Literature DB >> 27770488

State of the Science: Tools and Measurement for Shared Decision Making.

Karen R Sepucha1, Maggie Breslin2,3, Charles Graffeo4, Christopher R Carpenter5, Erik P Hess2,6,7.   

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) has been advocated as an approach to selecting medical tests and treatments for many situations. The goal of SDM is to ensure that patients are well informed, are meaningfully involved in decisions, and receive treatments that meet their goals and preferences. There is considerable evidence about the tools used to promote SDM, called patient decision aids, and many different measures have been developed to assess the impact of SDM. However, fairly little is known about the applicability of the tools and measures in the emergency department (ED) setting. This article builds on insights from two keynote lectures presented at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference discussing the state of the science for measurement of SDM and the design of patient decision aids to promote SDM conversations and highlights some key areas for further research to advance SDM in the ED.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770488     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  7 in total

1.  The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda May 10, 2016, New Orleans, LA.

Authors:  Corita R Grudzen; Jana R Anderson; Christopher R Carpenter; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Development of the CIDSS2 Score for Children with Mild Head Trauma without Intracranial Injury.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Yan Yan; Christopher R Carpenter; Angela Lumba-Brown; Martin S Keller; Jose A Pineda; Ross C Brownson; David D Limbrick
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Does Shared Decision Making Actually Occur in the Emergency Department? Looking at It from the Patients' Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Marc A Probst; Denise D Quigley; Peter St Marie; Nikita Nayyar; Sarah H Sabbagh; Tanesha Beckford; Hemal K Kanzaria
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  G E Collée; B J van der Wilk; J J B van Lanschot; J J Busschbach; L Timmermans; S M Lagarde; L W Kranenburg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Shared Decision Making Enhances Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in Adult Patients in Outpatient Care.

Authors:  Flora Kuehne; Linda Sanftenberg; Tobias Dreischulte; Jochen Gensichen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Use of an iPad App (Aid for Decision-making in Occupational Choice) for Collaborative Goal Setting in Interprofessional Rehabilitation: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Carla Strubbia; William Mm Levack; Rebecca Grainger; Kayoko Takahashi; Kounosuke Tomori
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-11-18

Review 7.  Diagnosing COVID-19 in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review of Clinical Examinations, Laboratory Tests, Imaging Accuracy, and Biases.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Philip A Mudd; Colin P West; Erin Wilber; Scott T Wilber
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 5.221

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.