D R Herrera1, F C Martinho1,2, A de-Jesus-Soares1, A A Zaia1, C C R Ferraz1, J F A Almeida1, B P F A Gomes1. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Jose dos Campos Dental School, State University of São Paulo, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
AIM: This clinical study was conducted to investigate the influence of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ultrasonic activation after chemomechanical preparation (CMP) on eliminating/reducing oral bacterial lipopolysaccharides (known as endotoxins) and cultivable bacteria in teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: Samples were taken from 24 root canals at several clinical periods: S1 - before CMP; S2 - after CMP; S3 - after EDTA: G1 - with ultrasonic activation (n = 12) and G2 - without ultrasonic activation (n = 12). Root canals were instrumented using Mtwo rotary files. Culture techniques were used to determine the number of colony-forming units (CFU). Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) was used to measure endotoxin levels. Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the amount of bacteria and endotoxin levels in each period (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Endotoxins and cultivable bacteria were recovered in 100% of the initial samples (S1). CMP was effective in reducing endotoxins and bacterial load (all with P < 0.05). Higher values of endotoxin reduction were achieved with EDTA ultrasonic activation [G1, 0.02 EU mL-1 (range 0.01-0.75)] compared with the no activation group [G2, 1.13 EU mL-1 (range 0.01-8.34)] (P < 0.05). Regarding bacterial reduction, no statistically significant difference was found in S3, regardless of the group (G1, G2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chemomechanical preparation was effective in reducing bacteria and endotoxins, but could not completely eliminate them. The ultrasonic activation of EDTA was effective in further reducing endotoxin levels in the root canals of teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis.
AIM: This clinical study was conducted to investigate the influence of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) ultrasonic activation after chemomechanical preparation (CMP) on eliminating/reducing oral bacterial lipopolysaccharides (known as endotoxins) and cultivable bacteria in teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: Samples were taken from 24 root canals at several clinical periods: S1 - before CMP; S2 - after CMP; S3 - after EDTA: G1 - with ultrasonic activation (n = 12) and G2 - without ultrasonic activation (n = 12). Root canals were instrumented using Mtwo rotary files. Culture techniques were used to determine the number of colony-forming units (CFU). Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) was used to measure endotoxin levels. Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the amount of bacteria and endotoxin levels in each period (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Endotoxins and cultivable bacteria were recovered in 100% of the initial samples (S1). CMP was effective in reducing endotoxins and bacterial load (all with P < 0.05). Higher values of endotoxin reduction were achieved with EDTA ultrasonic activation [G1, 0.02 EU mL-1 (range 0.01-0.75)] compared with the no activation group [G2, 1.13 EU mL-1 (range 0.01-8.34)] (P < 0.05). Regarding bacterial reduction, no statistically significant difference was found in S3, regardless of the group (G1, G2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chemomechanical preparation was effective in reducing bacteria and endotoxins, but could not completely eliminate them. The ultrasonic activation of EDTA was effective in further reducing endotoxin levels in the root canals of teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis.
Authors: Ranya Elsayed; Pheba Abraham; Mohamed E Awad; Zoya Kurago; Balasudha Baladhandayutham; Gary M Whitford; David H Pashley; Charles E McKenna; Mohammed E Elsalanty Journal: Bone Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Frederico C Martinho; Bruna J M Corazza; Rayana D Khoury; Esteban I F Orozco; Cassia C Toia; Felipe P Machado; Marcia C Valera Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Marlos Barbosa-Ribeiro; Rodrigo Arruda-Vasconcelos; Adriana de-Jesus-Soares; Alexandre Augusto Zaia; Caio Cezar Randi Ferraz; José Flávio Affonso de Almeida; Brenda P F A Gomes Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Gustavo G Nascimento; Diego G D Rabello; Bruna J M Corazza; Ana P M Gomes; Eduardo G Silva; Frederico C Martinho Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Johnathan P Velardi; Theeb A Alquria; Rayyan A Alfirdous; Bruna J M Corazza; Ana P M Gomes; Eduardo G Silva; Ina L Griffin; Patricia A Tordik; Frederico C Martinho Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 4.379