| Literature DB >> 27775591 |
Yi-Ju Hsu1, Wen-Ching Huang2, Chien-Chao Chiu3, Yan-Lin Liu4, Wan-Chun Chiu5, Chun-Hui Chiu6, Yen-Shuo Chiu7,8,9, Chi-Chang Huang10.
Abstract
Chili pepper is used as a food, seasoning and has been revered for its medicinal and health claims. It is very popular and is the most common spice worldwide. Capsaicin (CAP) is a major pungent and bioactive phytochemical in chili peppers. CAP has been shown to improve mitochondrial biogenesis and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. However, there is limited evidence around the effects of CAP on physical fatigue and exercise performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of CAP on anti-fatigue and ergogenic functions following physiological challenge. Female Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice from four groups (n = 8 per group) were orally administered CAP for 4 weeks at 0, 205, 410, and 1025 mg/kg/day, which were respectively designated the vehicle, CAP-1X, CAP-2X, and CAP-5X groups. The anti-fatigue activity and exercise performance was evaluated using forelimb grip strength, exhaustive swimming time, and levels of serum lactate, ammonia, glucose, BUN (blood urea nitrogen) and creatine kinase (CK) after a 15-min swimming exercise. The grip strength and exhaustive swimming time of the CAP-5X group were significantly higher than other groups. CAP supplementation dose-dependently reduced serum lactate, ammonia, BUN and CK levels, and increased glucose concentration after the 15-min swimming test. In addition, CAP also increased hepatic glycogen content, an important energy source for exercise. The possible mechanism was relevant to energy homeostasis and the physiological modulations by CAP supplementation. Therefore, our results suggest that CAP supplementation may have a wide spectrum of bioactivities for promoting health, performance improvement and fatigue amelioration.Entities:
Keywords: anti-fatigue; capsaicin; exercise performance; forelimb grip strength; glycogen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27775591 PMCID: PMC5084035 DOI: 10.3390/nu8100648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of capsaicin (CAP) in the supplement sample (mAU: milli absorbance units; Rt: Retention time).
Figure 2The effect of CAP supplementation on growth curve. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice per group.
General characteristics of the experimental groups with capsaicin supplementation.
| Characteristic | Vehicle | CAP-1X | CAP-2X | CAP-5X | Trend Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial BW (g) | 26.8 ± 0.4 | 26.4 ± 0.5 | 26.0 ± 0.4 | 26.5 ± 0.5 | 0.1161 |
| Final BW (g) | 30.3 ± 0.7 | 29.3 ± 0.9 | 29.7 ± 0.7 | 29.1 ± 0.6 | 0.3282 |
| Food intake (g/day) | 5.57 ± 0.02 b | 5.52 ± 0.26 a,b | 5.17± 0.00 a | 5.34 ± 0.03 a,b | 0.6056 |
| Water intake (mL/day) | 6.37± 0.08 b | 6.14 ± 0.22 a,b | 5.86 ± 0.03 a | 6.14 ± 0.20 a,b | 0.0875 |
| Liver (g) | 1.41 ± 0.04 | 1.37 ± 0.04 | 1.37 ± 0.04 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 0.2536 |
| Muscle (g) | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.6938 |
| Kidney (g) | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.9420 |
| Heart (g) | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.00 | 0.16 ± 0.00 | 0.7942 |
| UFP (g) | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.7942 |
| BAT (g) | 0.08 ± 0.003 | 0.09 ± 0.002 | 0.08 ± 0.004 | 0.09 ± 0.003 | 0.9519 |
| Relative liver weight (%) | 4.73 ± 0.18 | 4.92 ± 0.10 | 4.73 ± 0.18 | 5.03 ± 0.14 | 0.3336 |
| Relative muscle weight (%) | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 0.3257 |
| Relative kidney weight (%) | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 1.28 ± 0.03 | 1.31 ± 0.03 | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 0.9771 |
| Relative heart weight (%) | 0.59 ± 0.03 b | 0.54 ± 0.03 a,b | 0.51 ± 0.02 a | 0.56 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.6981 |
| Relative UFP weight (%) | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.05 | 0.9121 |
| Relative BAT weight (%) | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.5119 |
Data are the mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Values in the same row with different superscript letters (a, b) differ significantly, p < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA; Muscle mass includes both gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the back part of the lower legs. BW: Body weight; UFP: Uterine fat pads; BAT: Brown adipose tissue. Low-dose (CAP-1X), medium-dose (CAP-2X) and high-dose (CAP-5X) CAP at 250, 410 and 1025 mg/kg/day, respectively.
Figure 3Effect of CAP supplementation on forelimb grip strength. (A) Grip strength; (B) Relative grip strength. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA. Low-dose (CAP-1X), medium-dose (CAP-2X) and high-dose (CAP-5X) CAP at 205, 410 and 1025 mg/kg/day, respectively.
Figure 4Effect of CAP supplementation on exhaustive swimming test. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 5Effect of CAP supplementation on serum (A) lactate; (B) ammonia; (C) glucose; (D) blood urea nitrogen (BUN); and (E) creatine kinase (CK) levels after acute exercise challenge. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 6Effect of CAP supplementation on glycogen content in (A) liver and (B) muscle. Data are mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Biochemical analysis at the end of treatment.
| Parameter | Vehicle | CAP-1X | CAP-2X | CAP-5X | Trend Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 95 ± 5 b | 80 ± 2 a | 80 ± 3 a | 77 ± 3 a | 0.0003 |
| ALT (U/L) | 45 ± 3 d | 37 ± 2 c | 31 ±1 a,b | 30 ± 2 a | <0.0001 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.26 ± 0.04 | 3.28 ± 0.04 | 3.26 ± 0.04 | 3.28 ± 0.03 | 0.8838 |
| TP (g/dL) | 5.04 ± 0.06 | 4.98 ± 0.07 | 5.04 ± 0.05 | 5.05 ± 0.02 | 0.5837 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 22.3 ± 0.6 c | 18.8 ± 0.3 b | 17.9 ± 0.2 b | 16.6 ± 0.5 a | <0.0001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.29 ± 0.01 c | 0.25 ± 0.01 b | 0.24 ± 0.01 b | 0.20 ± 0.01 a | <0.0001 |
| UA (mg/dL) | 1.75 ± 0.11 b | 1.01 ± 0.09 a | 0.90 ± 0.07 a | 0.79 ± 0.04 a | <0.0001 |
| CK (U/L) | 259 ± 24 d | 173 ± 12 c | 126 ± 10 a,b | 101 ± 7 a | <0.0001 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 111 ± 3 | 103 ± 4 | 104 ± 5 | 102 ± 5 | 0.1701 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 152 ± 5 b | 147 ± 4 b,c | 138 ± 6 a,c | 134 ± 3 a | 0.0014 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 154 ± 3 | 153 ± 4 | 158 ± 2 | 158 ± 3 | 0.5448 |
Data are the mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice in each group. Values in the same row with different superscript letters (a, b, c) differ significantly, p < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA; Muscle mass includes both gastrocnemius and soleus muscles in the back part of the lower legs. AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; TP: Total protein; BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; CK: Creatine kinase; UA: Uric acid; TC: Total cholesterol; TG: Triacylglycerol.
Figure 7Effect of CAP supplementation on morphology of (A) liver; (B) skeletal muscle; (C) heart; (D) kidney; and (E) uterine fat pad in mice. Specimens were photographed by light microscopy. (H&E stain, magnification: ×200; Scale bar, 40 μm).