Literature DB >> 27770324

Investigation on the reaction of phenolic pollutions to mono-rhamnolipid micelles using MEUF.

Zhifeng Liu1,2, Mingda Yu3,4, Guangming Zeng5,6, Min Li3,4, Jiachao Zhang7, Hua Zhong3,4, Yang Liu3,4, Binbin Shao3,4, Zhigang Li3,4,7, Zhiquan Wang3,4, Guansheng Liu3,4, Xin Yang3,4.   

Abstract

Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) processes of resorcinol, phenol, and 1-Naphthol with rhamnolipid as an anionic biosurfactant were investigated using polysulfone membrane. The effects of retentate/permeate concentration of phenolic pollutants (C R/C P), distribution coefficient of phenolic pollutions (D), concentration ratios of phenolic pollutions (α P) and rhamnolipids (α R) and adsorption capacity of the membrane (N m) were studied by operating pressure, pH condition, feed surfactant, and phenolic pollution concentrations. Results showed that C R (with pH) increased and ranked in the following order: resorcinol > phenol > 1-Naphthol, which is same with C R (with pressure), C R (with surfactant), C R/C P (with pollution), α,P and D, while C P (with pH), C P (with pressure), and C P (with surfactant) ranked in the reverse order. The operating pressure increased the solubility of phenolic from 0 to 0.1 MPa and then decreased slowly above 0.1 MPa. The concentration ratio of rhamnolipid was nearly at 2.0 and that of phenolic pollution was slightly above 1.0. D of phenolic pollutants reached the maximum at phenolic pollution concentration of 0.1 mM and the feed rhamnolipid concentration at 1 CMC. Moreover, zeta potential in feed stream and retentate stream and membrane adsorption of phenolic pollutions were firstly investigated in this article; the magnitudes of zeta potential with the feed stream of three phenolic pollutions were nearly the same and slightly lower than those with the retentate stream. The adsorption capacity of the membrane (N m) was calculated and compared to the former research, which showed that rhamnolipid significantly decreases the membrane adsorption of phenolic pollutions at a relatively lower concentration. It was implied that rhamnolipid can be substituted for chemical surfactants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrophobicity; Membrane adsorption; Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration; Mono-rhamnolipid; Phenolic pollutions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770324     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7851-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  22 in total

1.  Adsorption and desorption of phenol on activated carbon and a comparison of isotherm models.

Authors:  Bestamin Ozkaya
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Aggregation behaviour of a dirhamnolipid biosurfactant secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aqueous media.

Authors:  Marina Sánchez; Francisco J Aranda; María J Espuny; Ana Marqués; José A Teruel; Angeles Manresa; Antonio Ortiz
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Dynamic and steady state studies of phenol biodegradation in pure and mixed cultures.

Authors:  R D Yang; A E Humphrey
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effect of Triton X-100 on the removal of aqueous phenol by laccase analyzed with a combined approach of experiments and molecular docking.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Zhuotong Zeng; Guangming Zeng; Xuanming Liu; Zhifeng Liu; Ming Chen; Lifeng Liu; Jianbing Li; Gengxin Xie
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.268

5.  Effect of monorhamnolipid on the degradation of n-hexadecane by Candida tropicalis and the association with cell surface properties.

Authors:  Guangming Zeng; Zhifeng Liu; Hua Zhong; Jianbing Li; Xingzhong Yuan; Haiyan Fu; Ying Ding; Jing Wang; Meifang Zhou
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Mineralization of organic micropollutants (homologous alcohols and phenols) in water by vacuum-UV-oxidation (H2O-VUV) with an incoherent xenon-excimer lamp at 172 nm.

Authors:  T Oppenländer; S Gliese
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Biosorption of phenol and 2-chlorophenol by Funalia trogii pellets.

Authors:  Gulay Bayramoglu; Ihsan Gursel; Yagmur Tunali; M Yakup Arica
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Biodegradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel.

Authors:  Muftah H El-Naas; Shaheen A Al-Muhtaseb; Souzan Makhlouf
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  Improvement of oxidative decomposition of aqueous phenol by microwave irradiation in UV/H2O2 process and kinetic study.

Authors:  Do-Hung Han; Sang-Yeob Cha; Hae-Young Yang
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Adsorption of phenol by bentonite.

Authors:  F A Banat; B Al-Bashir; S Al-Asheh; O Hayajneh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Polyaniline-based adsorbents for removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution: a mini review.

Authors:  Yilin Jiang; Zhifeng Liu; Guangming Zeng; Yujie Liu; Binbin Shao; Zhigang Li; Yang Liu; Wei Zhang; Qingyun He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Heavy metal (Cu, Cd, Pb, Cr) washing from river sediment using biosurfactant rhamnolipid.

Authors:  Weifang Chen; Yan Qu; Zhihua Xu; Feifei He; Zai Chen; Sisi Huang; Yuxiang Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.