Literature DB >> 27772556

Psychometric analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Danish patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (The DEFIB-WOMEN study).

Susanne S Pedersen1, Kim Mathiasen2, Karl Bang Christensen3, Guido Makransky4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a measure of depressive symptoms, in a large Danish national cohort of patients with heart disease, implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), using item response theory.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients implanted with an ICD (n=1531; 80.4% men) completed the PHQ-9 at the time of implant. Data were analyzed using two item response theory models, the partial credit model and the generalized partial credit model.
RESULTS: The analysis showed disordered response thresholds in eight of nine items for the partial credit model and five of nine items for the generalized partial credit model, indicating that respondents have difficulty discriminating between response options. When collapsing response options 2 and 3, the rescored PHQ-9 had a better fit to both models. The unidimensionality and the precision of the rescored PHQ-9 were confirmed. Items did not have any differential functioning (DIF) across educational level, age, indication for ICD implantation, and severity of heart failure that influence depression outcomes in patients with an ICD. One item exhibited DIF by gender. Three items did not fit the partial credit model, but the generalized partial credit model could be fitted to the full item set.
CONCLUSION: The unidimensionality and reliability of the Danish version of the PHQ-9 were confirmed. However, the associated consequences of the number of response options (3-point versus 4-point Likert scale) need to be further examined for the PHQ-9 both as a screening tool and outcome measure.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depressive symptoms; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Item response theory (IRT); Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27772556     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  5 in total

1.  The severity of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Theresa A Morgan; Kasey Stanton
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Are we accurately evaluating depression in patients with cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca M Saracino; Ezgi Aytürk; Heining Cham; Barry Rosenfeld; Leah M Feuerstahler; Christian J Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-08-08

3.  Cannabis use among Danish patients with cancer: a cross-sectional survey of sociodemographic traits, quality of life, and patient experiences.

Authors:  Sebastian W Nielsen; Christina H Ruhlmann; Lise Eckhoff; Dorthe Brønnum; Jørn Herrstedt; Susanne O Dalton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Using the Multidimensional Model of Acceptance to Investigate How Different Facets of Acceptance are Related to Quality of Life Following Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Anders Aaby; Sophie Lykkegard Ravn; Helge Kasch; Tonny Elmose Andersen
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adult Depression and Anxiety in Routine Secondary Care: Observational Study.

Authors:  Kim Mathiasen; Heleen Riper; Tonny E Andersen; Kirsten K Roessler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.