Literature DB >> 2777548

Estimating Rn-induced lung cancer in the United States.

J H Lubin1, J D Boice.   

Abstract

The proportion of lung cancer deaths attributable to Rn among residents of single-family homes in the U.S. (approximately 70% of the housing stock) is estimated using the log-normal distribution of Rn concentrations proposed by Nero et al. (1986) and the risk model developed by the National Academy of Sciences' BEIR IV Committee. The risk model, together with the exposure distribution, predicts that approximately 14% of lung cancer deaths among such residents (about 13,300 deaths per year, or 10% of all U.S. lung cancer deaths) may be due to indoor Rn exposure. The 95% confidence interval is 7%-25%, or approximately 6600 to 24,000 lung cancer deaths. These estimated attributable risks due to Rn are similar for males and females and for smokers and nonsmokers, but higher baseline risks of lung cancer result in much larger absolute numbers of Rn-attributable cancers among males (approximately 9000) and among smokers (approximately 11,000). Because of the apparent skewness of the exposure distribution, most of the contribution to the attributable risks arises from exposure rates below 148 Bq m-3 (4 pCi L-1), i.e., below the EPA "action level." As a result, if all exposure rates that exceed 148 Bq m-3 (approximately 8% of homes) were eliminated, the models predict that the total annual lung cancer burden in the U.S. would drop by 4-5%, or by about 3800 lung cancer deaths, in contrast to a maximum reduction of 14% if all indoor Rn exposure above the 1st percentile were eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2777548     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-198909000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  13 in total

Review 1.  Indoor radon and lung cancer. Estimating the risks.

Authors:  J M Samet
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-01

2.  Indoor radon--what is to be done?

Authors:  M Roach; K A Weaver
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-01

3.  Radon daughter exposures at the Radium Hill uranium mine and lung cancer rates among former workers, 1952-87.

Authors:  A Woodward; D Roder; A J McMichael; P Crouch; A Mylvaganam
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Radon risk assessment: The effect of voluntary sampling distributions and bias.

Authors:  K O Levy; M J Small
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Attributable mortality to radon exposure in Galicia, Spain. Is it necessary to act in the face of this health problem?

Authors:  Mónica Pérez-Ríos; Juan M Barros-Dios; Agustín Montes-Martínez; Alberto Ruano-Ravina
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Radon exposure in residences and lung cancer among women: combined analysis of three studies.

Authors:  J H Lubin; Z Liang; Z Hrubec; G Pershagen; J B Schoenberg; W J Blot; J B Klotz; Z Y Xu; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Lung cancer and alpha radiation.

Authors:  W Burkart
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

8.  Drinking water mutagenicity and gastrointestinal and urinary tract cancers: an ecological study in Finland.

Authors:  M Koivusalo; J J Jaakkola; T Vartiainen; T Hakulinen; S Karjalainen; E Pukkala; J Tuomisto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Canadian population risk of radon induced lung cancer: a re-assessment based on the recent cross-Canada radon survey.

Authors:  J Chen; D Moir; J Whyte
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 10.  Modifiers of exposure-response estimates for lung cancer among miners exposed to radon progeny.

Authors:  R W Hornung; J Deddens; R Roscoe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.