Literature DB >> 27773563

Evolution of the Arden Syntax: Key Technical Issues from the Standards Development Organization Perspective.

Robert A Jenders1, Klaus-Peter Adlassnig2, Karsten Fehre3, Peter Haug4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial version of the Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Systems was created to facilitate explicit representation of medical logic in a form that could be easily composed and interpreted by clinical experts in order to facilitate clinical decision support (CDS). Because of demand from knowledge engineers and programmers to improve functionality related to complex use cases, the Arden Syntax evolved to include features typical of general programming languages but that were specialized to meet the needs of the clinical decision support environment, including integration into a clinical information system architecture.
METHOD: Review of the design history and evolution of the Arden Syntax by workers who participated in this evolution from the perspective of the standards development organization (SDO).
RESULTS: In order to meet user needs, a variety of features were successively incorporated in Arden Syntax. These can be grouped in several classes of change, including control flow, data structures, operators and external links. These changes included expansion of operators to manipulate lists and strings; a formalism for structured output; iteration constructs; user-defined objects and operators to manipulate them; features to support international use and output in different natural languages; additional control features; fuzzy logic formalisms; and mapping of the entire syntax to XML. The history and rationale of this evolution are summarized.
CONCLUSION: In response to user demand and to reflect its growing role in clinical decision support, the Arden Syntax has evolved to include a number of powerful features. These depart somewhat from the original vision of the syntax as simple and easily understandable but from the SDO perspective increase the utility of this standard for implementation of CDS. Backwards compatibility has been maintained, allowing continued support of the earlier, simpler decision support models.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arden Syntax; Clinical decision support; HL7 International

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27773563      PMCID: PMC6193856          DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  11 in total

1.  Challenges in implementing a knowledge editor for the Arden Syntax: knowledge base maintenance and standardization of database linkages.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders; Balendu Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Making the standard more standard: a data and query model for knowledge representation in the Arden syntax.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders; Roger Corman; Balendu Dasgupta
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Executing medical logic modules expressed in ArdenML using Drools.

Authors:  Chai Young Jung; Katherine A Sward; Peter J Haug
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Fuzzy Arden Syntax: A fuzzy programming language for medicine.

Authors:  Thomas Vetterlein; Harald Mandl; Klaus-Peter Adlassnig
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Utility of Arden Syntax for Representation of Fuzzy Logic in Clinical Quality Measures.

Authors:  Robert A Jenders
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

6.  Evolution of a knowledge base for a clinical decision support system encoded in the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  R A Jenders; H Huang; G Hripcsak; P D Clayton
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

7.  Assessment of a knowledge-acquisition tool for writing Medical Logic Modules in the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  R A Jenders; B Dasgupta
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

8.  Medical decision support: experience with implementing the Arden Syntax at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center.

Authors:  R A Jenders; G Hripcsak; R V Sideli; W DuMouchel; H Zhang; J J Cimino; S B Johnson; E H Sherman; P D Clayton
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

9.  Using intermediate states to improve the ability of the Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge.

Authors:  E H Sherman; G Hripcsak; J Starren; R A Jenders; P Clayton
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

Review 10.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; P Ludemann; T A Pryor; O B Wigertz; P D Clayton
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1994-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Mapping the Entire Record-An Alternative Approach to Data Access from Medical Logic Modules.

Authors:  Stefan Kraus; Dennis Toddenroth; Martin Staudigel; Wolfgang Rödle; Philipp Unberath; Lena Griebel; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Sebastian Mate
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016.

Authors:  R A Jenders
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 3.  Contemporary clinical decision support standards using Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources.

Authors:  Howard R Strasberg; Bryn Rhodes; Guilherme Del Fiol; Robert A Jenders; Peter J Haug; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  A Comparison of Arden Syntax and Clinical Quality Language as Knowledge Representation Formalisms for Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Andrey Soares; Robert A Jenders; Robert Harrison; Lisa M Schilling
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  The use of computer-interpretable clinical guidelines to manage care complexities of patients with multimorbid conditions: A review.

Authors:  Eda Bilici; George Despotou; Theodoros N Arvanitis
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2018-10-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.