N Y Choi1, E H Kim1, C H Baek1, I Sohn2, S Yeon2, M K Chung3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: chungmk@skku.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop nomogram for prediction of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing ablative and reconstruction surgery for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Total 341 patients were retrospectively analyzed, and clinical variables in preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods were compared between delirium group (n = 89) and non-delirium group (n = 252). Multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to generate and test a nomogram, which performance was evaluated by 10-fold cross validation (CV) procedure. RESULTS: In univariate and multivariate analysis, age, history of psychiatric disorder, marital status, preoperative numeric rating scale for pain, ASA classification, and ICU stay period were identified as significant risk factors. Using these factors, nomogram for predicting the POD was developed and it showed sensitivity of 61.8%, specificity of 75.4%, PPV of 47.0%, and NPV of 84.8% (Youden's index of 0.372). In 10-fold cross validation set, corresponding values were 44.9%, 84.1%, 50.0% and 81.2% (Youden's index of 0.337). AUC was comparable between two sets (0.7407 and 0.6898). CONCLUSIONS: Proposed nomogram showed fair discriminative power for POD risk in head and neck cancer patients undergoing major surgery.
PURPOSE: To develop nomogram for prediction of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing ablative and reconstruction surgery for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Total 341 patients were retrospectively analyzed, and clinical variables in preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods were compared between delirium group (n = 89) and non-delirium group (n = 252). Multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to generate and test a nomogram, which performance was evaluated by 10-fold cross validation (CV) procedure. RESULTS: In univariate and multivariate analysis, age, history of psychiatric disorder, marital status, preoperative numeric rating scale for pain, ASA classification, and ICU stay period were identified as significant risk factors. Using these factors, nomogram for predicting the POD was developed and it showed sensitivity of 61.8%, specificity of 75.4%, PPV of 47.0%, and NPV of 84.8% (Youden's index of 0.372). In 10-fold cross validation set, corresponding values were 44.9%, 84.1%, 50.0% and 81.2% (Youden's index of 0.337). AUC was comparable between two sets (0.7407 and 0.6898). CONCLUSIONS: Proposed nomogram showed fair discriminative power for POD risk in head and neck cancerpatients undergoing major surgery.
Authors: Gizat M Kassie; Tuan A Nguyen; Lisa M Kalisch Ellett; Nicole L Pratt; Elizabeth E Roughead Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Jeong Heon Kim; Yoon Se Lee; Yong Han Kim; Ki Ju Cho; Young Ho Jung; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-04-07
Authors: Jaron Densky; Antoine Eskander; Stephen Kang; Jon Chan; Ben Tweel; Jigar Sitapara; Enver Ozer; Amit Agrawal; Ricardo Carrau; James Rocco; Ted N Teknos; Matthew Old Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Elizabeth L Whitlock; Matthias R Braehler; Jennifer A Kaplan; Emily Finlayson; Stephanie E Rogers; Vanja Douglas; Anne L Donovan Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 6.627