanSwearingen2, Katherine Verdolini Abbott3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify potential metabolic mechanisms including (1) neuromuscular inefficiency, (2) cardiovascular recovery deficits, or (3) both, in individuals with complaints of vocal fatigue. STUDY
DESIGN: Within- and between-subjects group design was used in this study.
METHODS: Three groups of women participated in the study, including (1) individuals with complaints of vocal fatigue; (2) vocally healthy sedentary individuals; and (3) vocally healthy, cardiovascularly conditioned individuals. Group assignment was based on results from the Vocal Fatigue Index, laryngeal examination, and self-report regarding exercise regimens. Metabolic profiles were obtained using gas exchange measures monitored during vocal task performance (reading) at two different loudness levels, and during recovery from reading.
RESULTS: Statistical analyses did not reveal reliable group differences in metabolic cost for or recovery from vocal tasks. However, descriptive review of oxygen uptake and recovery kinetics revealed patterns indicating reliance on differential energy resources for the vocal task in individuals with vocal fatigue compared with cardiovascularly trained, vocally healthy individuals in particular. Slow oxygen uptake kinetics at task onset was a characteristic of the vocal fatigue group, indicating a general reliance on anaerobic resources to meet the demands of the vocal task, pointing to possible neuromuscular inefficiency. Individuals with vocal fatigue also demonstrated an increase in oxygen consumption following vocal task compared with cardiovascularly trained individuals, suggesting possible cardiovascular recovery deficits.
CONCLUSION: This study provides initial data relevant to possible metabolic mechanisms of vocal fatigue and the potential relevance of aerobic conditioning in individuals with such fatigue.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic conditioning; Gas exchange; Neuromuscular inefficiency; Oxygen uptake kinetics; Vocal fatigue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27777059     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  7 in total

1.  Toward a Consensus Description of Vocal Effort, Vocal Load, Vocal Loading, and Vocal Fatigue.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Eva van Leer; Miriam van Mersbergen; Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran; Pasquale Bottalico; Mary J Sandage; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  SARS-CoV-2 Detection From Voice.

Authors:  Gadi Pinkas; Yarden Karny; Aviad Malachi; Galia Barkai; Gideon Bachar; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-24

3.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Vocal Fatigue Index in Teachers Using Mokken Analysis.

Authors:  Chaya Nanjundeswaran; Miriam van Mersbergen; Russell Banks; Eric Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  The effects of vocal exertion on lung volume measurements and acoustics in speakers reporting high and low vocal fatigue.

Authors:  Robert Brinton Fujiki; Jessica E Huber; M Preeti Sivasankar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Vocal fatigue perceived in remote working by teachers of different school grades during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Giovanna Cantarella; Luca Negri; Giuseppina Bernardelli; Letizia Nitro; Mirko Aldè; Lorenzo Pignataro; Antonella Delle Fave
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 7.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.