Literature DB >> 27773707

Moving targets: Promoting physical activity in public spaces via open streets in the US.

J Aaron Hipp1, Alyssa Bird2, Margaret van Bakergem3, Elizabeth Yarnall4.   

Abstract

Popularity of Open Streets, temporarily opening streets to communities and closing streets to vehicles, in the US has recently surged. As of January 2016, 122 cities have hosted an Open Streets program. Even with this great expansion, the sustainability of Open Streets remains a challenge in many cities and overall Open Streets in the US differ from their successful counterparts in Central and South America. Between summer 2015 and winter 2016, we reviewed the websites and social media of the 122 identified programs and interviewed 32 unique Open Streets programs. Websites and social media were reviewed for program initiation, number of Open Streets days, length of routes, duration of program, and reported participation. Interview questions focused on barriers and facilitators of expanding Open Streets and specific questioning regarding local evaluation activities. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with constant comparative methodology. Over three-quarters of US Open Streets programs have been initiated since 2010, with median frequency of one time per year, 4h per date, and 5000-9999 participants. Seventy-seven percent of program routes are under 5km in length. Success of programs was measured by enthusiasm, attendance, social media, survey metrics, and sustainability. Thirteen of 32 program organizers expressed interest in expanding their programs to 12 dates per year, but noted consistent barriers to expansion including funding, permitting, and branding. Though many cities now host Open Streets programs, their ability to effect public health remains limited with few program dates per year. Coordinated efforts, especially around funding, permitting, and branding may assist in expanding program dates.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciclovia; Community-based programs; Open streets; Physical activity; Public space

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27773707     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  8 in total

1.  Talking the Walk: Perceptions of Neighborhood Characteristics from Users of Open Streets Programs in Latin America and the USA.

Authors:  Susan G Zieff; Elaine A Musselman; Olga L Sarmiento; Silvia A Gonzalez; Nicolas Aguilar-Farias; Sandra J Winter; J Aaron Hipp; Karoll Quijano; Abby C King
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices Towards Clean Air and Active Transportation.

Authors:  Andrew Glazener; Haneen Khreis
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-03

3.  Comparing bicyclists who use smartphone apps to record rides with those who do not: implications for representativeness and selection bias.

Authors:  Michael D Garber; Kari E Watkins; Michael R Kramer
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2019-10-25

4.  Use of an Elevated Avenue for Leisure-Time Physical Activity by Adults from Downtown São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Eduardo Quieroti Rodrigues; Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia; Evelyn Helena Corgosinho Ribeiro; Ligia Vizeu Barrozo; Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal; Douglas Roque Andrade; João Paulo Dos Anjos Souza Barbosa; Ana Paula de Oliveira Barbosa Nunes; Rogério César Fermino; Alex Antonio Florindo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Geographic Distribution of the Ciclovia and Recreovia Programs by Neighborhood SES in Bogotá: How Unequal is the Geographic Access Assessed Via Distance-based Measures?

Authors:  Diana C Parra; Deepti Adlakha; Jose D Pinzon; Alexandria Van Zandt; Ross C Brownson; Luis F Gomez
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Participation and engagement of a rural community in Ciclovía: progressing from research intervention to community adoption.

Authors:  Linda K Ko; Eligio Jimenez; Oralia Cisneros; Emily V R Brown; Genoveva Ibarra; Sonia Bishop; Monica Escareño; Luis Serrano-Rubio; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Jason A Mendoza; Sarah Sutton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Exploring public values through Twitter data associated with urban parks pre- and post- COVID-19.

Authors:  Jing-Huei Huang; Myron F Floyd; Laura G Tateosian; J Aaron Hipp
Journal:  Landsc Urban Plan       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 8.119

8.  An Evaluation of a Kansas Open Streets Event's Impact on Businesses.

Authors:  Danielle Gauna; Jack Brown; Kelsey Lu; Matthew Martinez; Elizabeth Ablah
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.