| Literature DB >> 27770238 |
Miriam Krischke1,2, Georg Hempel3, Swantje Völler3, Nicolas André4,5, Maurizio D'Incalci6, Gianni Bisogno7, Wolfgang Köpcke8, Matthias Borowski8, Ralf Herold9, Alan V Boddy10,11, Joachim Boos12.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Doxorubicin is a key component in many pediatric oncology treatment regimens; still pharmacology data on which current dosing regimens are based are very limited.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Cardiotoxicity; Children; Doxorubicin; Pharmacokinetic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27770238 PMCID: PMC5114325 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-016-3174-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ISSN: 0344-5704 Impact factor: 3.333
Fig. 1Study design (sampling scheme for patients >3 years). Simplified overview of the main trial procedures, including pharmacokinetic and natriuretic peptides/troponin sampling times (termed A–E) as well as echocardiography schedules (termed 1.1–2.2). Sampling had to be done from two different chemotherapy blocks chosen by the investigator. Sampling schemes for patients <3 years were identical, with the exception that only 5 PK samples (3 + 2) were requested
Demographics and clinical characteristics of recruited patients
| Total | <3 years | 3 to <18 years | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 101 | 27 | 74 |
|
| |||
| Median | 5.3 | 1.6 | 7.3 |
| Range | 0.2–17.7 | 0.2–2.9 | 3.0–17.7 |
|
| |||
| Median | 111.5 | 84 | 129 |
| Range | 52–194 | 52–97 | 89–194 |
|
| |||
| Median | 19.2 | 11.1 | 26 |
| Range | 3.6–88.1 | 3.6–14.7 | 111.5–88.1 |
|
| |||
| Median | 28.7 | 29.1 | 28.6 |
| Range | 10.4–57.7 | 10.4–57.7 | 18.2–56.8 |
|
| |||
| Median | 3.88 | 3.95 | 3.88 |
| Range | 0.25–24.02 | 0.25–24 | 0.28–24.02 |
|
| |||
| Male | 50 | 11 | 39 |
| Female | 51 | 16 | 35 |
|
| |||
| Wilms tumor | 12 | 3 | 9 |
| Neuroblastoma | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| Ewing sarcoma | 27 | 1 | 26 |
| Soft tissue sarcoma | 16 | 5 | 11 |
| ALL | 30 | 7 | 23 |
| Other | 7 | 7 | 0 |
|
| |||
| France | 24 | 6 | 18 |
| Germany | 29 | 6 | 23 |
| Italy | 27 | 10 | 17 |
| UK | 21 | 6 | 15 |
Fig. 2Plasma concentration time curves. Doxorubicin plasma concentration time curves estimated by the PopPK model of the first sampling period for four different patients are shown together with the corresponding doxorubicin plasma concentration half-lives. The open circles present the actual measured values. A and B were patients with soft tissue sarcoma and a scheduled infusion duration of 4 h. Patient A was 12.99 years old and patient B 0.66 years. The actual infusion time for patient B was 4.77 h. C and D were patients with ALL and a scheduled infusion duration of 1 h. Patient C was 12.89 years and patient D 2.09 years. The actual infusion time for D was 1.04 h
Fig. 3Age dependency of doxorubicin clearance. Distribution of clearance (CL) (normalized to BSA) for the two investigated age groups (A: <3 years and B: 3 to <18 years). Data are summarized as box-and-whisker plots. In each plot, the central box represents values from the lower to upper quartile (25–75 percentiles) and the middle line the median. The end of the upper whisker corresponds to the largest observation smaller than the 75 % quantile + 2*IQR. Likewise, the end of the lower whisker corresponds to the smallest observation larger than the 25 % quantile − 2*IQR. Observations that are beyond the whiskers can be regarded as outliers
Fig. 4Biomarker concentrations of NT-proBNP and cTnT before and after doxorubicin administration. NT-proBNP (a exemplary for the three natriuretic peptides) and cTnT (b exemplary for the two cardiac troponins) concentrations in plasma samples before (Samples A and C) and at different times after doxorubicin administration (samples B, D, E). Data are summarized as box-and-whisker plots as explained in Fig. 3
Spearman’s rank correlations between biomarker concentration differences and doxorubicin dose intensity measures
| Doxo | Doxo AUC (of corresponding sampling period) | Doxo AUC (sum of all doxo administrations from first to second sampling period) | Doxo dose/BSA (sum of all doxo administrations from first to second sampling period) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT-proANP (sample B)–NT-proANP (sample A) | −0.276 ( | −0.037 ( | ||
| NT-proANP (sample D)–NT-proANP (sample C) | −0.207 ( | −0.310 ( | ||
| BNP (sample B)–BNP (sample A) | −0.382 ( | −0.204 ( | ||
| BNP (sample D)–BNP (sample C) | −0.306 ( | −0.066 ( | ||
| NT-proBNP (sample B)–NT-proBNP (sample A) | −0.219 ( | −0.079 ( | ||
| NT-proBNP (sample D)–NT-proBNP (sample C) | −0.214 ( | 0.079 ( | ||
| cTnT (sample E)–cTnT (sample A) | 0.104 ( | 0.181 ( | ||
| cTnI (sample E)–cTnI (sample A) | 0.233 ( | 0.262 ( |