Britta Wigginton1, Coral Gartner2, Ingrid J Rowlands2. 1. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia. Electronic address: b.wigginton@uq.edu.au. 2. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, or vaping, is increasing against a backdrop of declining smoking rates. E-cigarettes contain fewer toxicants than cigarettes, but their appearance and mode of use has the potential to satisfy the habitual aspects of smoking. To date, we know little about lay perceptions of the safety of using e-cigarettes in pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a thematic discourse analysis of 13 online discussion forum threads that discussed e-cigarette use during pregnancy. We focused on the major discursive strategies that forum posters used to debate the safety of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. RESULTS: We identified three distinct ways in which forum posters debated the safety of using e-cigarettes during pregnancy: 1) quitting (nicotine) cold turkey is unsafe, 2) vaping is the lesser of two evils, and 3) vaping is not worth the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Discussions about the safety of e-cigarettes drew on the premise that 1) immediate cessation of nicotine was potentially harmful and unsafe, 2) e-cigarettes were a harm reduction tool, or 3) vaping could be dangerous and should be avoided. Although these arguments are not necessarily specific to pregnancy (beside mentions of fetal-specific risks), this analysis points to the need to educate and support women about harm reduction options. IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should be aware that some women may be currently using or considering using e-cigarettes in an effort to quit or reduce smoking. It is important that health professionals are equipped to educate women with accurate, up-to-date, and balanced information about the risks and benefits of e-cigarette use during pregnancy.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, or vaping, is increasing against a backdrop of declining smoking rates. E-cigarettes contain fewer toxicants than cigarettes, but their appearance and mode of use has the potential to satisfy the habitual aspects of smoking. To date, we know little about lay perceptions of the safety of using e-cigarettes in pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a thematic discourse analysis of 13 online discussion forum threads that discussed e-cigarette use during pregnancy. We focused on the major discursive strategies that forum posters used to debate the safety of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. RESULTS: We identified three distinct ways in which forum posters debated the safety of using e-cigarettes during pregnancy: 1) quitting (nicotine) cold turkey is unsafe, 2) vaping is the lesser of two evils, and 3) vaping is not worth the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Discussions about the safety of e-cigarettes drew on the premise that 1) immediate cessation of nicotine was potentially harmful and unsafe, 2) e-cigarettes were a harm reduction tool, or 3) vaping could be dangerous and should be avoided. Although these arguments are not necessarily specific to pregnancy (beside mentions of fetal-specific risks), this analysis points to the need to educate and support women about harm reduction options. IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should be aware that some women may be currently using or considering using e-cigarettes in an effort to quit or reduce smoking. It is important that health professionals are equipped to educate women with accurate, up-to-date, and balanced information about the risks and benefits of e-cigarette use during pregnancy.
Authors: Elise E DeVito; Tessa Fagle; Alicia M Allen; Raina D Pang; Nicole Petersen; Philip H Smith; Andrea H Weinberger Journal: Curr Addict Rep Date: 2021-07-21
Authors: L G Rollins; Natasha A Sokol; Meaghan McCallum; Lucinda England; Kristen Matteson; Erika Werner; Laura R Stroud Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sarah F Maloney; Eric K Soule; Sherilyn Palafox; Keaton McFadden; Mignonne C Guy; Thomas Eissenberg; Pebbles Fagan Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 4.591
Authors: Katarzyna Campbell; Thomas Coleman-Haynes; Katharine Bowker; Sue E Cooper; Sarah Connelly; Tim Coleman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-22
Authors: Ratika Sharma; Britta Wigginton; Carla Meurk; Pauline Ford; Coral E Gartner Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 3.390