Literature DB >> 2777520

Different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of strabismics.

R Sireteanu1, M Fronius.   

Abstract

We tested the state of retinal correspondence at different positions in the visual field of ten observers with strabismic and/or anisometropic amblyopia, four strabismic subjects with alternating fixation and three normal controls. Correspondence was evaluated by the subjective displacement of dichoptic stimuli; to estimate the displacement, we used red-green filters, Bagolini striated glasses, polarizing filters and a phase-difference haploscope. Strabismic observers (amblyopes and alternators) frequently showed variations in the angle of anomaly (ie, the amount of shift of space coordinates in the squinting eye) between different regions of the visual field. Correspondence tended to be closer to normal in the central field and more anomalous in the periphery. These findings cannot be explained by the progressive loss of localization sensitivity with increasing eccentricity. We suggest that the different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of some strabismic observers might be due to a mechanism of selective stabilization of binocular connections in the peripheral visual field, where the larger corresponding areas overcome a limited misalignment of the eyes. In the central visual field, normal correspondence is preserved, and diplopia has to be prevented by interocular suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2777520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual evoked potentials during suppression in exotropic and esotropic strabismics: strabismic suppression objectified.

Authors:  Maurits V Joosse; Danielle L Esme; Rob J Schimsheimer; Sandra A M Verspeek; Marleen H L Vermeulen; Ellen M van Minderhout
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Recovery in microtropia: implications for aetiology and neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Cleary; C A Houston; R M McFadzean; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Spatial patterns of fixation-switch behavior in strabismic monkeys.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Stephanie K LeSage; Anand C Joshi; Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Infants' visual system nonretinotopically integrates color signals along a motion trajectory.

Authors:  Jiale Yang; Junji Watanabe; So Kanazawa; Shin'ya Nishida; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Deficits of spatial localization in children with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Maria Fronius; Ruxandra Sireteanu; Alina Zubcov
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Torsional anomalous retinal correspondence effectively expands the visual field in hemianopia.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Motion Information via the Nonfixating Eye Can Drive Optokinetic Nystagmus in Strabismus.

Authors:  Sevda Agaoglu; Mehmet N Agaoglu; Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Estimation of cortical magnification from positional error in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Carl-Magnus Svensson; Julien Besle; Ben S Webb; Brendan T Barrett; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.