Literature DB >> 27771670

Discussion: The Heart of the Paper.

Arvind Bagga1.   

Abstract

The discussion section explains the meaning of results to the readers, and addresses the implications of the findings emanating from the particular study. Authors should compare their results with previous reports, and attempt to explain similarities and differences. It is useful to outline the limitations and strengths of the study, and suggest a future line of work. A concise, convincing and meticulous discussion with scholarly referencing is the key to a lasting impression.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27771670     DOI: 10.1007/s13312-016-0955-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   1.411


  2 in total

1.  Limited by our limitations.

Authors:  Paula T Ross; Nikki L Bibler Zaidi
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

Review 2.  The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion.

Authors:  Asghar Ghasemi; Zahra Bahadoran; Parvin Mirmiran; Farhad Hosseinpanah; Niloofar Shiva; Azita Zadeh-Vakili
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-07-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.