Lasse Skibsbye1, Thomas Jespersen1, Torsten Christ2, Mary M Maleckar3, Jonas van den Brink3, Pasi Tavi4, Jussi T Koivumäki5. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Department of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; DZ HK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck,Germany. 3. Center for Cardiological Innovation and Center for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway. 4. Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 5. Center for Cardiological Innovation and Center for Biomedical Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway; Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Electronic address: jussi.koivumaki@iki.fi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Refractoriness of cardiac cells limits maximum frequency of electrical activity and protects the heart from tonic contractions. Short refractory periods support major arrhythmogenic substrates and augmentation of refractoriness is therefore seen as a main mechanism of antiarrhythmic drugs. Cardiomyocyte excitability depends on availability of sodium channels, which involves both time- and voltage-dependent recovery from inactivation. This study therefore aims to characterise how sodium channel inactivation affects refractoriness in human atria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Steady-state activation and inactivation parameters of sodium channels measured in vitro in isolated human atrial cardiomyocytes were used to parameterise a mathematical human atrial cell model. Action potential data were acquired from human atrial trabeculae of patients in either sinus rhythm or chronic atrial fibrillation. The ex vivo measurements of action potential duration, effective refractory period and resting membrane potential were well-replicated in simulations using this new in silico model. Notably, the voltage threshold potential at which refractoriness was observed was not different between sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation tissues and was neither affected by changes in frequency (1 vs. 3Hz). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a preferentially voltage-dependent, rather than time-dependent, effect with respect to refractoriness at physiologically relevant rates in human atria. However, as the resting membrane potential is hyperpolarized in chronic atrial fibrillation, the voltage-dependence of excitability dominates, profoundly increasing the risk for arrhythmia re-initiation and maintenance in fibrillating atria. Our results thereby highlight resting membrane potential as a potential target in pharmacological management of chronic atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Refractoriness of cardiac cells limits maximum frequency of electrical activity and protects the heart from tonic contractions. Short refractory periods support major arrhythmogenic substrates and augmentation of refractoriness is therefore seen as a main mechanism of antiarrhythmic drugs. Cardiomyocyte excitability depends on availability of sodium channels, which involves both time- and voltage-dependent recovery from inactivation. This study therefore aims to characterise how sodium channel inactivation affects refractoriness in human atria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Steady-state activation and inactivation parameters of sodium channels measured in vitro in isolated human atrial cardiomyocytes were used to parameterise a mathematical human atrial cell model. Action potential data were acquired from human atrial trabeculae of patients in either sinus rhythm or chronic atrial fibrillation. The ex vivo measurements of action potential duration, effective refractory period and resting membrane potential were well-replicated in simulations using this new in silico model. Notably, the voltage threshold potential at which refractoriness was observed was not different between sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation tissues and was neither affected by changes in frequency (1 vs. 3Hz). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a preferentially voltage-dependent, rather than time-dependent, effect with respect to refractoriness at physiologically relevant rates in human atria. However, as the resting membrane potential is hyperpolarized in chronic atrial fibrillation, the voltage-dependence of excitability dominates, profoundly increasing the risk for arrhythmia re-initiation and maintenance in fibrillating atria. Our results thereby highlight resting membrane potential as a potential target in pharmacological management of chronic atrial fibrillation.
Authors: Haibo Ni; Alex Fogli Iseppe; Wayne R Giles; Sanjiv M Narayan; Henggui Zhang; Andrew G Edwards; Stefano Morotti; Eleonora Grandi Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Jussi T Koivumäki; Nikolay Naumenko; Tomi Tuomainen; Jouni Takalo; Minna Oksanen; Katja A Puttonen; Šárka Lehtonen; Johanna Kuusisto; Markku Laakso; Jari Koistinaho; Pasi Tavi Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Marta Lemme; Bärbel M Ulmer; Marc D Lemoine; Antonia T L Zech; Frederik Flenner; Ursula Ravens; Hermann Reichenspurner; Miriam Rol-Garcia; Godfrey Smith; Arne Hansen; Torsten Christ; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Márcia Vagos; Ilsbeth G M van Herck; Joakim Sundnes; Hermenegild J Arevalo; Andrew G Edwards; Jussi T Koivumäki Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Angelo Auricchio; Tardu Özkartal; Francesca Salghetti; Laura Neumann; Simone Pezzuto; Ali Gharaviri; Andrea Demarchi; Maria Luce Caputo; François Regoli; Carlo De Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Pedro Brugada; Catherine Klersy; Tiziano Moccetti; Ulrich Schotten; Giulio Conte Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jorge Sánchez; Giorgio Luongo; Mark Nothstein; Laura A Unger; Javier Saiz; Beatriz Trenor; Armin Luik; Olaf Dössel; Axel Loewe Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 4.566