Catherine E Mosher1, Rebecca N Adams2, Paul R Helft3, Bert H O'Neil3, Safi Shahda3, Nicholas A Rattray4, Victoria L Champion5. 1. a Department of Psychology , Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis , Indianapolis , IN , USA. 2. b Department of Pediatrics , Stanford University School of Medicine , Palo Alto , CA , USA. 3. c Department of Medicine , Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis , IN , USA. 4. d Center for Health Information and Communication , Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center , Indianapolis , IN , USA. 5. e Department of Community and Health Systems , Indiana University School of Nursing , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed positive changes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and their family caregivers following diagnosis. We compared self-reported positive changes within patient-caregiver dyads as well as self-reports and patient reports of positive changes in caregivers. DESIGN: Individual, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 patients with advanced colorectal cancer and 23 caregivers. A theoretical thematic analysis of interview transcripts was framed by posttraumatic growth theory. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers described five positive changes: closer relationships with others, greater appreciation of life, clarifying life priorities, increased faith, and more empathy for others. Additionally, only caregivers reported better health habits following the cancer diagnosis, and a minority of patients and caregivers reported no positive changes. In about half of cases, patients reported at least one positive change that was identical to that of their caregiver. However, in most cases, patient and caregiver reports of the caregiver's positive change were discrepant. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that positive changes are a shared experience for many patient-caregiver dyads and obtaining both patient and caregiver reports of caregiver positive changes provides a more comprehensive understanding of their experience. Interventions may capitalise on positive changes to promote meaningful living in the context of advanced cancer.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed positive changes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and their family caregivers following diagnosis. We compared self-reported positive changes within patient-caregiver dyads as well as self-reports and patient reports of positive changes in caregivers. DESIGN: Individual, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 patients with advanced colorectal cancer and 23 caregivers. A theoretical thematic analysis of interview transcripts was framed by posttraumatic growth theory. RESULTS:Patients and caregivers described five positive changes: closer relationships with others, greater appreciation of life, clarifying life priorities, increased faith, and more empathy for others. Additionally, only caregivers reported better health habits following the cancer diagnosis, and a minority of patients and caregivers reported no positive changes. In about half of cases, patients reported at least one positive change that was identical to that of their caregiver. However, in most cases, patient and caregiver reports of the caregiver's positive change were discrepant. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that positive changes are a shared experience for many patient-caregiver dyads and obtaining both patient and caregiver reports of caregiver positive changes provides a more comprehensive understanding of their experience. Interventions may capitalise on positive changes to promote meaningful living in the context of advanced cancer.
Authors: M H Antoni; J M Lehman; K M Kilbourn; A E Boyers; J L Culver; S M Alferi; S E Yount; B A McGregor; P L Arena; S D Harris; A A Price; C S Carver Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Ivan Molton; Jason R Dahn; Biing-Jiun Shen; Dave Kinsinger; Lara Traeger; Scott Siegel; Neil Schneiderman; Michael Antoni Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2006-06
Authors: John M Salsman; Suzanne C Segerstrom; Emily H Brechting; Charles R Carlson; Michael A Andrykowski Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Sharon Manne; Jamie Ostroff; Gary Winkel; Lori Goldstein; Kevin Fox; Generosa Grana Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: T Em Arpawong; Steven H Richeimer; Faye Weinstein; Amany Elghamrawy; Joel E Milam Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: A J Applebaum; K L Buda; E Schofield; M Farberov; N D Teitelbaum; K Evans; R Cowens-Alvarado; R S Cannady Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Janneke van Roij; Linda Brom; Maggy Youssef-El Soud; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Natasja J H Raijmakers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.603