Literature DB >> 27770283

Accounting for individualized competing mortality risks in estimating postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

Mara A Schonberg1,2, Vicky W Li3, A Heather Eliassen4,5, Roger B Davis3, Andrea Z LaCroix6, Ellen P McCarthy3, Bernard A Rosner4,5, Rowan T Chlebowski7, Susan E Hankinson4,5,8, Edward R Marcantonio3, Long H Ngo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate risk assessment is necessary for decision-making around breast cancer prevention. We aimed to develop a breast cancer prediction model for postmenopausal women that would take into account their individualized competing risk of non-breast cancer death.
METHODS: We included 73,066 women who completed the 2004 Nurses' Health Study (NHS) questionnaire (all ≥57 years) and followed participants until May 2014. We considered 17 breast cancer risk factors (health behaviors, demographics, family history, reproductive factors) and 7 risk factors for non-breast cancer death (comorbidities, functional dependency) and mammography use. We used competing risk regression to identify factors independently associated with breast cancer. We validated the final model by examining calibration (expected-to-observed ratio of breast cancer incidence, E/O) and discrimination (c-statistic) using 74,887 subjects from the Women's Health Initiative Extension Study (WHI-ES; all were ≥55 years and followed for 5 years).
RESULTS: Within 5 years, 1.8 % of NHS participants were diagnosed with breast cancer (vs. 2.0 % in WHI-ES, p = 0.02), and 6.6 % experienced non-breast cancer death (vs. 5.2 % in WHI-ES, p < 0.001). Using a model selection procedure which incorporated the Akaike Information Criterion, c-statistic, statistical significance, and clinical judgement, our final model included 9 breast cancer risk factors, 5 comorbidities, functional dependency, and mammography use. The model's c-statistic was 0.61 (95 % CI [0.60-0.63]) in NHS and 0.57 (0.55-0.58) in WHI-ES. On average, our model under predicted breast cancer in WHI-ES (E/O 0.92 [0.88-0.97]).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel prediction model that factors in postmenopausal women's individualized competing risks of non-breast cancer death when estimating breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer prediction; Competing risks; Older

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770283      PMCID: PMC5093031          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4020-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  42 in total

1.  Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Aaron K Aragaki; Lewis H Kuller; JoAnn E Manson; Margery Gass; Elizabeth Bluhm; Stephanie Connelly; F Allan Hubbell; Dorothy Lane; Lisa Martin; Judith Ockene; Thomas Rohan; Robert Schenken; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer: proposed biologic mechanisms and areas for future research.

Authors:  Heather K Neilson; Christine M Friedenreich; Nigel T Brockton; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Effect of changing breast cancer incidence rates on the calibration of the Gail model.

Authors:  Sara J Schonfeld; David Pee; Robert T Greenlee; Patricia Hartge; James V Lacey; Yikyung Park; Arthur Schatzkin; Kala Visvanathan; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  External validation of an index to predict up to 9-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Z Huang; S E Hankinson; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; D J Hunter; J E Manson; C H Hennekens; B Rosner; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Risk factors for breast cancer in elderly women.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Cindy K Blair; Kristin E Anderson; DeAnn Lazovich; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Mammographic screening and risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Performance of the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool Among Women Age 75 Years and Older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Vicky W Li; A Heather Eliassen; Roger B Davis; Andrea Z LaCroix; Ellen P McCarthy; Bernard A Rosner; Rowan T Chlebowski; Thomas E Rohan; Susan E Hankinson; Edward R Marcantonio; Long H Ngo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.816

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Christine E Kistler; Adlin Pinheiro; Alicia R Jacobson; Gianna M Aliberti; Maria Karamourtopoulos; Michelle Hayes; Bridget A Neville; Carmen L Lewis; Christina C Wee; Angela Fagerlin; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Edward R Marcantonio; Mary Beth Hamel; Roger B Davis
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.