Literature DB >> 27771985

Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.

André Lamy1, P J Devereaux1, Dorairaj Prabhakaran1, David P Taggart1, Shengshou Hu1, Zbynek Straka1, Leopoldo S Piegas1, Alvaro Avezum1, Ahmet R Akar1, Fernando Lanas Zanetti1, Anil R Jain1, Nicolas Noiseux1, Chandrasekar Padmanabhan1, Juan-Carlos Bahamondes1, Richard J Novick1, Liang Tao1, Pablo A Olavegogeascoechea1, Balram Airan1, Toomas-Andres Sulling1, Richard P Whitlock1, Yongning Ou1, Peggy Gao1, Shirley Pettit1, Salim Yusuf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that there was no significant difference at 30 days or at 1 year in the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure between patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed with a beating-heart technique (off-pump) and those who underwent CABG performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump). We now report the results at 5 years (the end of the trial).
METHODS: A total of 4752 patients (from 19 countries) who had coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo off-pump or on-pump CABG. For this report, we analyzed a composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, or repeat coronary revascularization (either CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention). The mean follow-up period was 4.8 years.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the off-pump group and the on-pump group in the rate of the composite outcome (23.1% and 23.6%, respectively; hazard ratio with off-pump CABG, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.10; P=0.72) or in the rates of the components of the outcome, including repeat coronary revascularization, which was performed in 2.8% of the patients in the off-pump group and in 2.3% of the patients in the on-pump group (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.73; P=0.29). The secondary outcome for the overall period of the trial - the mean cost in U.S. dollars per patient - also did not differ significantly between the off-pump group and the on-pump group ($15,107 and $14,992, respectively; between-group difference, $115; 95% CI, -$697 to $927). There were no significant between-group differences in quality-of-life measures.
CONCLUSIONS: In our trial, the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, or repeat revascularization at 5 years of follow-up was similar among patients who underwent off-pump CABG and those who underwent on-pump CABG. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; CORONARY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00463294 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27771985     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  61 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Yasin Essa; Khalil Jacoub; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  On vs. off pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the next chapter.

Authors:  Nicola King
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

3.  Coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump or on-pump: another brick in the wall.

Authors:  Antonio M Calafiore; Sotirios Prapas; Ahmed Osman; Michele Di Mauro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Steffen Bargenda; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Dual inflow, total-arterial, anaortic, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: how to do it.

Authors:  Fabio Ramponi; Michael Seco; James B Edelman; Andrew G Sherrah; Paul G Bannon; R John L Brereton; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

6.  Postoperative complications after elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Maria Tafelmeier; Teresa Weizenegger; Sarah Ripfel; Miriam Fauser; Bernhard Floerchinger; Daniele Camboni; York Zausig; Sigrid Wittmann; Marzena A Drzymalski; Florian Zeman; Christof Schmid; Lars S Maier; Stefan Wagner; Michael Arzt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Off-pump versus on-pump bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease (EXCEL study) - is experience the unknown variable?

Authors:  Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-02

8.  Is there a long-term survival benefit with on pump coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Nicola King
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

9.  Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.

Authors:  David R McIlroy; Marcos G Lopez; Frederic T Billings
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.299

10.  On-Pump Beating/Non-Beating CABG in Stable Angina Have Similar Outcomes.

Authors:  Victor Dayan; Juan Jose Paganini; Alvaro Marichal; Daniel Brusich
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.