David B Douglas1, John M Boone2, Emanuel Petricoin3, Lance Liotta3, Eugene Wilson4. 1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 3. Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Fort Benning, Columbus, GA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To display images of breast cancer from a dedicated breast CT using Depth 3-Dimensional (D3D) augmented reality. METHODS: A case of breast cancer imaged using contrast-enhanced breast CT (Computed Tomography) was viewed with the augmented reality imaging, which uses a head display unit (HDU) and joystick control interface. RESULTS: The augmented reality system demonstrated 3D viewing of the breast mass with head position tracking, stereoscopic depth perception, focal point convergence and the use of a 3D cursor and joy-stick enabled fly through with visualization of the spiculations extending from the breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The augmented reality system provided 3D visualization of the breast cancer with depth perception and visualization of the mass's spiculations. The augmented reality system should be further researched to determine the utility in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To display images of breast cancer from a dedicated breast CT using Depth 3-Dimensional (D3D) augmented reality. METHODS: A case of breast cancer imaged using contrast-enhanced breast CT (Computed Tomography) was viewed with the augmented reality imaging, which uses a head display unit (HDU) and joystick control interface. RESULTS: The augmented reality system demonstrated 3D viewing of the breast mass with head position tracking, stereoscopic depth perception, focal point convergence and the use of a 3D cursor and joy-stick enabled fly through with visualization of the spiculations extending from the breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The augmented reality system provided 3D visualization of the breast cancer with depth perception and visualization of the mass's spiculations. The augmented reality system should be further researched to determine the utility in clinical practice.
Authors: Elliot K Fishman; Derek R Ney; David G Heath; Frank M Corl; Karen M Horton; Pamela T Johnson Journal: Radiographics Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Peymon M Gazi; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Inneke Willekens; Elke Van de Casteele; Nico Buls; Frederik Temmermans; Bart Jansen; Rudi Deklerck; Johan de Mey Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Rita A Mukhtar; Christina Yau; Mark Rosen; Vickram J Tandon; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 5.344