Literature DB >> 27768985

The impact of general practice nursing care on patient satisfaction and enablement in Australia: A mixed methods study.

Jane Desborough1, Nasser Bagheri2, Michelle Banfield3, Jane Mills4, Christine Phillips5, Rosemary Korda6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The numbers of nurses in general practice in Australia tripled between 2004 and 2012. However, evidence on whether nursing care in general practice improves patient outcomes is scarce. Although patient satisfaction and enablement have been examined extensively as outcomes of general practitioner care, there is little research into these outcomes from nursing care in general practice. The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between specific general practice characteristics and nurse consultation characteristics, and patient satisfaction and enablement
METHODS: A mixed methods study examined a cross-section of patients from 21 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory. The Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey was distributed to 1665 patients who received nursing care between September 2013 and March 2014. Grounded theory methods were used to analyse interviews with staff and patients from these same practices. An integrated analysis of data from both components was conducted using multilevel mixed effect models.
RESULTS: Data from 678 completed patient surveys (response rate=42%) and 48 interviews with 16 nurses, 23 patients and 9 practice managers were analysed. Patients who had longer nurse consultations were more satisfied (OR=2.50, 95% CI: 1.43-4.35) and more enabled (OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.45-4.50) than those who had shorter consultations. Patients who had continuity of care with the same general practice nurse were more satisfied (OR=2.31, 95% CI: 1.33-4.00) than those who consulted with a nurse they had never met before. Patients who attended practices where nurses worked with broad scopes of practice and high levels of autonomy were more satisfied (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.09-2.82) and more enabled (OR=2.56, 95% CI: 1.40-4.68) than patients who attended practices where nurses worked with narrow scopes of practice and low levels of autonomy. Patients who received nursing care for the management of chronic conditions (OR=2.64, 95% CI: 1.32-5.30) were more enabled than those receiving preventive health care.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of the importance of continuity of general practice nurse care, adequate time in general practice nurse consultations, and broad scopes of nursing practice and autonomy for patient satisfaction and enablement. The findings of this study provide evidence of the true value of enhanced nursing roles in general practice. They demonstrate that when the vision for improved coordination and multidisciplinary primary health care, including expanded roles of nurses, is implemented, high quality patient outcomes can be achieved. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General practice; General practice nursing; Mixed methods; Nursing scope of practice; Patient enablement; Patient satisfaction; Primary health care; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27768985     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  11 in total

Review 1.  A review of the growth and development of Australian practice nursing: Insights for the dietetic workforce.

Authors:  Alexandra R Davidson; Dianne P Reidlinger
Journal:  Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Effectiveness of registered nurses on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Lukewich; Ruth Martin-Misener; Allison A Norful; Marie-Eve Poitras; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Shabnam Asghari; Emily Gard Marshall; Maria Mathews; Michelle Swab; Dana Ryan; Joan Tranmer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Satisfaction of surgical patients with perioperative nursing care in a Spanish tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Amalia Sillero Sillero; Adelaida Zabalegui
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-12-10

4.  Patients' ideas, concerns, expectations and satisfaction in primary health care - a questionnaire study of patients and health care professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Joel Freilich; Eivor Wiking; Gunnar H Nilsson; Christina Olsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Moving from "let's fix them" to "actually listen": the development of a primary care intervention for mental-physical multimorbidity.

Authors:  Kylie J McKenzie; Susan L Fletcher; David Pierce; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  How does overall hospital satisfaction relate to patient experience with nursing care? a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Yuxia Zhang; Wei Qin; Zhenghong Yu; JingXian Yu; Ying Lin; XiaoRong Li; Zheng Zheng; Ying Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Quality care process metrics for nurses working in general practice, mapping the evidence: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Orla Loftus Moran; Mary Casey; Laserina O'Connor; Walter Cullen
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  The Growing Importance of Mixed-Methods Research in Health.

Authors:  Sharada Prasad Wasti; Padam Simkhada; Edwin R van Teijlingen; Brijesh Sathian; Indrajit Banerjee
Journal:  Nepal J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-31

9.  Understanding factors affecting 30-day unplanned readmissions for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA): the ACT Transition from Hospital to Home Orthopaedics Survey.

Authors:  Madhur Chhabra; Diana Perriman; Christine Phillips; Anne Parkinson; Nicholas Glasgow; Kirsty Douglas; Darlene Cox; Paul Smith; Jane Desborough
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient involvement in assessing consultation quality: validation of patient enablement instrument (PEI) in Lithuanian general practice.

Authors:  Aelita Skarbalienė; Arnoldas Jurgutis; Eva Lena Strandberg; Teresa Pawlikowska
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.