Yan Xu1, Qian Wang2, Hai-Tao Ren1, Lin Qiao2, Yao Zhang1, Yun-Yun Fei2, Yan Zhao2, Li-Ying Cui3. 1. Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Neuroscience Center of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, PR China. Electronic address: pumchcuily@sina.com.
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort analysis of relapses, disability, and adverse events in NMOSD patients treated with AZA, MMF, or CTX (n=119, 38, and 41, respectively). All the patients were co-treated with oral prednisone. RESULTS: A significant reduction in relapse rate was found in patients taking AZA (p<0.001), MMF (p<0.001) or CTX (p=0.01). MMF was associated with a lower risk of relapse than AZA, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08). AZA and MMF decreased the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores significantly (AZA: p=0.02; MMF: p=0.01), whereas CTX did not. Compared with AZA, MMF had a significantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events (p=0.02), whereas CTX had a comparable risk (p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: MMF is a good first-line treatment option for NMOSD and AZA remains a valuable first-line drug if its side effects are tolerable while CTX can be a treatment option for patients who cannot tolerate AZA and MMF.
AIMS: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort analysis of relapses, disability, and adverse events in NMOSD patients treated with AZA, MMF, or CTX (n=119, 38, and 41, respectively). All the patients were co-treated with oral prednisone. RESULTS: A significant reduction in relapse rate was found in patients taking AZA (p<0.001), MMF (p<0.001) or CTX (p=0.01). MMF was associated with a lower risk of relapse than AZA, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.08). AZA and MMF decreased the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores significantly (AZA: p=0.02; MMF: p=0.01), whereas CTX did not. Compared with AZA, MMF had a significantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events (p=0.02), whereas CTX had a comparable risk (p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS:MMF is a good first-line treatment option for NMOSD and AZA remains a valuable first-line drug if its side effects are tolerable while CTX can be a treatment option for patients who cannot tolerate AZA and MMF.