Literature DB >> 27776926

Ultrasound evaluation of the subacromial space in healthy subjects performing three different positions of shoulder abduction in both loaded and unloaded conditions.

Stefano Longo1, Alberto Corradi2, Giovanni Michielon3, Francesco Sardanelli4, Luca Maria Sconfienza5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subacromial space (SS) narrowing may result in unsafe contact of rotator cuff tendons and bursa with the acromion, possibly promoting rotator cuff pathologies and pain. We measured SS in asymptomatic subjects after three movements employed for shoulder muscles' training. PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twenty-five males (age 24±5years; stature 175±8 cm; body mass 74±12 kg) underwent SS ultrasound evaluation while executing with (WL) and without (NL) 4-kg load: 90° shoulder abduction (SA) without humerus rotation (90°neutral); 90° SA maximal humeral external rotation (90°er); maximum SA (above 90°) during upright row (UR). For inter-operator reliability analysis, a subset of 12 subjects was assessed by two operators.
RESULTS: Intra/inter-operator reliability coefficients were high (ICC>0.87; standard error of measurement range: 0.23-0.51 mm; minimum detectable change range: 0.61-1.79 mm). ANOVA revealed significant differences between loads (p = 0.003, η2 = 0.37) and angles (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.72), and interaction (p = 0.004, η2 = 0.45). Normalized SS values WL were higher at 90°er vs. 90°neutral and UR (p < 0.001 for both). Differences in NL were found between 90°neutral and both 90°er (p = 0.002) and UR (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: When holding a 4-kg load, SS is larger at 90°er than at 90°neutral and UR shoulder abduction positions. In unloaded condition, SS at 90°neutral is reduced compared to 90°er and UR.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateral rise; Subacromial space; Ultrasound; Upright row

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27776926     DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther Sport        ISSN: 1466-853X            Impact factor:   2.365


  5 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Motion Sequence Disrupted.

Authors:  Norbert M Hien
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Reporting rotator cuff tears on magnetic resonance arthrography using the Snyder's arthroscopic classification.

Authors:  Alberto Aliprandi; Carmelo Messina; Paolo Arrigoni; Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Stefano Longo; Sandro Magnani; Chiara Mattiuz; Filippo Randelli; Silvana Sdao; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28

Review 4.  Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: from diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  Vito Chianca; Domenico Albano; Carmelo Messina; Federico Midiri; Giovanni Mauri; Alberto Aliprandi; Michele Catapano; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Cristian Giuseppe Monaco; Salvatore Gitto; Anna Pisani Mainini; Angelo Corazza; Santi Rapisarda; Grazia Pozzi; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-01-19

5.  Evaluation of acromial spur using ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; Syungkyun Choi; Soo Bin Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2021-02-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.