Yuan Liu1, Monica Vela2, Tanya Rudakevych3, Christopher Wigfield4, Edward Garrity4, Milda R Saunders5. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 2. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Lung Transplant Program, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address: msaunders@uchicago.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) has prioritized patient benefit and post-transplant survival, reducing waitlist to transplant time to <200 days and decreasing mortality on the waitlist. A current challenge is the wait for the waitlist-the time between the patient's transplant-eligible diagnosis and waitlist registration. METHODS: We investigated whether sociodemographic (age, sex, race, insurance, marital status, median household income) and clinical (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] percent of predicted, body mass index, depression/anxiety, alcohol/substance misuse, absolute/relative contraindications) factors influenced referral and waitlist registration. We conducted a retrospective cohort study through chart review of hospitalized patients on the University of Chicago general medicine service from 2006 to 2014 who met transplant-eligible criteria and ICD-9 billing codes for cystic fibrosis (CF) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). We analyzed the times from transplant eligibility to referral, work-up and waitlisting using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Overall, the referral rate for transplant-eligible patients was 64%. Of those referred, approximately 36% reach the lung transplant waitlist. Referred CF patients were significantly more likely to reach the transplant waitlist than PF patients (CF 60% vs PF 22%, p < 0.05). In addition, CF patients had a shorter wait from transplant eligibility to waitlist than PF patients (329 vs 2,369 days, respectively [25th percentile], p < 0.05). Patients with PF and CF both faced delays from eligibility to referral and waitlist. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts are needed to better identify and refer appropriate patients for lung transplant evaluation. Targeted interventions may facilitate more efficient evaluation completion and waitlist appearance. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) has prioritized patient benefit and post-transplant survival, reducing waitlist to transplant time to <200 days and decreasing mortality on the waitlist. A current challenge is the wait for the waitlist-the time between the patient's transplant-eligible diagnosis and waitlist registration. METHODS: We investigated whether sociodemographic (age, sex, race, insurance, marital status, median household income) and clinical (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] percent of predicted, body mass index, depression/anxiety, alcohol/substance misuse, absolute/relative contraindications) factors influenced referral and waitlist registration. We conducted a retrospective cohort study through chart review of hospitalized patients on the University of Chicago general medicine service from 2006 to 2014 who met transplant-eligible criteria and ICD-9 billing codes for cystic fibrosis (CF) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). We analyzed the times from transplant eligibility to referral, work-up and waitlisting using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Overall, the referral rate for transplant-eligible patients was 64%. Of those referred, approximately 36% reach the lung transplant waitlist. Referred CFpatients were significantly more likely to reach the transplant waitlist than PF patients (CF 60% vs PF 22%, p < 0.05). In addition, CFpatients had a shorter wait from transplant eligibility to waitlist than PF patients (329 vs 2,369 days, respectively [25th percentile], p < 0.05). Patients with PF and CF both faced delays from eligibility to referral and waitlist. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts are needed to better identify and refer appropriate patients for lung transplant evaluation. Targeted interventions may facilitate more efficient evaluation completion and waitlist appearance. Copyright Â
Authors: Jonathan B Orens; Marc Estenne; Selim Arcasoy; John V Conte; Paul Corris; Jim J Egan; Thomas Egan; Shaf Keshavjee; Christiane Knoop; Robert Kotloff; Fernando J Martinez; Steven Nathan; Scott Palmer; Alec Patterson; Lianne Singer; Gregory Snell; Sean Studer; J L Vachiery; Allan R Glanville Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: David Meltzer; Willard G Manning; Jeanette Morrison; Manish N Shah; Lei Jin; Todd Guth; Wendy Levinson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-12-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joseph P Lynch; Rajan Saggar; S Sam Weigt; David J Ross; John A Belperio Journal: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: Ivette Cruz; Kristen K Marciel; Alexandra L Quittner; Michael S Schechter Journal: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: Cheryl R Clark; Leroi S Hicks; Joseph H Keogh; Arnold M Epstein; John Z Ayanian Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Aasthaa Bansal; Patrick J Heagerty; Lurdes Y T Inoue; David L Veenstra; Charles J Wolock; Anirban Basu Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2021-11-07 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Patricia J Rodriguez; David L Veenstra; Patrick J Heagerty; Christopher H Goss; Kathleen J Ramos; Aasthaa Bansal Journal: Value Health Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 5.101