| Literature DB >> 27774400 |
Xu-Bing Li1, Bin Liu1, Min Wen1, Yu-Ji Gao1, Hao-Lin Wu1, Mao-Yong Huang1, Zhi-Jun Li1, Bin Chen1, Chen-Ho Tung1, Li-Zhu Wu1.
Abstract
Solar H2 evolution of CdSe QDs can be significantly enhanced simply by introducing a suitable hole-accepting-ligand for achieving efficient hole extraction and transfer at the nanoscale interfaces, which opens an effective pathway for dissociation of excitons to generate long-lived charge separation, thus improving the solar-to-fuel conversion efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: H2 evolution; artificial photosynthesis; charge transfer; hole transfer; ligand‐modified QDs
Year: 2015 PMID: 27774400 PMCID: PMC5063123 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Photocatalytic H2 evolution of CdSe QDs: a) PTZ loading amount related H2 evolution in 2.0 h; b) H2 evolution of bare CdSe QDs, PTZ‐modified CdSe QDs (1.6 × 10−5 mol L−1) and bare PTZ (1.1 × 10−4 mol L−1) from 10.0 mL ascorbic acid aqueous solution (0.2 m) at pH 4.0 irradiated by a 500 W high pressure mercury‐lamp (≈100 mW cm−2) with a cut‐off filter to remove UV‐light at room temperature. Error bars represent mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments.
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the solar H2 evolution of CdSe QDs in the presence and absence of hole‐accepting ligands (HAL) and the corresponding interfacial charge transfer processes.
Figure 2PEC measurements: a) transient photocurrent responses to chopped visible‐light irradiation of NiO electrode (cyan line), bare CdSe QDs electrode (blue line) and PTZ‐modified CdSe QDs electrode (pink line); b) IPCE spectra of bare CdSe QDs electrode (blue line) and PTZ‐modified CdSe QDs electrode (pink line). Error bars represent mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments.
Figure 3a) Time courses of H2 evolution in the three‐electrode system by taking bare CdSe QDs electrode and PTZ‐modified CdSe QDs electrode as the working electrode, respectively; b) long time J–t curve in 20.0 h test; c) EPR signal obtained from the three‐electrode PEC system by using 0.02 m DMPO as a trapping agent under visible‐light irradiation (λ > 400 nm) and −0.1 V versus NHE for 1.5 h.
Figure 4Transient photocurrent responses of CdSe QD‐sensitized photocathodes modified by PTZ derivatives: a) phenothiazine‐10‐carbonyl chloride, b) 10‐propionylphenothiazine, c) phenothiazine, and d) 10‐methylphenothiazine. Error bars represent mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments.