Literature DB >> 27773456

Clinical hemodynamic evaluation of patients implanted with a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (HeartMate 3).

Nir Uriel1, Sirtaz Adatya2, Jiří Malý3, Eric Kruse2, Daniel Rodgers2, Gerald Heatley4, Aleš Herman3, Poornima Sood4, Dominik Berliner5, Johann Bauersachs5, Axel Haverich5, Michael Želízko3, Jan D Schmitto5, Ivan Netuka3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) is a Conformiteé Européenne (CE) mark-approved left ventricular assist device (LVAD) with a fully magnetically levitated rotor with features consisting of a wide range of operational speeds, wide flow paths and an artificial pulse. We performed a hemodynamic and echocardiographic evaluation of patients implanted with the HM3 LVAD to assess the speed range for optimal hemodynamic support.
METHODS: Sixteen HM3 patients underwent pump speed ramp tests with right heart catheterization (including central venous pressure [CVP], pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] and blood pressure [BP]) and 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Data were recorded at up to 13 speed settings. Speed changes were in steps of 100 revolutions per minute (rpm), starting at 4,600 rpm and ramping up to 6,200 rpm.
RESULTS: Mean original speed was 5,306 ± 148 rpm, with a majority of patients (10 of 16, 62.5%) having normal CVPs and PCWPs at their original rpm settings. Going from lowest to highest speeds, cardiac output improved at the rate of 0.08 ± 0.08 liter/min per 100 rpm (total change 1.25 ± 1.20 liters/min) and PCWP decreased at the rate of -0.48 ± 0.27 mm Hg per 100 rpm (total change -6.13 ± 3.72 mm Hg). CVP and systolic BP did not change significantly with changes in rpm. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) decreased at a rate of -0.15 ± 0.09 cm per 100 rpm. Number of rpm was adjusted based on test results to achieve CVPs and PCWPs as close to normal limits as possible, which was feasible in 13 (81.3%) patients. For the remaining 3 patients, medical management was pursued to optimize hemodynamic support.
CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic normalization of pressures was achieved in the majority of patients implanted with the HM3 pump within a narrow speed range.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  device optimization; hemodynamic evaluation; left ventricular assist device; magnetic levitation; ramp test

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27773456     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  The momentum of HeartMate 3: a novel active magnetically levitated centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

Authors:  Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Jasmin S Hanke; Marcel Ricklefs; Malakh Shrestha; Guenes Dogan; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Effects of pump speed changes on exercise capacity in patients supported with a left ventricular assist device-an overview.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Nils Reiss
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 5.  How to Optimize Patient Selection and Device Performance of the Newest Generation Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Chonyang L Albert; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-08-07

6.  Echocardiographic Predictors of Hemodynamics in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Jonathan Grinstein; Teruhiko Imamura; Eric Kruse; Sara Kalantari; Daniel Rodgers; Sirtaz Adatya; Gabriel Sayer; Gene H Kim; Nitasha Sarswat; Jayant Raihkelkar; Takeyoshi Ota; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Daniel Burkhoff; Roberto Lang; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 7.  Hemodynamic Pump-Patient Interactions and Left Ventricular Assist Device Imaging.

Authors:  Nikhil Narang; Jayant Raikhelkar; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.213

8.  Heartmate 3 fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device for the treatment of advanced heart failure -1 year results from the Ce mark trial.

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Ivan Netuka; Jan D Schmitto; Daniel Zimpfer; Jens Garbade; Vivek Rao; Michiel Morshuis; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Silvana Marasco; Laura Damme; Yuriy Pya
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Optimal haemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced haemocompatibility-related adverse events.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ann Nguyen; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Nitasha Sarswat; Sara Kalantari; Bryan Smith; Colleen Juricek; Daniel Rodgers; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 17.349

Review 10.  Facilitating noncardiac surgery for the patient with left ventricular assist device: A guide for the anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Kai-Yin Hwang; Nian-Chih Hwang
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.